Maura Murray

ok.. I see the call to the salamonies - 1255pm - 3 Minutes.. which really isn't accurate..... the call could have been 2 minutes and 1 sec and it would still show 3 min. There is ALWAYS a one miniute minimum....... a 3 min call is 99.9999999999 a call that is actually about a 15 sec talk time. The wireless phone starts to bill as soon as the phone rings... so time is actually billed when you waiting for them to answer..then the charge stops rounded up to the last full min. my prof opinion - it was a 30 sec call. most likely do you have vacancy. the caller didn't remember the call because she prob didn't even identify herself

Wowzer wrote:

<quoted text>
Why are you asking me? You've stated for years on here that you are a local but yet you didn't know there was a house right next to the store. A local would know these things as the house has been there forever.

i will excuse your sarcasm, the home on site is part of the store, correct???

i wonder if they ever generated a report from the calling cardk.......... that can be done. Its an ad hoc report and you pull it by the PIN number -and the card number. That would show each call and the amount of airtime that was taken or by amount - how much card value reduced......

NOW that would be interesting. Helena won't email me anymore after the Mason theory.. so I can't ask. but I am curious.. very curious..

i told them they can trace the call to billys phone - the call would gone thru the PSTN ( pots) copper/landline system as well as the MSC/Switch on the wireless side. two networks - cant get better odds. NOW> who else did she call was the card ever used again... I never get an answer...

Thats when I got booted from Maura Murray's facebook.. I got de-friended - the boot the ax.. see ya.. later gater..

you know i really don't think I have been that confrontational.. I have never fully let loose on her .. ever. I think I might now. I have always tried to still have compassion for the family and I just adore her friend Jenni Brooks and her music.

I am saddened....... investigets discovery does a whole show on Maura.. since then there is less awareness not more.......... why was the first site censored when the timing was so critical.

Dawn - I can´t imagine why these procedures you´re describing haven´t been done years ago. Or have they but was never made public?

Dawn wrote:

ok.. I see the call to the salamonies - 1255pm - 3 Minutes.. which really isn't accurate..... the call could have been 2 minutes and 1 sec and it would still show 3 min. There is ALWAYS a one miniute minimum....... a 3 min call is 99.9999999999 a call that is actually about a 15 sec talk time. The wireless phone starts to bill as soon as the phone rings... so time is actually billed when you waiting for them to answer..then the charge stops rounded up to the last full min. my prof opinion - it was a 30 sec call. most likely do you have vacancy. the caller didn't remember the call because she prob didn't even identify herself

should read - 15 to 30 seconds actual talk time - call 61 seconds.. bill reads 3 minutes.. you pay for three but only talked 15 sec. hope that makes sense.

hannah_b wrote:

Dawn - I can´t imagine why these procedures you´re describing haven´t been done years ago. Or have they but was never made public?

Hannah
They told me that the phone company told them they cant track prepaid calling cards.

How does the phone company make money..... revenue is generated by calls. How do you make people buy more calling cards - each time they call you deduct minutes - how by their unique combination of card and pin and the NUMBER they are calling to... now you have to go to the next level to get the call from number - its all tracked through the PSTN and MSC/Switch.

what happened. simple. They got a front line employee who DIDN"T escalate and told him it cant be done. I think it is NO fault of their own. This happens all the time just becuase the person who answered the phone doesn't know how.. doesn't mean it cant be done. things lik this happen to customers of mine.. unfortunatly all the time.. then they get me and say I know we cant get this level of info and i tell them... since I deal with businesses its easier the info is on site in their equipment.. but with consumer/residential... we can track everytyhing on the phone and the internet..

Columbo
You ready to have me help you on the phone bill yet.?

I am here and will do all I can. I have direct connect to the CIO at Verizon too. All we need is a request from Sharon Rausch since it was in her name. Thats all we need.

Its all legal with Sharons consent... Its Verizon for landline over there. I worked for them for 11 years. I have contacts.

Dawn wrote:

Fred Murray's own words
It so dark you can't see your hand before your face..

Right, and yet she may have been seen dashing along somewhere 4-5 miles East of the accident scene. At first there'd be the flashers from her "stranded" car, then light from surrounding homes, other cars....I did the mapquest once, for someone walking from and to the spot seen dashing and the time actually fit pretty well for someone having trouble running and or walking in such darkness.
But, eyes adjust to darkness after awhile, and there was something of a moon reflecting on snow. You'd know where the road was by the contrast. JMO

WOW DAWN!!!!!! I have been hoping for this kind of info. You've responded before but this time is great!!!!!

And hey, don't feel bad. I looked up one day to find I was no longer a facebook friend myself. Then again, I never do much checking on facebook and then there's the idea that privacy was soon to be no more. That friends of friends could see what you really think. Maybe they trimmed the 50 some people due to that, and understanably so. If you're telling so and so something, you sure wouldn't want someone else reading the same thing. And just being "friende" is enough to make that possible.

Dawn wrote:

I am here and will do all I can. I have direct connect to the CIO at Verizon too. All we need is a request from Sharon Rausch since it was in her name. Thats all we need.
Its all legal with Sharons consent... Its Verizon for landline over there. I worked for them for 11 years. I have contacts.

If they don´t take your offer I will forever believe someone (or more than one) has something to hide. This should be done ASAP! I can´t believe Sharon R wouldn´t want this done if she got to know about it.

If Sharon reads this - you can contact me as well - I have always told Helena Fred can - Helena knows how to reach me

Also for any other missing persons case Kelly Jackowski knows how to reach me as well. I will always help a missing persons family. Its the least I could do..

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
If they don´t take your offer I will forever believe someone (or more than one) has something to hide. This should be done ASAP! I can´t believe Sharon R wouldn´t want this done if she got to know about it.

I have been offering since I first got here. Remember I even offered for my late friend Nathan S. my sales engineer to speak to them as well. Nate died last year - freak heart condition only 42. My sales engineer is David now and what great. Guess where he grew up New Hampshire.

The offer still stands today and always will.

I have said it all.. all about what is needed to get the ball rolling etc. It is actually a perfect scenario and one that probably most missing people don't have - the phone wasn't in her name. So there is NOT a violation of privacy. Legally it Sharon's privacy not Maura's. She was just a user of the phone. The contrat bound Sharon to the agreement not Maura. Can you imagine if you couldn't do something becuase. your familly member is missing and not here to say.. yes look at my account. - well we don't want the account. We want the billing records. very different than a bill or an account. we want specifics. handoffs while calling we could even estimate by handoff how fast she was going.

I doubt I will hear anything.. Off of this forum through email I have been offering this for well 2 years now. Nathan was here for the first year wanting to help.... when something you take for granted that you do everyday can impact someones life or tell them more info about their loved one.. you want to help its natural.

Since I hijacked the forum

So read and weap JMLH after calling me names every chance you got. Thats why great people like Kelly from Project Jason and I keep in contadct.. I have good ideas and wealth of info on concrete evidence that helps the missing. I am still working on something wiht my father and project jason but I had to put it off due to my hip replacement. Not saying anything about Sophie BEan.... She got all ruffled up but I really like her. She stood her ground when Beagles personal life was thown up all over here.

I sleep at night. I sleep well. I didn't NEED to put out here the good I was offering or doing. I am a peaceful person.

Dawn wrote:

I doubt I will hear anything.. Off of this forum through email I have been offering this for well 2 years now. Nathan was here for the first year wanting to help.... when something you take for granted that you do everyday can impact someones life or tell them more info about their loved one.. you want to help its natural.

I fail to understand why they didn´t go for it. Obviously it´s Sharons call, not Helena´s or Fred´s. Maybe she believes it would upset Billy too much. Only reason I can think of. Are you sure she personally got to know about this possibility, not just the Murray´s?

Dawn wrote:

I have said it all.. all about what is needed to get the ball rolling etc. It is actually a perfect scenario and one that probably most missing people don't have - the phone wasn't in her name. So there is NOT a violation of privacy. Legally it Sharon's privacy not Maura's. She was just a user of the phone. The contrat bound Sharon to the agreement not Maura. Can you imagine if you couldn't do something becuase. your familly member is missing and not here to say.. yes look at my account.- well we don't want the account. We want the billing records. very different than a bill or an account. we want specifics. handoffs while calling we could even estimate by handoff how fast she was going.

Just a crazy idea maybe but that calling card number and pin, if ever used on the cell might be there to bring back if I understand this correctly.
Only because I've done it myself to keep someone from my real number.....I wonder if Maura ever did. What do you think? In a pinch to call someone, but finding no other way to call, maybe just maybe she did this?