Maura Murray

Judged:

4

3

2

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
How could she possibly know? She said she met Maura "once a long time ago". This does not sound to me as if she would be privy to Maura's last minute and spontaneous decisions. The question is why does this matter so much to this one poster? If Maura decided to buy and use a tracfone why would she tell anyone? She's an intelligent and independent adult and does not need permission or approval. She could buy it without anyone ever knowing it if she paid cash.

Judged:

3

2

2

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Im sorry it doesnt fit into your theory but Maura had one phone only and it was not a tracfone.

Judged:

4

2

2

whiston wrote:

hi citigirl and all,do you know when Maura got the missing cellphone.I am thinking it was christmas 2003 and if so how did she call people before she had it.Also we were told she got prepaid calling cards at some point,why would she need both.take care philip

Judged:

3

3

2

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
How could she possibly know? She said she met Maura "once a long time ago". This does not sound to me as if she would be privy to Maura's last minute and spontaneous decisions. The question is why does this matter so much to this one poster? If Maura decided to buy and use a tracfone why would she tell anyone? She's an intelligent and independent adult and does not need permission or approval. She could buy it without anyone ever knowing it if she paid cash.

Judged:

3

2

looking4amoose wrote:

<quoted text>
Citi, the only way you could possibly know this for sure is if you are Maura. Are you Maura?

Judged:

3

2

1

whiston wrote:

hi citigirl and all,do you know when Maura got the missing cellphone.I am thinking it was christmas 2003 and if so how did she call people before she had it.Also we were told she got prepaid calling cards at some point,why would she need both.take care philip

Judged:

3

2

2

looking4amoose wrote:

<quoted text>
Citi, the only way you could possibly know this for sure is if you are Maura. Are you Maura?

Judged:

5

2

2

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>I asked another family member whom would know. Yes I did say I met Maura in the past but I did not say only once. You were the one who posted about the tracfone and this is what I was replying to. It was your theory not mine.

looking4amoose wrote:

<quoted text>I know that you want to think that Maura shared everything with her family, but really, if they knew everything, they would also know why she was travelling through Haverhill the night she disappeared. Maybe she didn't shared a second phone # with them? I wonder how Hossein got in touch with her.

Judged:

2

2

2

looking4amoose wrote:

<quoted text>I know that you want to think that Maura shared everything with her family, but really, if they knew everything, they would also know why she was travelling through Haverhill the night she disappeared. Maybe she didn't shared a second phone # with them? I wonder how Hossein got in touch with her.

Judged:

4

2

2

just me wrote:

I agree that there doesn't seem to be any way to know anything for sure in this case. People didn't know what she was up to, and with whom. Weren't you also a bit suprised by some of the things Mr Renner has been able to uncover?
I realize you do hold maura most high, and you really just want her to be found. We do too, even if it means finding out that Maura kept alot more than thought so, to herself. Maybe people really did wonder at UMASS on Monday night. Maybe one of those people was the super....maybe the one who got back her scrubs.....it's too hard to know and I hope you will open your mind up to most every posibility. Maura does not need to be defended. We are more forgiving than that and it's nice for a change to see so much info that might matter, coming to the surface.
I only mean this in the most heartfelt way.
Linda

Judged:

6

4

4

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
i think it's fair to say that the covering-up seems to be the greater motivation than "finding" maura. facts and details exist, but they are either spun or held closely.
over time, Linda, you and another long-time poster have witnessed the preposterous efforts by "family" members....none more closely related than "distant"....who have limited conversation and have actively engaged in the equivalent of brain washing. forum commenters have paraphrased and repeated information about M and her disappearance that has never been verified to be true. those days are over.
an important question remains, then. why has this group of people engaged in this behavior? what is the payoff for them? what, exactly, have they been trying to cover-up? why wouldn't MM's disappearance be more important than any behavior or action for which she might be judged or misjudged by the public?
some of us have been calling them out for some time now. maybe renner, when he returns, will have the potential to more effectively do the same...to get at the truth.

Judged:

5

3

2

kitten wrote:

You know, I think I have met Maura more times than Citigirl, and I only served her coffee. I read this entire forum last night, and the only purpose CG is serving is to rile everyone up. It keeps us from focusing on what's important. Her very PRESENCE here is a red herring.(Normally I only post in Amherst, but man has she got my Irish up right now.) Citigirl, I don't doubt you're related. I don't doubt you've met MM and feel close to the situation. But it is simply impossible that you know all the facts you claim to. You know the official canon inside and out, yes. But your continuous inability to think critically is getting annoying. From the perspective of someone who has advocated for MM for years (I began the wiki article, which tracks back to my real name, so no lies here) I find it completely frustrating that you continually claim knowledge that isn't supported anywhere.
Anyone who claims definitive knowledge and it posting around on the internet should be ashamed. The only way Citigirl knows more than any of us here is if she's revealing things that are supposed to be still under investigation. I am so, so sick of the Facebook forum crowd who refuses to accept that there are more questions about this case than answers. We're all complicated human beings, and to paint Maura as some kind of saintly n'er do wrong is not only inaccurate but blatantly disseminates misinformation. No one's perfect, and until we have a better idea of what was going wrong in her personal life, we'll never know what happened.
And I am prepared to take my licks for posting out of turn. Huge respect to the posters who have kept the faith all this time.

just me wrote:

<quoted text>What in Renner's inquiry seems most relevant to you? Well, that Maura was looking up info about the effects of alcohol on a fetus. Mr Renner says it most definately did not relate to any studies she was into at the time. Too tired to elaborate.....just wanted to touch somewhat on all of your questions
What might be relevant?
That she was trying to get out of the pregnancy, or some kind of jam and either didn't know what to do or was meeting up with someone to discuss it maybe? It could be relevant if the person was married and didn't want any of this in the picture.
What about a FL investiagtor's insistence that a possible (deceased) suspect in the CT Valley cases is apparently the probably-mythical "Suspect Zero"?
Oh, I don't think she believes that, she just has other things she can pin on this guy and can name all the times he was living, visiting at/near/or around NH and VT. She also continues to look at Rooney as well.
What about a former (deceased) "investigator's" inferrences that it was another (unspecified)sort of event?
Like some have said, maybe she knew something they didn't.
And just a note here, cause I've got to get going, The PI in FL has all the credentials. When she blew the lid off what Beth was trying to do, or doing, she was able to see that Beth had no business in this because she was not what she claimed to be. Maybe Helena knew this, and did not care, and maybe it was all a suprise to her. And I agree, "Silky" was vague. She used to say she flew under the radar.
Lastly, because I have those first few emails between Helena and Beth,(and know of 2 others), it WAS Helena who sought Beth out. The things Beth had to say about this person and that person, and the way she said it, worded it, must have really been impressive. Helena told me she didn't really know what to think when she first met Beth. But they became team leaders, for lack of a better word.
It doesn't really matter much now to discuss theses two people any longer and I really should stress it's just my opinion.

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Post by Peripeteia from an old forum:
"information from the Dectective at the University of Mass, learned that on the night Maura went missing several of her friends approached a campus police security to assist in the search for her in the Residence."

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
feb 2010

Judged:

1

1

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
I believe it was in the fall of 2009, not sure though. I also recall someone posting this lead supposedly didn´t pan out.
Regarding the skull found in Littleton, dna testing could take months if not a prioritized case. I´m surprised though nothing has been said about any exam results of a forensic anthropologist, which is usually made in cases like this. They should at the very least be able to tell if adult or not and if male or female. Also, a dental comparison should not take very long and would be an easy way to rule Maura in or out. Provided the sakull had teeth, of course.

Judged:

2

1

1

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
Tracfones are often associated with criminal activity, so maybe LE seized it as evidence when they were searching the vacant Saturn.