Maura Murray

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Lauren you have good thoughts and ideas keep pluggin

Thank you.

Here's an article stating that she cracked the windshield with her head. Hope the link works.
www.pimagazine.com/books/B185_surveillance_se...

pimagazine.com/books/B185_surveillance_secret...

Not going to work but if you look at their website it has a short blurb about Maura.

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
Tracfones are often associated with criminal activity, so maybe LE seized it as evidence when they were searching the vacant Saturn.

Maura had one phone and it was not a tracfone.

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Maura had one phone and it was not a tracfone.

amen.

jwb wrote:

yea i know I said i would not post again but this case is just nawing on my obsesive compulsive disorder (lol)we travel the area on bike alot and it makes you think when you see the blue ribbon

since you were so happy to take a swing at me, i'd say your OCD is in line with other pseudonyms...and is code for duck talk. just sayin.

WTH-the-original wrote:

I just kind of figured people finally got tired of the pointless windmilling?
Nothing useful happening here, move along....
In memory of SBD
Bill

every time i open topix i see this post....and am inclined to reply in the affirmative. and then i look at the date.

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Maura had one phone and it was not a tracfone.

How could u know this? If she paid cash, there is no way that could be known.

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
How could u know this? If she paid cash, there is no way that could be known.

Im sorry it doesnt fit into your theory but Maura had one phone only and it was not a tracfone.

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree. I have one when I feel I need extreme privacy. I use my iPhone for everything else. I'm just saying how LE tends to think of them..

in your previous posting you basically accused people whom have tracfones with criminal intent. And you have stated that you have one for extreme privacy. interesting.

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Im sorry it doesnt fit into your theory but Maura had one phone only and it was not a tracfone.

How could u possibly know this?

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>in your previous posting you basically accused people whom have tracfones with criminal intent. And you have stated that you have one for extreme privacy. interesting.

If u actually read my post, u would see that I NEVER, NEVER, NEVER said that. I said LE often thinks that way. Read my posts. Slowly. Concentrate. Think. I noticed that u did this post as a way of evading my question ... How do u know Maura did not have a Tracfone? There's no way u could possibly know, if she paid cash. U are becoming tiresome and boring and appear to have an MMM type agenda. U are making me yawn from your predictability.

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>in your previous posting you basically accused people whom have tracfones with criminal intent. And you have stated that you have one for extreme privacy. interesting.

Oh, come on now citygirl. There are lots of good reasons not to give a real or major email addy too. Sometimes you just can't trust that you should let someone to have access to your cell phone number. Signing up for a new truck, taking online surveys, the list goes on in my mind why a person might do this in extreme cases where you don't reaaly want to give up your privacy. So far us cellphone users don't get the calls for free insulation inspection, etc. I don't think this means much at all, and you didn't need to make it seem sinister.

I agree that there doesn't seem to be any way to know anything for sure in this case. People didn't know what she was up to, and with whom. Weren't you also a bit suprised by some of the things Mr Renner has been able to uncover?
I realize you do hold maura most high, and you really just want her to be found. We do too, even if it means finding out that Maura kept alot more than thought so, to herself. Maybe people really did wonder at UMASS on Monday night. Maybe one of those people was the super....maybe the one who got back her scrubs.....it's too hard to know and I hope you will open your mind up to most every posibility. Maura does not need to be defended. We are more forgiving than that and it's nice for a change to see so much info that might matter, coming to the surface.
I only mean this in the most heartfelt way.

Linda

just me wrote:

<quoted text>Thank you, then that rumor can be put to rest. I saw mention of that on Advocates forum and Topix, and have always wondered if NH police called UMASS that night after all.

The Saturn's parking sticker was for the 2003-2004 school year, lot 12. Which does not mean the Saturn was always parked there.

If Haverhill PD did not call UMass PD, then it seems at least possible to likely that someone at the Haverhill PD decided against calling UMass PD to find out whose sticker was on the car.

I fully understand and appreciate WTH/Bill's view that there are very, very often cars left on the side of the road by intoxicated drivers trying to evade police. Truly, it happens a lot. But on the other hand, the history of this behavior is no reason for a police officer to jump to the conclusion that an abandoned car in Haverhill NH, at least three hours from its regular parking in MA, is not worth a phone call to UMass PD. A Haverhill police officer should have made a note of the parking sticker number and called UMass to check things out. It's virtually impossible that a Haverhill police officer looked closely at an abandoned car in NH and did not realize that it would normally have been parked three hours south.

just me wrote:

I agree that there doesn't seem to be any way to know anything for sure in this case. People didn't know what she was up to, and with whom. Weren't you also a bit suprised by some of the things Mr Renner has been able to uncover?
I realize you do hold maura most high, and you really just want her to be found. We do too, even if it means finding out that Maura kept alot more than thought so, to herself. Maybe people really did wonder at UMASS on Monday night. Maybe one of those people was the super....maybe the one who got back her scrubs.....it's too hard to know and I hope you will open your mind up to most every posibility. Maura does not need to be defended. We are more forgiving than that and it's nice for a change to see so much info that might matter, coming to the surface.
I only mean this in the most heartfelt way.
Linda

if citigirl is honestly answering the question about Maura's having only one cell phone with certainty, then i say amen. i'd hope she isn't hedging or covering up for her.
wow, Linda....your statement to the effect that it's time to get real, as renner is, is outstanding. i hope citigirl will recognize your sincerity.

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
If u actually read my post, u would see that I NEVER, NEVER, NEVER said that. I said LE often thinks that way. Read my posts. Slowly. Concentrate. Think. I noticed that u did this post as a way of evading my question ... How do u know Maura did not have a Tracfone? There's no way u could possibly know, if she paid cash. U are becoming tiresome and boring and appear to have an MMM type agenda. U are making me yawn from your predictability.

I did not evade your question. I already answered it.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
if citigirl is honestly answering the question about Maura's having only one cell phone with certainty, then i say amen. i'd hope she isn't hedging or covering up for her.
wow, Linda....your statement to the effect that it's time to get real, as renner is, is outstanding. i hope citigirl will recognize your sincerity.

How could she possibly know? She said she met Maura "once a long time ago". This does not sound to me as if she would be privy to Maura's last minute and spontaneous decisions. The question is why does this matter so much to this one poster? If Maura decided to buy and use a tracfone why would she tell anyone? She's an intelligent and independent adult and does not need permission or approval. She could buy it without anyone ever knowing it if she paid cash.

Sorry for the double post.