Maura Murray

Judged:

1

Tyler in Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
Maruchan,
I will address your concerns. But between my explanation of this as well as my explanation of your last theory regarding me (that I was intentionally registering new accounts for some gain which now slips my mind)-- perhaps you will come to see that I have better judgement than given credit for.
I did not want to nor planned on addressing the "Billy" controversy. And I will only do so briefly. "Billy Vanderbilt" contacted me several weeks ago. He claimed he was an IT student at Carnegie Mellon, a local university here in Pittsburgh. He said he had been lurking around Topix since seeing the Maura episode of Disappeared. He thought, given his skill set, that he may be able to help us identify the individual who has been sending death threats to posters around this community. After I verified he was who he claimed to be, I sent him the email headers from two emails which I had received from the individual who threatened Sam. That was the only information I sent him and that was basically the end of our correspondence. What actions he took from that point forward, I can't speak to.
Someone threatened Sam in a very serious manner. I consider Sam a friend and intend to help him by any means possible. Vanderbilt seemed like a good option. I acted alone in providing Billy with the headers and do not regret my decision. Both headers came directly from the individual who is making death threats.
I, genuinely, have no interest in identifying any other Topix poster ("Suzanne" as an exception). More than a handful of names have fallen into my lap over the course of the last several months throughout general conversations I have had with longtime followers of this thread and this case. Want to know what I have done with them each time? Nothing. Why would I care who posters to a message board are? It's just not important. It has nothing to do with the means of Maura's disappearance therefore I am not interested.
I hope this relieves your concern. It's the truth.

Judged:

2

2

B00gerGr33n wrote:

<quoted text>
All of the people that share this account will forgive you for talking to him.

Judged:

2

2

1

Not Without Peril wrote:

<quoted text>
That reminds me of something that Wormser once said. You will have to forgive me for talking to him too.

Judged:

2

2

1

B00gerGr33n wrote:

<quoted text>
Which also reminds one of us (admittedly I don't remember) that Skuni overheard someone say.

Judged:

2

2

2

Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>
[T]he last time I was in touch with [Ben] was a good couple of years ago, and at that time he had "moved on" from discussions of MM and had no further wish to be contacted or involved.

Skunki wrote:

<quoted text>
I have no idea what you are talking about.

BilIy Vanderbilt wrote:

Send lawyerz gunz and benji!

Judged:

4

4

3

Not Without Peril wrote:

<quoted text>
The reason I first wanted to speak with Ben: http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2012/02/does-... .
I don't think Topix is stupid and pointless. I probably have the biggest Topix archive of anyone here. I have four threads saved and two programs I use to search it. I do prefer the Blog format because I like the organization it provides. Topix has virtually no organization.
Why don't go read up on this case and then come back.

Judged:

1

1

1

Wolfi Wolf wrote:

<quoted text>
I know!

Judged:

3

2

2

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
In that last line are you really trying to tell me to go read up on this case & then come back?? LOL, you can't be serious can you?
I've been posting aBout this case since '04 on the original MM.com forum before it even became MMM.com , I've probably read every article available on this case, I think if anyone has to read up here it's you.
Before you even read up on this case maybe you should start with basic definitions, like what constitute evidence & even info regarding a case.
You have this warped sense of perception that learning about the people who are posting about a case is the same thing as learning info about the case itself, which is such a stupid notion it's ridiculous. I don't think I even need to get into it, if you can't grasp that concept then idk what to tell u.
You proved you don't understand this with your whole thing about Suzanne/observer/Ben or whoever. Finding out who this person is, or if they're the same person, or whatever you're trying to figure out is NOT information pertaining to MM, it's info about someone who's commenting on the case online, HUGE dfference. You literally stated that you were finding out info about the case by determining this was the same person, or whatever you were doing. That is so ridiculous, come on dude.
I don't need to follow that stupid link because I've read almost all of the comments on that blog, & most of em are idiotic & I don't need to read them again. And it has nothing to do with the case, it will bring nobody closer to solving the mystery.
You need to seriously go back to the basics & reexamine exactly what you're trying to figure out here.

Judged:

4

4

4

Not Without Peril wrote:

I meant to write: Why don't *you* go read up on this case and then come back.
Ben wrote a report regarding observer. I (with the help of Maruchan) established that "Suzanne" was observer. I then got threatened by "pomkik" who, I think, is "Suzanne" or is connected to her.

Judged:

3

3

2

Jenkins wrote:

I don't know who Ben is.