Maura Murray

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
How old are you? This is why you are not a good PI, you spend way too much time lighting up like a Christmas tree when you are in the spotlight and embarrassingly sounding stupid.

just because someone says they are a detective, a count, a JAG, a pilot, policeman, princess, CEO or COO….doesn't mean they are. even if they believe they are acting in any of those roles. recall….The Great Imposter. pretending is better than the reality of mucking stalls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

IF You really are who I think.....

You met me and You know the truth. Why are You trying to disassociate yourself from our brief meeting @ The Dutch Treat in Franconia.

Still here Snowy.....mucking the stalls.

Who hired You Missy..?

John

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
just because someone says they are a detective, a count, a JAG, a pilot, policeman, princess, CEO or COO….doesn't mean they are. even if they believe they are acting in any of those roles. recall….The Great Imposter. pretending is better than the reality of mucking stalls.

Hey......you are the internet sleuth.

But not a very good one...Sorry.

You are wrong....

John

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yah right. Its just a coincidence?

Det Columbo wrote:

I am not the spammer.
John
<quoted text>

I spam.
Because I give a damn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Franklin D. Roosevelt Speech (WW2 in HD Ending): http://youtu.be/NygesJGqIdw

I'll let someone else's words speak to the evil of unnecessary infighting.

I stand in resolve and I stand in protest.

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yah right. Its just a coincidence?

Yes it is. And it is with respect that I say there is a lesson to be learned by this, by all of us.

Saturday lessons......??

Schooling is not over I guess.!

John

Ashdown wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes it is. And it is with respect that I say there is a lesson to be learned by this, by all of us.

Actually....I think this is pretty much the funniest thing I have ever read on Renner's forum.

John Smth

"John GreenApril 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM

I have one question. It is based on the assumption that my interpretation of James' post is correct. To wit: his error stemmed from the fact that two people had used the handle "Detective Columbo": John Healy on Topix and this wolfman character a few years ago on a different blog. Thereafter, in getting an email from the address associated with that blog, the emailer appeared to be trying to convince Renner that he was Healy.

If I have this correct, I feel there is another interpretation of the events. It could be that the carnival guy, wolfman, is not involved and that Healy is simply posing as him.

Am I missing something here? I admit that I don't grasp the sequence of events around James' confusion. Can anyone clarify for me? Is my offered alternative theory possible?

~ John Green"

Happy Spring, Emmett!
you make good points….i'd like to respond.

you write:***The idea that people posting on a message board actually had something to do with anything in connection with this case is absurd... It's been 10 years & they know it's monitored by police & masking your IP is nothing to the cops…***

this unfortunate mentality, to my understanding, evolved from the idea that Maura, herself, or "the dirtbag" has/ will / is show(n)(ing) up on various sites dedicated to MM.
it originated from her family and their avid (duck) supporters; the original MMM people.
that's not an unreasonable concept, until it's taken well beyond the limits of….reason.
the evidence of chaos and disordered thinking is all around you / us.
if it is one's own family mbr….you bet it makes sense to behave in the ways that FM has behaved. i get that. until someone has walked in his shoes….well, you know.
still, no excuse for strangers-trying-to-help to be abused over the years; or, the reverse, for the family to be abused. when, if ever, will it end?
ok…that was random thinking.

maybe your next idea can break the ice between all of us, except there is so much paranoia flying that it is nearly dangerous to reveal one's interests….i said needlework once and shit-for-brains has been on my case every since.
he/she might show up at my door in a crocheted dress.
here's more fodder….i love brunch! make a splendid quiche!(fontina cheese is the secret)….bloody marys and champagne (for occasions, only….no sat nite rants associated with my habits).

you wrote:***Tbh.. I'd LOVE to see some REAL NEWS ABOUT MAURA! But there is none... Every scenario has been done to death.. Why can't we talk about fun things? I got interested in New England by watching shows on tv & seen the natural beauty... Even talked to a few here about moving up yonder.. That's why I keep coming back.. For real news, people I've met, & to laugh... But not be insulted for no reason! I've been respectful the last couple years…***

a great idea, Emmett! i mean…Troy…..i mean….whomever you are, you stinkin' imposter!!!(just kidding). yes, let's talk about fun things. ;)

Det Columbo wrote:

Actually....I think this is pretty much the funniest thing I have ever read on Renner's forum.
John Smth
"John GreenApril 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM
I have one question. It is based on the assumption that my interpretation of James' post is correct. To wit: his error stemmed from the fact that two people had used the handle "Detective Columbo": John Healy on Topix and this wolfman character a few years ago on a different blog. Thereafter, in getting an email from the address associated with that blog, the emailer appeared to be trying to convince Renner that he was Healy.
If I have this correct, I feel there is another interpretation of the events. It could be that the carnival guy, wolfman, is not involved and that Healy is simply posing as him.
Am I missing something here? I admit that I don't grasp the sequence of events around James' confusion. Can anyone clarify for me? Is my offered alternative theory possible?
~ John Green"

WTH is John Green talking about? and why is he talking about what he is talking about?
these "investigative" journalists are barking up the wrong trees…the ones without the blue bow.
what is he smoking?

I would like to reply to this post at Renner's forum but He will not let me post. Only team members may post.

John Smith

"TDLApril 4, 2014 at 12:34 PM

Finally, to John Wolfman Smith directly, I, and I think I can safely say we as a community, would like you to respond to these allegations:

1) Are you posting on this blog or on Topix as Aaron Swartz?

2) Do you know Alden Olson and what is the nature of that relationship (aware of his posts on Topix, friendly on Facebook, friendly in real life)?

3) Did you specifically choose to post on Topix as "Det Columbo" to impersonate the private investigator who has worked on this case named John Healy, who used a similar nickname on Topix before you did?

If you are willing to address these questions without criticizing James Renner, I believe he will let your comments stand and you will have a much better chance of this community listening to what you have to say."

Det Columbo wrote:

I would like to reply to this post at Renner's forum but He will not let me post. Only team members may post.
John Smith
"TDLApril 4, 2014 at 12:34 PM
Finally, to John Wolfman Smith directly, I, and I think I can safely say we as a community, would like you to respond to these allegations:
1) Are you posting on this blog or on Topix as Aaron Swartz?
2) Do you know Alden Olson and what is the nature of that relationship (aware of his posts on Topix, friendly on Facebook, friendly in real life)?
3) Did you specifically choose to post on Topix as "Det Columbo" to impersonate the private investigator who has worked on this case named John Healy, who used a similar nickname on Topix before you did?
If you are willing to address these questions without criticizing James Renner, I believe he will let your comments stand and you will have a much better chance of this community listening to what you have to say."

I have a question. First Green, and then this poster, say that Healy posted on Topix as Det Columbo.

Where did they get this idea?

Ashdown wrote:

These games of deception and the taste for speculation must stop. This tastless disregard for each other is fueled by minds that imagine evil, project it upon others.
This discustingly evil satisfaction in which one can trick his fellow man into misery is a wicked burden that will pave your destiny. It is a deceptive path to self destruction.
This investigation deserves no priviledge or platform, it only has a record of harm in retribution for good intention.
I do not support it. I oppose it completely.

the deception, insults and instigations are made so much worse when they are carried to Topix from Renner's blog.
i think he / they take up enough space right where they are, and the collective "they" has still been able to grasp the history of what came before them.
it's amusing to see the sheeple "develop" their knowledge base from Topix snippets, launch into speculation and fantasies from Topix snippets, and, still, can never get it right.
Renner was better off when he pursued his own research. the book should have been written /completed by now.

That is My question directly to them as well...But I am unable to post @ Renner's at this point.

Going to start My own topix forum for this insanity.

Then nothing can be erased by the poster....only by topix admin. whoever that may be.

John

Not Without Peril wrote:

<quoted text>
I have a question. First Green, and then this poster, say that Healy posted on Topix as Det Columbo.
Where did they get this idea?

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/franconia-nh/...

This is My new forum I just started today.

John Smith

Even IF You are not a fan of James' this stuff is funny..! Wild goose chase indeed...! JMHO

http://catchingsalinger.wordpress.com/2009/08...

Det Columbo wrote:

IF You really are who I think.....
You met me and You know the truth. Why are You trying to disassociate yourself from our brief meeting @ The Dutch Treat in Franconia.
Still here Snowy.....mucking the stalls.
Who hired You Missy..?
John
<quoted text>

if i met you, i didn't necessarily examine your credentials. eventually, someone offered (unsolicited) info that it wasn't the "truth".

it seems disingenuous for you to make accusations against various individuals over many years about the disappearance of MM.
that you flip around like a fish, pointing in one direction, then another, tells me you don't know what you're talking about, and that you don't mind sullying the reputation of people you know in your area.
you stir the pot, and keep it just under boiling.
why?
there is no evidence to suggest a local / dirtbag took her, but you've been playing it for years.
i just think that's irresponsible.
at the same time, if no one else cares to challenge what you present, that's all good, too.

The evidence will show in the end......and then we will discuss this further.

Thanx....John smith

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
if i met you, i didn't necessarily examine your credentials. eventually, someone offered (unsolicited) info that it wasn't the "truth".
it seems disingenuous for you to make accusations against various individuals over many years about the disappearance of MM.
that you flip around like a fish, pointing in one direction, then another, tells me you don't know what you're talking about, and that you don't mind sullying the reputation of people you know in your area.
you stir the pot, and keep it just under boiling.
why?
there is no evidence to suggest a local / dirtbag took her, but you've been playing it for years.
i just think that's irresponsible.
at the same time, if no one else cares to challenge what you present, that's all good, too.