Maura Murray

Judged:

2

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok, I see three possibilities. Either we now know why family always refused to tell the name of the art gallery, or we know how somebody could call Maura on the work landline with a number that wasn´t public, or this is just more bullcrap to add to the pile.

Judged:

1

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok, I see three possibilities. Either we now know why family always refused to tell the name of the art gallery, or we know how somebody could call Maura on the work landline with a number that wasn´t public, or this is just more bullcrap to add to the pile.

Judged:

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
A collegue of MM´s having been investigated and ruled out by LE as having anything to do with her disappearance, would explain why family refused to let the public know what art gallery she worked at. They may have wanted to protect him, knowing online sleuthers would rip him to pieces. IF the gallery was the work place referred to, that is. If the poster was talking about a collegue at MM´s other place of work, UMass security, it could possibly explain how MM could receive a call on the security desk landline from somewhere on campus in spite of the number being available only to campus police and security staff. A security collegue would know the number. As we can´t be certain there is any truth to this allegation, it could also just by pure BS. Clearer?

Judged:

3

2

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Not saying it can't happen but in all the car v ped accident I was called to I never saw a "glancing blow". I think car speed relative to the ped speed would make glancing blows unlikely. At least that is my experience.
Bill

James Renner wrote:

Your emails bounce back because you are emailing from an AOL account which is why I now have gmail: jameswrenner@gmail.com
For the record, I am a marxist. But I'm glad someone is reading my tweets.

NickDGrove wrote:

<quoted text>
I bet you go hunting after church

Judged:

1

NickDGrove wrote:

as idiotic as 'fizzy's' comment I am no fan of renner.
i e-mailed renner attemping to give away some info. not that it was earth shattering .. but still info never released.
the e-mail bounces back. he stopped using the becarriedaway account. the very account on his blogger account.
can't monitor 2 e-mail accounts? you're THAT lazy?
i'm not giving him anything. i'd give it to JG first. all you have to do jg is e-mail me. one thing can be said about jg. sure he's a nutcase. but he aint lazy.

Judged:

1

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes thank you. Is the "person at her work" idea ever been a real theory? I had never seen it mentioned before.

Judged:

1

James Renner wrote:

I contacted the posted of the "person at work" post. She said she'd gotten that detail confused with the Brianna Maitland case.

Judged:

2

2

2

SnowyB wrote:

the moon is howling full.

Judged:

1

1

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Time for popcorn!

Judged:

1

1

JWB wrote:

"In 1999, a grand jury in the brutal murder case of 6-year-old JonBenet Ramsey voted to indict her parents, John and Patsy Ramsey. But then-Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter refused to sign it, citing that he could not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
The indictment's existence was not known until earlier this year. Now a judge has ruled that the current Boulder DA Stan Garnett must show why the un-prosecuted indictment must remain secret."
14 years and nobody was aware of the indictment that was never prosecuted.