Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

2

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
it's a reasonable request to move off-topic discussions to their appropriate threads. several of them exist to discuss Patric.
it's just common online etiquette to do so.

Judged:

2

2

2

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>I totally understand what you are saying Snowy. But my concern is why did no one refer WTH to Patrics sight when WTH made those comments about Deanne in his posting? She was only replying to his posting with statements that he had said about her on the Maura Murray forum.

Judged:

2

2

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Citigirl. I have been repeatedly responding to Deanne and her agents on at least two sites. Wicked Local is an agent for Deanne. Together they are spreading misinformation anywhere there are people willing to listen. Her loss is tremendous but it doesn't give her free reign to spread misinformation anywhere she wants.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

2

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>citigirl wrote:**No it may not be up to you as to what people say on a public forum. But it is up to you as a poster as to what you say on a public forum.**
Now I have to ask, are YOU serious citigirl??? You're always putting your Supergirl outfit on at the wrong time.

Judged:

5

4

4

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>No Wowzer I never said it was up to me as to what people said on a public forum. But what I did say is who are you to tell people what forum they should be on when in fact Deanna was replying to a posting about her that was on the Maura Murray forum and you basically told her she was repling on the wrong forumj

Judged:

4

2

2

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Yes Im serious. you are the one whom told this poor mother that has lost a young child whom was only replying to a poster as to what they about her that she was on the wrong forum. You just appear to have a chip on your shoulders no matter what the situation is.

Judged:

5

4

2

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
You're just going to keep it going aren't you.

Judged:

4

4

4

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
And who are you to tell me what I shouldn't have said?
Why are you making such a big deal out of this citigirl. I didn't do anything different that hasn't been done before yet I fail to remember anyone catching hel# for reminding someone that it was a forum about Maura.. I wasn't rude or nasty when I said that "maybe this should be taken to Patric's forum". Stop making a mountain out of a mole hill. No harm was meant by what I said.

Judged:

2

2

2

jwb wrote:

I think you should all be on the "View", this is a ridiculous Blog with nothing to offer but a cat/dog fight.There is not one post on this page that is not
slanted towards he said she said.I think it might be time to take a deep breath and sit back and wait for more evidence in the case to pop up because you are obviously all out of material.

Judged:

2

2

1

FrmLE wrote:

One thing to remember concerning dogs tracking, it is completely hit or miss and just because the dog lost the scent does in no way mean that is where the person was picked up. More than likely the dog tracked a scent for a while and the scent got weak or the dog simply got interested in something else.
I think there has been much misunderstanding about how dogs track and what it meant when he lost the scent. If I recall who was on that night, I am pretty certain the dog was not a hound, there are only a few hounds, it more than likely was a regular K9, I seem to think it was SP623? Anyone who knows feel free to offer up.

Judged:

2

2

FrmLE wrote:

One thing to remember concerning dogs tracking, it is completely hit or miss and just because the dog lost the scent does in no way mean that is where the person was picked up. More than likely the dog tracked a scent for a while and the scent got weak or the dog simply got interested in something else.
I think there has been much misunderstanding about how dogs track and what it meant when he lost the scent. If I recall who was on that night, I am pretty certain the dog was not a hound, there are only a few hounds, it more than likely was a regular K9, I seem to think it was SP623? Anyone who knows feel free to offer up.

Judged:

1

1

1

sophie bean wrote:

I'm not so sure that what the family has been doing is"throwing red herrings." If you had a relative who vanished, i don't know that you'd want every detial of their lives exposed to public scrutiny. I understand that a public inquiry does to some extent mean that there WILL be scrutiny, but I don't think they need to like it. It may be as simple as that. In precisely the same way (trying to avoid the use of caps), people in NH may not want to have their doors knocked upon, their premises searched, etc. and that doesn't mean that they are "throwing red herrings" either, does it? I simply think that we don't have enough actual evidence to say whether something is an intentional diversion or not. Something that seems odd to any of us may well have a perfectly innocent explanation.

Judged:

1

1

jwb wrote:

not to change gears but I haven't heard a word about the skull that was found in littleton.

Judged:

5

5

5

sophie bean wrote:

I'm not so sure that what the family has been doing is"throwing red herrings." If you had a relative who vanished, i don't know that you'd want every detial of their lives exposed to public scrutiny. I understand that a public inquiry does to some extent mean that there WILL be scrutiny, but I don't think they need to like it. It may be as simple as that. In precisely the same way (trying to avoid the use of caps), people in NH may not want to have their doors knocked upon, their premises searched, etc. and that doesn't mean that they are "throwing red herrings" either, does it? I simply think that we don't have enough actual evidence to say whether something is an intentional diversion or not. Something that seems odd to any of us may well have a perfectly innocent explanation.

Judged:

5

5

4

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
look, FC, EWB, Anne and several others have participated in throwing red hot herrings...for years. i don't think the subject is debatable. you and citigirl need not pretend to be so coy and puzzled.

Judged:

5

5

5

jwb wrote:

well put Snowy
I have one (ok more than one) thought to toss into the ring. If the last scent that the dogs picked up at the accident scene was BH road and the possibility that she was picked up in a vehicle at at that spot then wouldn't BA have seen this? Wasn't he supposed to be in his school bus that was parked in his driveway? Why did he have his wife call 9-11? Has it been determined if he would have been able to see the accident scene if he was in his driveway? BA wife just might have the key bit of info to fill in the gaps.