Maura Murray

Judged:

1

SnowyB wrote:

i've sold my cheap seat to Pomkik.

Donna House wrote:

I dislike this Renner character. I think the guy's a creep. The day his book hits the shelves, one of you folks really ought to scan it and publish it on the World Wide Web. Catch my drift? ;)
The rest of you folks ought to take the cue and download it A.S.A.P. Still with me?
Instead of lining the creep's pockets, donate the cost of the book to a charity! Play your cards right, he'll sell one copy to the entire Topix team. That's all from me for now Franconia!

Not Without Apparel wrote:

I got clothes

Judged:

1

Maruchan wrote:

So many here seem to be almost gleefully taking this opportunity to attack Columbo, and therefore turning the conversation away from where it should be, on Renner's continued actions to hunt down, defame, and reveal personal information about anybody that criticizes him. Some of you actually defend Renner's tactics, on the grounds that Columbo deserves it, in your eyes.
I wonder how you would feel if it was your good name, your face, your employer, your friends, that were attacked in the same way? All because you expressed criticism and anger at what you perceived to be unwarranted attacks against people you knew or even complete strangers? And when you tried to voice those opinions, you were defamed and silenced?
But wait ... that's what happened to many of you on the old MMM forum, right? You've been here and on other forums talking about it for years - not being able to state your opinion if it went against the "Murray family line," and being banned for stating that opinion. That anger is still right here today, that anger at being silenced.
But when Columbo does the same thing, it is not only OK for his voice to be silenced at Renner's blog, it is OK for Renner to publish not only his personal information, but to try to make Columbo look like a pervert and drag in yet another innocent party completely unconnected to anything in this case and defame them as well. It's not only OK, it is right and just. It is not only right and just, it is a time to shout, "ha, ha, Columbo, see what you get for stating your opinions, karma baby, karma."
I am glad that some can see beyond their grudges against Columbo, who, although they have no love lost for him, still stand up for what is ACTUALLY right and just. They are able to stand back and address the real, important issue of a "journalist" who will stop at nothing to RETALIATE against anybody who criticizes him, who will BLACKMAIL somebody by saying if you don't play nice, I will continue to bring harm to those innocents who you have some connection with until you shut your mouth. I will post photographs of totally unrelated innocent people that I believe are you, until I recognize my error, then, without admitting that error, without issuing an *Update* to announce that error, I will quietly switch out the photograph of the innocent party to put in a photograph of the actual person that is pissing me off. I will make up relationships that don't exist to make you look worse.
The enormous difference between anything Columbo has done or said and what Renner does is the degree of INFLUENCE each has in the world. Not to add to his already huge ego, Renner is now one of the people who is always interviewed about Maura Murray. That public exposure gives him a large audience, and the things he says, true or not, will reach many people. Without condoning anything Columbo may have done in the past, his opinions were confined to a few forums - his reach was small. There is no comparison at all to the harm Columbo may have caused and the harm Renner is capable of causing.
<quoted text>
When? Once? Twice? The number of Renner's non-retractions dwarfs any feeble attempt he has made in a couple of instances to "retract" his "unfortunate, careless." false, mean, cruel, false, vindictive, petty, manipulative, false, obsessive, paranoid, false "statements and accusations."
Again, thanks to those who kept their eye on the ball.
Spell-check may now begin.

Judged:

3

3

3

Maruchan wrote:

So many here seem to be almost gleefully taking this opportunity to attack Columbo, and therefore turning the conversation away from where it should be, on Renner's continued actions to hunt down, defame, and reveal personal information about anybody that criticizes him. Some of you actually defend Renner's tactics, on the grounds that Columbo deserves it, in your eyes.
I wonder how you would feel if it was your good name, your face, your employer, your friends, that were attacked in the same way? All because you expressed criticism and anger at what you perceived to be unwarranted attacks against people you knew or even complete strangers? And when you tried to voice those opinions, you were defamed and silenced?
But wait ... that's what happened to many of you on the old MMM forum, right? You've been here and on other forums talking about it for years - not being able to state your opinion if it went against the "Murray family line," and being banned for stating that opinion. That anger is still right here today, that anger at being silenced.
But when Columbo does the same thing, it is not only OK for his voice to be silenced at Renner's blog, it is OK for Renner to publish not only his personal information, but to try to make Columbo look like a pervert and drag in yet another innocent party completely unconnected to anything in this case and defame them as well. It's not only OK, it is right and just. It is not only right and just, it is a time to shout, "ha, ha, Columbo, see what you get for stating your opinions, karma baby, karma."
I am glad that some can see beyond their grudges against Columbo, who, although they have no love lost for him, still stand up for what is ACTUALLY right and just. They are able to stand back and address the real, important issue of a "journalist" who will stop at nothing to RETALIATE against anybody who criticizes him, who will BLACKMAIL somebody by saying if you don't play nice, I will continue to bring harm to those innocents who you have some connection with until you shut your mouth. I will post photographs of totally unrelated innocent people that I believe are you, until I recognize my error, then, without admitting that error, without issuing an *Update* to announce that error, I will quietly switch out the photograph of the innocent party to put in a photograph of the actual person that is pissing me off. I will make up relationships that don't exist to make you look worse.
The enormous difference between anything Columbo has done or said and what Renner does is the degree of INFLUENCE each has in the world. Not to add to his already huge ego, Renner is now one of the people who is always interviewed about Maura Murray. That public exposure gives him a large audience, and the things he says, true or not, will reach many people. Without condoning anything Columbo may have done in the past, his opinions were confined to a few forums - his reach was small. There is no comparison at all to the harm Columbo may have caused and the harm Renner is capable of causing.
<quoted text>
When? Once? Twice? The number of Renner's non-retractions dwarfs any feeble attempt he has made in a couple of instances to "retract" his "unfortunate, careless." false, mean, cruel, false, vindictive, petty, manipulative, false, obsessive, paranoid, false "statements and accusations."
Again, thanks to those who kept their eye on the ball.
Spell-check may now begin.

Judged:

1

sofiee Bean wrote:

<quoted text>
H0w u b33n?

Judged:

2

2

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll tell you what since you care so much about CTP being mentioned. You apologize to those that you have made garbage remarks to, or have insinuated of being involved even though you probably had no evidence to think such a thing but decided to suggest it on a public forum. If you apologize I'll send an email to JR and offer a "donation" to get that name removed.
So really you will be committing two good deeds with one post. Why wouldn't you take me up on this offer.
Just my opinion.

Judged:

1

1

1

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
yes, a good point, but i don't excuse DC.
i bristle at the support DC is receiving for his whining when, in fact, both have been toying with each other about the "Wolfman" character, which, in itself, brings negative attention to the business owner.
both are wrong….i'd say equally wrong….in the despicable way they've used / involved this family business.

Judged:

2

1

Maruchan wrote:

The enormous difference between anything Columbo has done or said and what Renner does is the degree of INFLUENCE each has in the world. Not to add to his already huge ego, Renner is now one of the people who is always interviewed about Maura Murray. That public exposure gives him a large audience, and the things he says, true or not, will reach many people. Without condoning anything Columbo may have done in the past, his opinions were confined to a few forums - his reach was small. There is no comparison at all to the harm Columbo may have caused and the harm Renner is capable of causing.
<quoted text>
When? Once? Twice? The number of Renner's non-retractions dwarfs any feeble attempt he has made in a couple of instances to "retract" his "unfortunate, careless." false, mean, cruel, false, vindictive, petty, manipulative, false, obsessive, paranoid, false "statements and accusations."
Again, thanks to those who kept their eye on the ball.
Spell-check may now begin.

Judged:

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

First of all I will not apologize for things I have said. I said them and I own them
Second..........Stick Your offer up your ass.
There how's this for a reply.
Probably lose more respect on w/ this reply BUT You Lighthouse are and have been a pain in My arse and now Ya wanna help Me. Get the hell outta here you 2 faced loser.
Friends with Mr. Renner I see, how convenient.
That is all.
John Smith
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

1

Ridiculous wrote:

Another thing,
Calling someone who has worked as a character actor at a family run tourist attraction a carney is an attempt at discrediting both the person and the business. The connotation is intended to add some sleaze to both. Whats more interesting however, is the glimpse it gives us into JR's research methods....CTP...A carnival.....Sheesh, I suppose The Cog railway is the american version of Uerail!

Judged:

2

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Maruchan - please take this with respect:
You can't take DC being wrong and Renner being wrong and then try to say which one is more right or wrong, or which one is more pressing.
You don't like Renner so you are going to make him look more like a villian.
I don't like either and feel that no matter all the crying that DC does about this it should be remembered that he was insinuating that some people were responsible in a girl going missing. That to me is a pretty serious thing that if he has no evidence should apologize for. You are making it seem like Det Columbo gave James Renner a bad "yelp" review. What he did and has been doing for years has been very serious. Even now when he can get a chance to see the "damage" he will still not apologize for his years of doing this.

Judged:

2

2

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not friends with Mr. Renner - I have never spoke to him before in my life.
Had you cleared the name of some people that you have accussed by your stupid games of murder and or kidnapping on the internet..........yes I would have pleaded with JR to take the post down.
Terrible that you can't apologize for it now right? I mean the poor local business suffering. The man in cruiser 001 "who knows the real story" and has a trailer hitch and can't find the crash scene. You don't care about him right just the local business.

Judged:

2

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not friends with Mr. Renner - I have never spoke to him before in my life.
Had you cleared the name of some people that you have accussed by your stupid games of murder and or kidnapping on the internet..........yes I would have pleaded with JR to take the post down.
Terrible that you can't apologize for it now right? I mean the poor local business suffering. The man in cruiser 001 "who knows the real story" and has a trailer hitch and can't find the crash scene. You don't care about him right just the local business.