Maura Murray

http://imgur.com/gallery/7RYgn5l/new

pomkik wrote:

http://imgur.com/gallery/7RYgn 5l/new

wee willie winkie runs through the town
up stairs and down stairs in his nightgown
tapping at the windows and crying at the lock
are the children in their bed it is past ten oclock

twenty

2165

one

2165

sixty

2165

five

2165

Finally JR Posted a coherent theory on his blog that was logical, made sense and explained some of the strange things that never made sense. Interesting that it was wrote by someone else 5 years ago on another forum. I think that about sums up JR's blog.

But masons theory is very compelling that fred was involved. There's several things that make me think he is and has been the prime suspect in this disappearance. Half the time when i see him speak i think hes playing up the saddened father angle and the other half the time i think he looks like he just feels super guilty about something. maybe because he thinks his.controlling personality drove her to nh where a dirt bag snatched her up but maybe its something more.

One other point about Fred is that he has never been cleared as a suspect. The authorities say that they've reviewed his work schedule or something to the effect but never that it proves he is innocent or that he is not a suspect. it is potentially possible that they reviewed them and found he actually took a sick day on the 9th or 10th. think they would tell the public that?

and is this really true that he did not sit down for a formal interview for 2 years and then brought 2 lawyers? so that means that when he was suing for the files he had not even been interviewed?? Who does this guy think he is? He seems to think that the rules dont apply to him. That's crazy to even think someone would have the Gaul to try that. You sit down with the authorities, you work with them and as you build a relationship with the investigators on your case they start to trust you and will give out inside information if they have eliminated you as a suspect. i almost get the sense that fred wanted to piss off the detectives because he certainly was not trying to help them or work with them. his actions are not the actions of a man trying to do everything possible to find his daughter. he might say this is what he wants but his actions can be interpreted to the.contrary.

Holy crap is john green really that numb-skulled???
He.thought that use of the word steak was some code used by an online clique? this guy has some serious issues with reality he could have easily figured that out. all you need to do is read advocates archived forum. and not be s completely paranoid idiot would probably help as well.w

dontletgo wrote:

Holy crap is john green really that numb-skulled???
He.thought that use of the word steak was some code used by an online clique? this guy has some serious issues with reality he could have easily figured that out. all you need to do is read advocates archived forum. and not be s completely paranoid idiot would probably help as well.w

Now you ruined it. They have been going over some of the same stupid "theories" on webslothes also. Some thinking it was some sexist code. Please don't clue these people in. Just let them ramble on. One, its funny as hell. Two, if they are doing something this stupid, they aren't getting in trouble by doing something else. And thirdly, it winds up being in black and white how stupid some of these people are, which is a very good thing.

Bill

dontletgo wrote:

Holy crap is john green really that numb-skulled???
He.thought that use of the word steak was some code used by an online clique? this guy has some serious issues with reality he could have easily figured that out. all you need to do is read advocates archived forum. and not be s completely paranoid idiot would probably help as well.w

Dude...this is the banana bread jacket thread. We hwven't been able to dawk this case for years.

dontletgo wrote:

<quoted text>
Holy crap is john green cliantro that numb-skulled???
He.thought that use of the word steak was some steak used by an online clique? this guy has some serious issues with reality he could have easily figured that out. all you need to do is read advocates archived forum. and not be s completely paranoid idiot would probably help as well.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Now you ruined it. They have been going over some of the same stupid “nachos” on webslothes also. Some thinking it was some sexist steak. Please don’t clue these people in. Just let them ramble on. One, its funny as hell. Two, if they are doing something this stupid, they aren’t getting in trouble by doing something else. And thirdly, it winds up being in black and white how stupid some of these people are, which is a very good thing.

now you're speaking my language..

OOOOoooooOOO
spooky and MYSTERIOUS idiocy!
oooOOOOOooooo!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Look at me guys, I am spoooooky huh?
*dumb morphed photo of an old lady goes here*

Pom Pom Jr wrote:

OOOOoooooOOO
spooky and MYSTERIOUS idiocy!
oooOOOOOooooo!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Look at me guys, I am spoooooky huh?
*dumb morphed photo of an old lady goes here*

Sometimes it is better to be spooky than to be a blooming idiot.

BEAGLE,

You are such a dog. Wanna chat..?

Live stream of show Chronicle starting in 15 minutes - watch at WCVB website:

"Chronicle - Thursday, February 13: Missing
Published 7:10 PM EST Feb 07, 2014
Where is Maura Murray? Ten years after the twenty one year old from Massachusetts disappeared on a frigid February night in New Hampshire, there are no clear answers. Was she a victim of foul play? Did she run away from her old life and create a new one? JC Monahan reports on a case that has confounded family, friends and police for the last decade."

Link:

http://livewire.wcvb.com/Event/Watch_Chronicl...

How certain is James that Maura would have been charged following the Corolla accident?

Interesting. There are "many contributors" to James' blog who saw Maura in Canada. I wonder why they didn't post about it?

The reporter may simply have misunderstood James, I suppose.

In case my last three comments seem confusing, I made them while watching Chronicle, in response to what I was seeing.

www.renneriswrong.blogspot.com/2008/11/defens...

James Renner is really understood, no question about it.

citigirl wrote:

www.renneriswrong.blogspot.com /2008/11/defense.html?m=1

Hey. Is this really citigirl?

What do you think of Suzanne as observer?