Maura Murray

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
I sent an email to the account immediately after Sam posted it and it hasn't kicked back to me either.
I found, as you did, that "n2mail" apparently no longer offers its services. But that's contradictory considering neither of us received an error message. Perhaps old accounts were grandfathered into a server that still allows for use?
An extensive search of 'm.murray@n2mail.com' turned up nothing else on the Internet outside of Spokeo. But perhaps that is because of what you stated about n2 allowing for customizable addresses.

It got kicked back as "delayed" and will try for a total of 5 days (120 hours) to deliver it.

The n2mail.com domain is registered to a Dutch company. It was created in 1997 and is expiring in 2014 if not renewed. It´s status is given as "locked", which I assume means it still has a vild registration but is not in use.

gvmeabrk wrote:

***All of you can make fun of me all you want. I KNOW what I saw. Please remember that what I saw was in 2006.***

Does anyone else find it strange that gvmeabrk just happens to pop in after a long absence, blames everyone of making fun of her and then disappears without even explaining what in the world she is talking about?

Wowzer the real one wrote:

gvmeabrk wrote:
***All of you can make fun of me all you want. I KNOW what I saw. Please remember that what I saw was in 2006.***
Does anyone else find it strange that gvmeabrk just happens to pop in after a long absence, blames everyone of making fun of her and then disappears without even explaining what in the world she is talking about?

Very strange. Was it really her?

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Very strange. Was it really her?

It could have been. But maybe not. I have no idea.
Unless you register your name(moniker) on Topix anyone can use your moniker as we have seen recently.
I just thought it was weird to come out with that statement and then just disappear and not bother to answer any questions or explain herself. Or himself since we don't really know who that person really is.

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks. I have yet to receive this myself.

If it is MM's mail, maybe it's monitored, causing the delay, and both of us will be getting a visit from LE.

it's been almost 10 years. strangers, not family, and not her closest friends, tease out remote leads day after day....first one group, then another, and another. pretty silly, at one level, a pointless endeavor at another.

i am still captivated by why more than a handful of strangers remain captivated by her disappearance. there are so many....lost, disappeared.

as i once said, the still active story of the missing Maine toddler, Ayla Reynolds is gripping.

some have an interest in the local vicinity of where MM's car landed....they stand against the unsupported accusations made against the area and the people in the name of MM, and would like the mystery solved.
why would a father silence a daughter's friends during and after the active years of searching? why jump to "dirtbag" when the family obviously knew their own daughter / sister without first examining her relationships prior to her disappearance?

others follow any and all mysteries.

while i'm still puzzling out the psychological fascination, some years later, why not challenge each other to make every attempt to keep the facts straight?
i was hoping that would be the goal for Renner....when someone reads the book, please let me know if there was an honest effort to fact-check and report.....truth....not fiction.

SnowyB wrote:

it's been almost 10 years. strangers, not family, and not her closest friends, tease out remote leads day after day....first one group, then another, and another. pretty silly, at one level, a pointless endeavor at another.
i am still captivated by why more than a handful of strangers remain captivated by her disappearance. there are so many....lost, disappeared.
as i once said, the still active story of the missing Maine toddler, Ayla Reynolds is gripping.
some have an interest in the local vicinity of where MM's car landed....they stand against the unsupported accusations made against the area and the people in the name of MM, and would like the mystery solved.
why would a father silence a daughter's friends during and after the active years of searching? why jump to "dirtbag" when the family obviously knew their own daughter / sister without first examining her relationships prior to her disappearance?
others follow any and all mysteries.
while i'm still puzzling out the psychological fascination, some years later, why not challenge each other to make every attempt to keep the facts straight?
i was hoping that would be the goal for Renner....when someone reads the book, please let me know if there was an honest effort to fact-check and report.....truth....not fiction.

Good points Snowy. Hope you are having a nice weekend. Surprisingly quiet here last night.

Habs wrote:

<quoted text>
Good points Snowy. Hope you are having a nice weekend. Surprisingly quiet here last night.

succinctly stated....
why are the captivated so captivated?

hope you're enjoying your weekend, as well...i live for precious days 6 & 7 to recover from the demands of the week. imo, there are 4 weekdays named monday before arriving at friday...and so it goes.

yes, there was a lull last night. Habs, consider loading a moon phase app to more accurately predict the activities on topix!

SnowyB wrote:

i was hoping that would be the goal for Renner....when someone reads the book, please let me know if there was an honest effort to fact-check and report.....truth....not fiction.

From Renner's Twitter Feed a couple of weeks ago:

"James Renner &#8207;@JamesRenner 9 Sep
Nearly finished with first draft of Maura Murray book. This is the darkest thing I've ever written and 100% true. Sooo many scary people."

From his Facebook page last week:

"James Renner
September 20 via mobile
(Very) rough draft of that Maura Murray true crime book is finished. 300 pages of creepiness. Lots of editing and a last round of reporting, now."

Dark? Creepiness? Scary people?

Is that what any of the rest of you think about from what you know about this case? From everything I've read, I don't feel that way at all.

Renner doesn't know what happened to Maura. After all of his research, he has very few facts, because there aren't many. Therefore, the only darkness, creepiness and scary people will have nothing to do with what actually happened to Maura. 100% true? What, Kathleen growing pot, photos in magazines that could have been put there by anybody, Beagle's videos?

From these descriptions and everything Renner has said the past, I'm sure this book is going to be a hatchet job against the Murray family and friends, all because they wouldn't talk to him. Very sad situation.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
From Renner's Twitter Feed a couple of weeks ago:
"James Renner &#8207;@JamesRenner 9 Sep
Nearly finished with first draft of Maura Murray book. This is the darkest thing I've ever written and 100% true. Sooo many scary people."
From his Facebook page last week:
"James Renner
September 20 via mobile
(Very) rough draft of that Maura Murray true crime book is finished. 300 pages of creepiness. Lots of editing and a last round of reporting, now."
Dark? Creepiness? Scary people?
Is that what any of the rest of you think about from what you know about this case? From everything I've read, I don't feel that way at all.
Renner doesn't know what happened to Maura. After all of his research, he has very few facts, because there aren't many. Therefore, the only darkness, creepiness and scary people will have nothing to do with what actually happened to Maura. 100% true? What, Kathleen growing pot, photos in magazines that could have been put there by anybody, Beagle's videos?
From these descriptions and everything Renner has said the past, I'm sure this book is going to be a hatchet job against the Murray family and friends, all because they wouldn't talk to him. Very sad situation.

I certainly hope he has done more than the digging up embarrassing stuff on the family that is apparent from the blog, and that "dark", "creepy" and "scary" don´t just describe a family of pot-growing, porn addicted bulimic hoarding alcoholics..

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
From Renner's Twitter Feed a couple of weeks ago:
"James Renner &#8207;@JamesRenner 9 Sep
Nearly finished with first draft of Maura Murray book. This is the darkest thing I've ever written and 100% true. Sooo many scary people."
From his Facebook page last week:
"James Renner
September 20 via mobile
(Very) rough draft of that Maura Murray true crime book is finished. 300 pages of creepiness. Lots of editing and a last round of reporting, now."
Dark? Creepiness? Scary people?
Is that what any of the rest of you think about from what you know about this case? From everything I've read, I don't feel that way at all.
Renner doesn't know what happened to Maura. After all of his research, he has very few facts, because there aren't many. Therefore, the only darkness, creepiness and scary people will have nothing to do with what actually happened to Maura. 100% true? What, Kathleen growing pot, photos in magazines that could have been put there by anybody, Beagle's videos?
From these descriptions and everything Renner has said the past, I'm sure this book is going to be a hatchet job against the Murray family and friends, all because they wouldn't talk to him. Very sad situation.

.
thx for the update, Maruchan; seems like a disappointing prospect, then.
i'll bet Beagle will be featured; perhaps his reference to creepiness is for calling Beagle...the creep. not much substance, right?

The only scary, creepy person I´ve encountered in relation to this case is JG.

hannah_b wrote:

The only scary, creepy person I´ve encountered in relation to this case is JG.

indeed.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

gvmeabrk wrote:
***All of you can make fun of me all you want. I KNOW what I saw. Please remember that what I saw was in 2006.***
Does anyone else find it strange that gvmeabrk just happens to pop in after a long absence, blames everyone of making fun of her and then disappears without even explaining what in the world she is talking about?

gvmeabrk retracted some of her story awhile back. Didn't she say that she "now believes that the person she saw at CF was not Maura after all" I'm using quotes and shouldn't be, but it's basically what she was saying, I thought.

So yes, I do not think this is really her either.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
From Renner's Twitter Feed a couple of weeks ago:
"James Renner &#8207;@JamesRenner 9 Sep
Nearly finished with first draft of Maura Murray book. This is the darkest thing I've ever written and 100% true. Sooo many scary people."
From his Facebook page last week:
"James Renner
September 20 via mobile
(Very) rough draft of that Maura Murray true crime book is finished. 300 pages of creepiness. Lots of editing and a last round of reporting, now."
Dark? Creepiness? Scary people?
Is that what any of the rest of you think about from what you know about this case? From everything I've read, I don't feel that way at all.
Renner doesn't know what happened to Maura. After all of his research, he has very few facts, because there aren't many. Therefore, the only darkness, creepiness and scary people will have nothing to do with what actually happened to Maura. 100% true? What, Kathleen growing pot, photos in magazines that could have been put there by anybody, Beagle's videos?
From these descriptions and everything Renner has said the past, I'm sure this book is going to be a hatchet job against the Murray family and friends, all because they wouldn't talk to him. Very sad situation.

OMG! Thanks for bringing this here. I kind of lost interest when those blogs started bubbling over into so many (other than MM) things. I never did like white noise, and i just HATE ripping on others.

What is everyone afraid of? Truth?

for those that have paid attention,Renner has told you how his book would be laid out and it is not like the blog,but you just want to paint him in a different light.

jwb wrote:

for those that have paid attention,Renner has told you how his book would be laid out and it is not like the blog,but you just want to paint him in a different light.

I can only speak for myself, but in my opinion, the tide turned when he let someone else take the wheel. The out of control personality was allowed to be out of control and never condoned. If the author has no interest, then neither do I.

Nobody is perfect but if you want to feel that way towards jr cause of jg actions then that is your perogative.JG crapped on me pretty good but that doen't take away from my appreciation from what JR has done.With that said,I would have liked something said by JR regarding JG behavior but he is here to write a book and not be apologetic for others. I do get your point.