Maura Murray

Judged:

1

FrmLE wrote:

Just a suggestion. Anytime you verify a fact or statement by saying "I read it in a newspaper" or "someone posted it it on another forum, blog, etc", the accuracy of that fact or statement is questionable at best.
This is still an active investigation, whatever documents are out there now represent probably less than 10% of the total documents and evidence that exist. Trying to form opinions based on that small a view of the evidence is guesswork at best.

Judged:

3

3

3

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny you should say that! You attacked Suzanne too. When you decided that she had gotten too big for her boots. I'll say this for you, you are consistent. Your pattern is firmly in place and as I said before, very predictable.

Judged:

3

3

3

NHwoodshome wrote:

<quoted text>
Fact is backed up by material such as paperwork and it isn't fact when there's no PROOF! Anyone could tell this guy, hey I work in a bank and here's what I saw. I saw Elvis yesterday so that means HE LIVES!

Judged:

2

2

2

NHwoodshome wrote:

I have a distinct distrust of people when $$$$ is involved. While Renner has done some work, a good author backs up what he says with Affidavits or solid evidence. We get a lot of heresay from Mr. Renner, while it may be true but as the old TV commercial went, " Where's the beef!" I do think Renner has done some homework but I also think its possible he's being baited. Authors have been known to embellish and jump to conclusions.
Sensationalism sells and the mainstream media is living proof of it. I also feel IF the bank account story was true wouldn't LE cold case unit check it out? Doing so would save the state resources on a cold case if they discovered her alive and well.
Just like the original Woodstock, if EVERYONE who claims to have been there was it may have numbered millions! People want to be important and sometimes witness's and people with information inject themselves into these things with fabrications.
When it comes to mysteries like Maura, many seem to believe what they want despite lack of proof. The only real proof we the public have since the accidnt is, she is missing.
When

Judged:

1

1

NHwoodshome wrote:

<quoted text>
I think its a bit arrogant or naive for a police officer to say if we knew who made the call we would know everything. As I stated previously the call could have been anyone including a company. Rite aid calls me all the time when a script is ready or for a survey. If Todd Landrey actually said that then I have little confidence in his investigative experience and skill.

Judged:

2

2

2

Pointless Endeavor wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a strange statement made by Landry, but I wouldn't base my opinion of his investigative skills solely on that example. He was instrumental in identifying the perpetrators of the Zantop murders in 2001, If I recall, by tracking the purchase of the murder weapons through the internet.

Judged:

2

1

1

Pointless Endeavor wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a strange statement made by Landry, but I wouldn't base my opinion of his investigative skills solely on that example. He was instrumental in identifying the perpetrators of the Zantop murders in 2001, If I recall, by tracking the purchase of the murder weapons through the internet.

Judged:

2

2

2

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>

Suzanne had the take no prisoners signature style, she was respected for her intelligence and insight.

Judged:

5

3

2

Pointless Endeavor wrote:

<quoted text>
Landry ... was instrumental in identifying the perpetrators of the Zantop murders in 2001, If I recall, by tracking the purchase of the murder weapons through the internet.

Judged:

4

4

4

Pointless Endeavor wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, well said. Speaking of documents, has anyone seen and uploaded a copy of the actual affidavit, not just a cut-n-paste block of text that's been sourced to Chris King's blog? I recall a topix user "Whitewash" claims to have seen a copy just floating around the County office that was allegedly seen by chance, but there's still no proof of it's existence that I've seen. Maybe CK or someone else could upload a copy or cite a document control number that could be used to obtain another copy from the state? It would be very helpful for all to have a real document as the basis of discussion.

Judged:

1

Lauren wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you!

Judged:

4

3

3

Snowy wrote:

i trust a book is well under way. writers write to earn a living and to advance their literary reputations.
i suspect renner didn't just appear out of the blue; i wouldn't be surprised to learn he is collaborating with a source who has been following, investigating, and has been fully engaged in the "community" of blogs and forums since day one.
the only surprise is the timing; there is no conclusion, as yet, to the story of M's disappearance. abduction, murder or suicide are unproven.
it is no wonder the "family" is resisting, and a surge of comments and statements are appearing here and on renner's blog. the FireKitty, second in line behind Helena, worked very hard to block access to info about M's past. there was palpable hatred toward her, and personal attacks directed at her in this contest. after all, access to that coveted info would substantially enhance the book's content.
i'm satisfied that the elephant in the room has been identified; time to relax and watch this develop.

Judged:

1

NHwoodshome wrote:

I have a distinct distrust of people when $$$$ is involved. While Renner has done some work, a good author backs up what he says with Affidavits or solid evidence. We get a lot of heresay from Mr. Renner, while it may be true but as the old TV commercial went, " Where's the beef!" I do think Renner has done some homework but I also think its possible he's being baited. Authors have been known to embellish and jump to conclusions.
Sensationalism sells and the mainstream media is living proof of it. I also feel IF the bank account story was true wouldn't LE cold case unit check it out? Doing so would save the state resources on a cold case if they discovered her alive and well.
Just like the original Woodstock, if EVERYONE who claims to have been there was it may have numbered millions! People want to be important and sometimes witness's and people with information inject themselves into these things with fabrications.
When it comes to mysteries like Maura, many seem to believe what they want despite lack of proof. The only real proof we the public have since the accidnt is, she is missing.
When

Judged:

3

2

1

kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
So what you're saying is, you didn't look at what I was talking about before you said I was wrong.:/ Sigh.
Bedtime for bonzo.

Judged:

2

2

1

sophia the original wrote:

I've said this before, and I think it's worth repeating. Someone knows one piece of what happened, and maybe one person knows exactly what happened. Perhaps friends, acquaintances in MA know one piece - or more - of something and for whatever reason have not shared it. I believe that someone in Swiftwater or the surrounding area knows more than we've heard, again, for whatever reason. Perhaps both sets of information are significant, from NH, from MA. Perhaps only one is ultimately significant. There is a reason for those who know more to keep silent. It may be relatively innocent, or it may not be. I wonder if we can ever know more here.

Judged:

1

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>you did not state that it was on the website until after I replied to your posting. And thats when I looked it up on the website. I did have a copy of the police report {dispatch calls} in front of me when I replied to you . This is the report I thought you were referring to.