Maura Murray

i have challenge 4 benji
e-mail
NOW
4 details

Hugh Walker Black wrote:

i have challenge 4 benji
e-mail
NOW
4 details

Heh. Interesting. I have a challenge for Benji too.

Are you up for it?

Hugh Walker Black wrote:

red flag_myass..

your ass is not only a red flag but red from being pounded,

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
your ass is not only a red flag but red from being pounded,

Hi JWB would you be willing to send me a message?

Billy Vanderbilt wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi JWB would you be willing to send me a message?

sure

And who are you Billy V ? Why should I talk to you?

JWB wrote:

And who are you Billy V ? Why should I talk to you?

I would prefer to discuss in the message.

Thank you.

Never mind. Thank you for your communication. I understand.

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Well...Beagle had his stuff and property messed with. Just checking.
John

No, he didn't actually. Have you ever actually looked closely at the pics provided as 'evidence' or did I just glance em over & assume he was telling the truth?

Well look closely, that mower has NO damage to it at all whatsoever, looks like it's in great condition actually. & on top of the mower there is a big log carefully balanced to make it look like vandalism. That's a big log, maybe 40-50 easy, that thing would've smashed the crap outta that mower & certainly wouldn't be carefully resting atop an undamaged mower.

It's a total 100% hoax, straight up, great work detective.

Let's not forget he claimed the mower was vandalized first after talking to RC Stevens, then he said it happened after asking campus security about parking on campus & then the new story is it happened after he spoke to the body shop guy. Which is also a total lie, I spoke to the BSG & he said it was bullshit & not to believe everything that's on the Internet, advice you might want to heed yourself, detective.

jjholy posted to JR's blog entry "How You Can Help" on March 1, 2014 at 11:09 PM. his post is brilliant and insightful as he suggests an idea for JR to attempt to forge a cooperative bond with Fred Murray, although i imagine any potential trust between them was irretrievably shattered at the onset.
also, i suspect FM is the kind of guy that would demand your being for or against him; no middle ground.

jjholy grabs the bull by the horns by interpreting for others who aren't Boston, and perhaps, for others who are Boston, but haven't sloshed in the pond with the diversity that exists outside of the educational institutions, legal, medical and corporate world.

the unique cultures imbedded at Boston's various compass points / locations are often separated by a nearly imperceptible line…easily crossed.

one's originating birthplace, and the context of that sociological grouping, with all associated societal norms, becomes part of one's DNA. a fixed identity, it will always remain as one's comfort or discomfort zone. one's life experiences will continue to alter, by broadening or narrowing, one's perspective when looking outward.

jjholy writes:
"Weymouth and Brockton well route 18 south of 16b are rough neighborhoods , its dorchester with trees blue color hard working but if you say something about a family member you just might as well ignite the fuse. They travell in packs right or wrong you stand up for eachother on the south shore especially family."

JR might consider well what "holy" has to say.

similarly, FM went to NH with HIS cultural norms intact, and accuses, to this day, a "local dirtbag" for being responsible for his daughter's disappearance. that harsh and disrespectful approach, perhaps even unfounded, if not supported by facts and evidence, is the seed that has germinated this drama of ten years, and counting.

just another comment….

each time i see the age-progression photo of MM on that poster i find it jarring. i know someone dedicated time, effort and resources to create this, and has been applauded for that energy, but, sorry to say, it looks as though someone slapped on glasses and a blonde wig.

MM - was / is a pretty young woman….but that image just doesn't seem to fit.

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
No, he didn't actually. Have you ever actually looked closely at the pics provided as 'evidence' or did I just glance em over & assume he was telling the truth?
Well look closely, that mower has NO damage to it at all whatsoever, looks like it's in great condition actually. & on top of the mower there is a big log carefully balanced to make it look like vandalism. That's a big log, maybe 40-50 easy, that thing would've smashed the crap outta that mower & certainly wouldn't be carefully resting atop an undamaged mower.
It's a total 100% hoax, straight up, great work detective.
Let's not forget he claimed the mower was vandalized first after talking to RC Stevens, then he said it happened after asking campus security about parking on campus & then the new story is it happened after he spoke to the body shop guy. Which is also a total lie, I spoke to the BSG & he said it was bullshit & not to believe everything that's on the Internet, advice you might want to heed yourself, detective.

Yo....slow down Buddy.

I was just kidding around with Billy boy. I KNOW Beagle was just making it all up.

Calm down and freak out man....LOL

John

Step up to the plate benji you re not afraid of a challenge now are u?

U meet my challenge + I publish pier 4 pic of saturn feb 2 2004.

SnowyB wrote:

just another comment….
each time i see the age-progression photo of MM on that poster i find it jarring. i know someone dedicated time, effort and resources to create this, and has been applauded for that energy, but, sorry to say, it looks as though someone slapped on glasses and a blonde wig.
MM - was / is a pretty young woman….but that image just doesn't seem to fit.

While the picture might still be useful if she happened to change her hairstyle and/or disguised herself by wearing glasses I also think the age progression which should show after 10 years just isn't there. And yes it looks like the same picture of her only with a wig and glasses.

JWB wrote:

Wowzer-
So I went back and found where you actually stated that you saw marks either to trees or the snow after you went to the store the next day ( found a few weeks ago and can go back to get the actual if needed). I am not sure why you just couldn't come back and repeat what you saw.
Why are you on this forum if you can't even be real and honest yet you require that from everyone else?
I am not saying that you are involved but you play a very strange game for someone that can just keep it real and say what they saw etc,, I would believe you if you said I saw marks on the tree etc,,

If you found what I actually stated I saw then why do you want me to come back and repeat what I saw? You've got the answer so stop asking me over and over again.
I certainly don't have to answer to you about anything I saw, said, did, or repeat things to you so get over it and stop harassing me.

Go back to actual
Find it if real

benji, benji, bueller?

From Renner's blog:

"Aaron Swartz March 2, 2014 at 3:31 PM
Mr. Renner, I'm glad to hear that Jean Ellen Caccavaro was found alive and well.

Nevertheless, you're an unethical hack journalist for claiming that you were "struck by the resemblance between Maura and Jean." I am the sleuth who brought the Jean Ellen Caccavaro story to your attention in the comments section on this blog. I am the sleuth who discovered that Claude Moulton married Tina Caccavaro about a year after her mother, Jean Ellen Caccavaro, vanished in the Route 112 area.

Mr. Renner, you are an disingenous jackass!

James Renner March 2, 2014 at 3:34 PM
Why is everyone so eager to be angry? If you read the article, it clearly says I was not the person who found this info. I first read about the link on Websleuths and found the pic from a link, there. And yes, I was struck by the similarities. Who wouldn't be?"

I agree that Renner is a disingenuous jackass - he never, ever gives credit where credit is due.

Aaron Swartz has posted multiple times in Renner's blog comments giving all the details on the Caccavaro case/theory. It is clearly stated in the first post on Websleuths mentioning Caccavaro that the person got the information from the comments section on Renner's blog - from Websleuths:

"Nordicpete
On quite another note:
There is right now quite a discussion going on at the James Renner Maura Murray web site regarding a VT lady, Jean Caccovaro ... "

Yet Renner doesn't have the courtesy to give credit to the person who originally shared the information on his own blog.

Renner really treats his followers disrespectfully. There have been many comments over the last several months on his blog asking him to clarify his statement that he knew were Maura was, where she went and who she went with. He ignored all of them until yesterday and still didn't answer the question. These are the people that support him, that contributed money to his Gofundme campaign, yet he can't be bothered to answer their questions.

But he has no problem answering the same questions put to him by non-Renner fans on Reddit a few weeks ago (edited for space):

"whorseyouwroteidon
I'm not saying there isn't something fishy about Fred, but Renner has definitely sensationalized some aspects of the case. Just within the last month, he had everyone convinced he had located Maura in Canada ...
JamesRenner
I never said I was convinced, actually. I was following leads about Maura being in Canada which were on the internet for years but not followed up on by friends, family, or police. In fact, we met a couple people in Sherbrooke who were convinced they had recently seen Maura. I still remain unconvinced that she is in Canada but it definitely generated some new leads ..."

Even though there were many insults made against him in the Reddit thread, it appears he thought enough of those people to at least give some type of answer.

Yet, when somebody on his blog calls him out on ignoring their comments, and attributing their research to somebody else, he blames them for being "eager to be angry." It is always somebody's else who is wrong, it's always somebody else's problem, not his.

He owes Aaron Swartz an apology.

And what's with including James Caccavaro's disgusting comments about Maura and Fred? Does Renner have any information that Caccavaro knew either one of them? If not, then why include his statements that must come directly out of his ass?

Oh, wait, I know why. Because they are derogatory about Maura and Fred. It's what Renner thrives on.

Despicable.