Maura Murray

aftermath wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's be clear. It is YOUR point of view, evidentally, that a state trooper is being "blamed." If this is YOUR interpretation, so be it. Be realistic, be truthful, however. From the very beginning there has been lack of information surrounding a trooper's appearance at the accident site. Why? Surely in almost 7 years, someone, armchair sleuth or otherwise, would have had occasion to interview him. You might want to ask your old friends Bill or Snowy and I'm sure they will accommodate your need to know about the history of inquiries over a period of almost 7 years regarding this specific subject. Good luck.

I like your style aftermath. Well said

WTH-the-original wrote:

It never ceases to amaze me when these new people pop in for a week or so. They have all the answers. They go over all the same ridiculous scenarios that have been rehashed for years but they come and think that no one else has thought of that in all these years. They never seem to realize that these are not the first time we have heard these.
Nor, to they even spend the smallest amount of time to research any of the information that exists in the years that have passed. The reason is simple. They are smarter than all the others who have preceded them.
I don't blame them. I blame the TV shows they watched to learn how to do this.
Bill

Turtle soup is warming up. Tell us whats new WTF mr know it all

While we're pondering SP activity here...Theres a similar situation with the Brianna Maitland case,an officer comes across the scene of her strange accident&as I believe "goes off shift" and doesnt bother mentioning it to anyone...Were both girls run off the road?Did both accept a ride from a "safe" officer....This has always been a possible explanation/reason for a coverup in my eyes.

WTH the original Bully

WTH-the-original wrote:

It never ceases to amaze me when these new people pop in for a week or so. They have all the answers. They go over all the same ridiculous scenarios that have been rehashed for years but they come and think that no one else has thought of that in all these years. They never seem to realize that these are not the first time we have heard these.
Nor, to they even spend the smallest amount of time to research any of the information that exists in the years that have passed. The reason is simple. They are smarter than all the others who have preceded them.
I don't blame them. I blame the TV shows they watched to learn how to do this.
Bill

It never ceases to amaze me why you just don't go on a private site
so you don't have to subject yourself to people like us.

aftermath wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's be clear. It is YOUR point of view, evidentally, that a state trooper is being "blamed." If this is YOUR interpretation, so be it. Be realistic, be truthful, however. From the very beginning there has been lack of information surrounding a trooper's appearance at the accident site. Why? Surely in almost 7 years, someone, armchair sleuth or otherwise, would have had occasion to interview him. You might want to ask your old friends Bill or Snowy and I'm sure they will accommodate your need to know about the history of inquiries over a period of almost 7 years regarding this specific subject. Good luck.

How much clearer can I be? In my first paragraf I said "I think" and "I've observed". I'm new here and I don't know Bill or Snowy but maybe I should get to know them. On the other hand IMO I think you are a bully and a very nasty person and not someone I would like to know. I think I know now if I want to be a duck or a turtle. Thanks for helping me decide.

Straight up...WTH....Exactly what are your investigative credentials?
What the "regulars" dont realize is A)some of us have been here for years in a read only capacity. B)Why comment when we get squashed by the "big shots"who are certainly more capable than I of rehashing instead of talking the off limits NHSP.

Lockerup...this is the norm here...Every time I dare throw out a possibility i get squashed down.Maybe its when someone suggests an off limits topic?i believe there are people with agendas here.I also believe theres a suspect that posts on a few topics forums,anyone else picked up on that?

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
It never ceases to amaze me why you just don't go on a private site
so you don't have to subject yourself to people like us.

People like you? What kind of people would that be?
Ones that bully and call names?

Fellow ducks,

For your information there was a contributor on this board who earlier this year was waging something of a campaign against NH state trooper J K-M, the officer who was seemingly operating in radio silence for some two hours after Maura´s accident.
This poster might have been going a bit too far in some respects, but she was more or less hounded out of this forum for daring to bring the subject up for discussion.
J K-M might for all we know be an admirable officer in every respect, but his actions must surely be deemed of interest for an open discussion on this forum, and this for rather obvious reasons.
It also appears that state trooper K-M for some reason was relegated to a position at the Motor Vehicle Registry of NH for some time after Maura´s vanishing, although he now seems to be back as a fully-fledged state trooper.

All you CSI graduates. All you need to come here and participate is very simple. Read what has already been investigated so you have a least a clue what has already been done, what is known. And, use common sense and a little logic.

Bully, no. Tired of hearing the same CSI/Perry Mason bullshit. Yep. Have heard too much of it to remain polite.

Bill

I dont think JWB is being a bully.I think he's maybe sick of being berated.Its toxic here.Thats why Im a read only participant.But the NHSP discussion today was worth commenting on.

But WTH your talking down to us again.I truly appreciate your insight,at times,but please dont suggest I WATCH Tv...Some of us have read everything posted everywhere,for hours nightly&actually are in indirect contact with T.O..forgive my insistance here WTH, what again are your investigative credentials?

Bumping for Maura-what post number range was this discussed in?Id like to reread.

Go to bed WTH or snuggle up to a good perry mason book and say to yourself " I am the man Everyone and I know it all."

in Memory of WTH

The turtles

I have found this posting written almost identically
on several sites. here is a copy of one of them.
Close your Eyes WTH and don't read it.

The family reports that they were told there was no radio communication between the officer and his station for approximately two hours upon arrival to the scene.[9][11] There was no immediate search as it was assumed that Maura had left the scene by herself.[3] Her bank card, credit cards, and cellphone have not been used since.[6]

I am referring to the people that are clearly off base, not ones that have taken the time to check the years worth of background that is out there. I have no real credentials. Common sense and logic and the work I have done as an EMT which is very pertinent in this case. Having seen many drunk driving accidents, and the aftermath, how the people react. The drivers in particular.

Bill

Has anyone researched his reputation locally?Lets just say there have been rumors of rogue cops in that region..Ive read some scary stuff.All speculation of course.

WTH-the-original wrote:

I am referring to the people that are clearly off base, not ones that have taken the time to check the years worth of background that is out there. I have no real credentials. Common sense and logic and the work I have done as an EMT which is very pertinent in this case. Having seen many drunk driving accidents, and the aftermath, how the people react. The drivers in particular.
Bill

WTH Maybe a better approach would be to relax because we are not all perfect. It is ok to be wrong. If you feel the need to correct someone and can't hold back then you might be better served by doing it in a nice and respectful way as you would like to be treated.

jwb the real original one wrote:

I have found this posting written almost identically
on several sites. here is a copy of one of them.
Close your Eyes WTH and don't read it.
The family reports that they were told there was no radio communication between the officer and his station for approximately two hours upon arrival to the scene.[9][11] There was no immediate search as it was assumed that Maura had left the scene by herself.[3] Her bank card, credit cards, and cellphone have not been used since.[6]

Can Citigirl confirm or deny this? She is family right That might be a start to see if it is fact or fiction.