Maura Murray

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
Well my dear, opaque, intellectual muffin topped incest flexing aside, I'm a fairly common man. xoxo

Being such a common man doesn't stop you from sprinkling your intellectual goodies down on us mere mortals. Way up there, on your opaque cloud. With your alter ego by your side.
xoxo

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
Well he isn't much on reading and book learning and such. He's in quite a mood at present. Still pissed at my brother, cousin Bob for trying to marry a virgin. His philosophy; If she ain't good enough for her own kin, she ain't good enough for ours. Makes good sense if ya think about it....He's always been a deep thinker like that though.

Not much on reading and book learning? Maybe when your new book "Sandcastles" comes out, you could put some pretty pictures in there using your special fat crayons. I bet that will change Billy Bob's mind!

LocoLefty wrote:

<quoted text>
Being such a common man doesn't stop you from sprinkling your intellectual goodies down on us mere mortals. Way up there, on your opaque cloud. With your alter ego by your side.
xoxo

See, there you go again...it's like poetry, just beautiful...sigh..I've got to get some z's, you carry on though doll... xoxo

LocoLefty wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer, that makes a whole lot of sense. You *would* have to convince yourself that I was a little jealous (or some other pejorative) because of your dislike for me. Interesting, your choice of adjective. I've never seen you describe the others here who disagree with Ridiculous as you just described me. I wonder what it is about my writing that makes you say that.
Thank you, Wowzer, you just made my night ;)

I don't dislike you. How can you dislike someone that you don't know. Sometimes I dislike things that people do or say.
I wish you'd stop using those big words though. They're giving me a headache and I'm still trying to figure out what the heck intellectual incest is.
Oh, and your very welcome.:)

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
See, there you go again...it's like poetry, just beautiful...sigh..I've got to get some z's, you carry on though doll... xoxo

Yes, I thought it was a little bit past your bedtime you little muffin top stud ;)
xoxo

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer, you're too kind ; ) It cracks me up...pseudo intellectuals are always trying to use the damndest words to prove their brilliance. Real intellectuals, realizing that us mere mortals don't typically function at their level tend to use fairly common language to express complex thoughts as their goal is to educate, not "strut" their stuff. At the risk of pissing him off by exposing him as an intellectual, I'm going to have to toss Bill out there as the perfect example of a true intellectual. Instead of trying to impress us with his ability to paint murals on the ceiling of the chapel. He tosses us concrete blocks that we can grab ahold of and explains in laymans terms about the necessity of a solid foundation to build on. Sammy. JG and co. build some very pretty sand castles, but there's always the tide to consider. ; )

Yep those big words are something alright. I've worn my thumb print off from flipping through the dictionary.

That dude's just plain ridiculous.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep those big words are something alright. I've worn my thumb print off from flipping through the dictionary.

Wowzer, save yourself some effort, don't give yourself a bigger headache.
Try google ;)

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm actually glad she is back. Ridiculous is here, Maruchan, WTH the Original. Now if Only Snowy and Bill NH were here I'd say my family is home for the holidays.

Aww thank you Lighthouse. If nothing else we've at least livened up the forum a bit tonight.:)
Yes we're missing a couple but I'm hoping they will return someday soon.

"Safe upon the solid rock the ugly houses stand: come and see my shining palace built upon the sand." ~E. St. V. M.

And so castles made of sand, slips into the sea, eventually.

You think Maura will join the forum when they find her?!?!

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Aww thank you Lighthouse. If nothing else we've at least livened up the forum a bit tonight.:)
Yes we're missing a couple but I'm hoping they will return someday soon.

Agree with Wowzer, nice post Lighthouse. I was watching the live Sound of Music on NBC (disappointing), missed the, uh, fun earlier. Next time, you might want to close off the doggie door, keep out the skunks, they carry rabies you know, makes them go, oh, what's the word, crazy.

:)

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
And you reappear here for what reason exactly? Your first post in a while is to defend Sam and to insult/bully Topix posters.
<quoted text>
Then you try to entice Wowzer into conversing with you with your phony "welcome back" and question you proposed about why she came back when your only reason for asking was to insult her:
<quoted text>
You are a bully Tyler. None of the people you are ripping on here come over to your bloggy world to insult you. You, Green, Renner, and Ledyard are the only ones who do that. You insert yourselves into this forum for no reason other than to pick fights with regular posters here, something that nobody here does to you.
Bully.

I have not "reappeared" as you put it. I've been here. It's not often that I'm compelled to post to this thread, but I do read it.

The problem I have with many of the posters here, is that they're flat out inaccurate with most of their accusations.

For example, I've recently seen regular posters here claim that Sam was John Green (false), that the backpack found by Tom wasn't real (false), that James Renner asked Sam to make contact with DW's mother (false), that we aren't genuinely interested in hearing what DW has to say (false), that John Green is still involved with the Maura Murray Community (false).

Actually Maruchan, I think you have posted most of those inaccuracies.

It's unfortunate that readers who follow this thread and Maura's case might believe some of the things you say. I do not think it's responsible of you to post about things you don't have first hand knowledge of in a way that makes it sound as if you do.

If you honestly disagree with some of the things that happen around this case... contacting DW's mother, for example, that's one thing. But to blatantly lie in an attempt to discredit genuinely helpful posters such as Sam, is extremely detrimental to the truth.

If you have any doubt about my integrity or intentions surrounding this case, I'd be more than happy to discuss my methods of research with you in private. I welcome you to PM me, email me or even give me a phone call if you'd like. I do not mean to come off as uppity when posting here, but reading falsifications of information that I know, without question, to be accurate is extremely frustrating.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
And you reappear here for what reason exactly? Your first post in a while is to defend Sam and to insult/bully Topix posters.
<quoted text>
Then you try to entice Wowzer into conversing with you with your phony "welcome back" and question you proposed about why she came back when your only reason for asking was to insult her:
<quoted text>
You are a bully Tyler. None of the people you are ripping on here come over to your bloggy world to insult you. You, Green, Renner, and Ledyard are the only ones who do that. You insert yourselves into this forum for no reason other than to pick fights with regular posters here, something that nobody here does to you.
Bully.

I have not "reappeared" as you put it. I've been here. It's not often that I'm compelled to post to this thread, but I do read it.

The problem I have with many of the posters here, is that they're flat out inaccurate with most of their accusations.

For example, I've recently seen regular posters here claim that Sam was John Green (false), that the backpack found by Tom wasn't real (false), that James Renner asked Sam to make contact with DW's mother (false), that we aren't genuinely interested in hearing what DW has to say (false), that John Green is still involved with the Maura Murray Community (false).

Actually Maruchan, I think you have posted most of those inaccuracies.

It's unfortunate that readers who follow this thread and Maura's case might believe some of the things you say. I do not think it's responsible of you to post about things you don't have first hand knowledge of in a way that makes it sound as if you do.

If you honestly disagree with some of the things that happen around this case... contacting DW's mother, for example, that's one thing. But to blatantly lie in an attempt to discredit genuinely helpful posters such as Sam, is extremely detrimental to the truth.

If you have any doubt about my integrity or intentions surrounding this case, I'd be more than happy to discuss my methods of research with you in private. I welcome you to PM me, email me or even give me a phone call if you'd like. I do not mean to come off as uppity when posting here, but reading falsifications of information that I know, without question, to be accurate is extremely frustrating.

Topix is acting strange tonight. There seems to be a delay to my posts.

Tyler and Sam, You just have to realize that they are not interested in what happened to Maura Murray. You hear none of that from this bunch including Wowzer who lives right in the cross hairs. I also find it very sad but am also learning to stick to posting on Sams and Renners forum.

Continue your hard work and ignore them. I suggest stop posting here, I know they will continue to bash you on this thread no matter what but do we really care what they think? Keep you eyes on the prize and that is making a difference in finding the truth of what happened to Maura.

Give people more credit to figure for themselves that Maruchan aka ridiculous are only looking for pats on the back and have nothing to offer in the search of Maura Murray.

On another note: new info on Abigail Hernandez: FBI says she contacted her mom after her disappearance but it has been a couple weeks since they have heard anything else. Lets hope a good outcome there.

of the beholder...

Lets talk about lies.

I posted earlier to Sam "The fact that you ran right to her house at James request", and Sam labeled this as a lie...but...Read the quoted sentence carefully so you don't screw it up again....

James made the request for information on DW's whereabouts, albeit publicly, on his blog. Sam, ever eager to please, went the quickest route and hunted down DW's mother and asked her where her son was. So how was what I said a lie? Sam did exactly what I said he did. James made a request, and Sam dutifully tried to fulfill the request. Truth by me.

Tyler then paraphrased what I said as "James Renner asked Sam to make contact with DW's mother" which is not what I said at all, and is therefore, a lie, by Tyler.

The problem I have with Sam and Tyler is that they are flat out inaccurate with most of their accusations.

Bazinga!

I hear bashing of Sam for having the gall to ask someone a few questions and then with the same breath lambaste him for not taping it.

No win situation there and that is how they play the game.

I actually laid into Sam for something I felt was wrong but then he offered up his phone number and i called it. I never do that stuff cause it is sort of a dangerous thing ( hence no facebook or twitter) but anyway I really got a better feel for who he is and why he is putting so much into this.

What I am trying to say is lay off. He is trying to help find a missing person and it has been 10 years now so it is not a hot LE investigation.

someuser wrote:

You think Maura will join the forum when they find her?!?!

Maybe she's here already.