Maura Murray

Snowy wrote:

Mason, last i knew, stood by his theory, and by online questioning, once stated he was willing to apologize and/or withdraw his speculation if resolution eventually proves to be different than his analysis.

Mason:

Re: Whats in progress?
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2009, 04:56:51 PM »
I predict Mr. Murray will be indicted, regardless of whether the blood was planted, within one year from today.

Snowy, still standing by this prediction???????

gotta go for now.

whitenoise wrote:

<quoted text>
The last person she spent any amount of time with was Fred in his motel room. 3AM Sat- sometime Sun afternoon. What is Fred's alibi? LE was unable to reach him via cellphone.

You can't honestly think LE had Fred's cellphone number.....for crying out loud!!!!

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
She was last reliably seen by the Hadley MA officer who responded to the Corolla crash.

thank you for that addition/correction.

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe I'm just the only one who is speculating on what LE has, but we have to assume that they have more info than we do. I have posted numerous times that MM father who has constantly fought with LE during the whole case, didn't sit down and do a formal interview until 2 years after the case and he brought lawyers. I don't know why he would delay that so long if any info he has can help find her.......I also think MM father knows more about why she went went missing.
LE - probably has: pictures of MM at the ATM and liquor store. MAybe security footage of the gas station. DNA evidence of the rag found in the exhaust. PErhaps a full search and lab make up of Maura's fathers rental car. Maybe a reservation is his name in the area where Maura went missing.

i agree. undoubtedly, all pertinent evidence is in the hands of LE, as it should be.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
IDK, did anyone ever ask Mason what the impetus was for his steadfast interest in Maura's case?
Seems like he was deep into the Ponzi scheme and Student Loan Express at the time, and other things.....

There was actually a Ponzi scheme type business operation somewhat connected to this case, even if very peripherally. Don´t think Mason ever mentioned that angle, but there was.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Mason:
Re: Whats in progress?
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2009, 04:56:51 PM »
I predict Mr. Murray will be indicted, regardless of whether the blood was planted, within one year from today.
Snowy, still standing by this prediction???????

He should be indicted just on the fact that he didn't sit with LE for interview for two years, and he did everything in his power to fight them about the case.

@ post #9608

we are not sufficiently on speaking terms by lost opportunities to connect about this or other subjects. by your actions toward others, and as a witness to your online interactions with WhiteWash and Wowzer, contact with you inevitably proves to be unpleasant and unfortunate.

by infrequently and seldom answering each other directly, it should be abundantly clear that your questions are unwelcome.

while i enjoy commenting and sharing my opinions and ideas, i am not hopelessly enmeshed in the disappearance of MM as you seem to be, nor is my view as narrow or fiercely biased as yours.

do your best to carry on. i suggest the most practical course of action is to await news, someday, of an authentic clue or evidence to bring resolution to the mystery.

SnowyB

Beagle wrote:

If you want to stick to the facts, then stick to the hard, cold, actual facts. Apply the same standards to yourself as to others. It is a seductive assumption that Maura was at the WB curve.
There are very few things positively known by the public which immediately surround Maura's disappearance, but there are definitely some things that have happened even years later - offline, out of public view - that indicate she may not have left Amherst voluntarily to perish in the NH woods.

well, a challenge is issued, then, to whomever wishes to establish a timeline of indisputable facts.
while Advocate once graciously answered that call, there is much disagreement about which entries are/were reliably accurate by the sources made available to the public, and in consideration of information fed to the public by MM's self-identified "family".
JRenner has a challenge ahead, if he chooses to adhere to excellent investigating, and if he pays meticulous attention to accuracy in reporting.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't honestly think LE had Fred's cellphone number.....for crying out loud!!!!

mcsmom I would think that an investigation would have freds cell phone number. He traveled for work and why would they not want to have his cell number? To contact Fred if they found Maura at best.

Snowy wrote:

@ post #9608
we are not sufficiently on speaking terms by lost opportunities to connect about this or other subjects. by your actions toward others, and as a witness to your online interactions with WhiteWash and Wowzer, contact with you inevitably proves to be unpleasant and unfortunate.
by infrequently and seldom answering each other directly, it should be abundantly clear that your questions are unwelcome.
while i enjoy commenting and sharing my opinions and ideas, i am not hopelessly enmeshed in the disappearance of MM as you seem to be, nor is my view as narrow or fiercely biased as yours.
do your best to carry on. i suggest the most practical course of action is to await news, someday, of an authentic clue or evidence to bring resolution to the mystery.
SnowyB

Mason:

Re: Whats in progress?
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2009, 04:56:51 PM »
I predict Mr. Murray will be indicted, regardless of whether the blood was planted, within one year from today.

Snowy, still standing by this prediction???????

whitenoise wrote:

<quoted text>
Most of the violence occurs between family, friends or acquiantances. Most victims know their attacker, and the attacker has a reason for doing it.
Who is known for his violent temper? FM not SBD.

serial killers do not know their victams and who is to say that is not what happened?

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
she ran away. fact.
she did so without keeping in touch with family and friends to share her destination or the reason for her travel. period.
i envy no one.

she ran away is not a fact. please explain you seem to know more than
the nhsp who don't know.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't honestly think LE had Fred's cellphone number.....for crying out loud!!!!

They successfully contacted Kathleen. She would have been able to give tham his cellphone number. Don´t know if she did, and if she didn´t, why not.

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
There was actually a Ponzi scheme type business operation somewhat connected to this case, even if very peripherally. Don´t think Mason ever mentioned that angle, but there was.

There was, really. The condo owner (wife) was part of such an operation.

Jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
she ran away is not a fact. please explain you seem to know more than
the nhsp who don't know.

Going secretly away on a trip without telling family or friends and lying about the reasons for ones absence is the very definition of running away, permanently or temporarily.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't honestly think LE had Fred's cellphone number.....for crying out loud!!!!

Fred Jr. gave it to LE.

Jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
mcsmom I would think that an investigation would have freds cell phone number. He traveled for work and why would they not want to have his cell number? To contact Fred if they found Maura at best.

Oh yes, I presume they would have contact numbers for Fred. Most assuredly. But not right away, not in the first 24/48 hours.

I am only pointing out that LE would not have had any knowledge of a cell phone number for FM at this point in time.

whitenoise wrote:

<quoted text>
The last person she spent any amount of time with was Fred in his motel room. 3AM Sat- sometime Sun afternoon. What is Fred's alibi? LE was unable to reach him via cellphone.

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2011/0...
Kostanski could have hit and killed a cop as easily as he hit and killed the 18 year old.

you didn't answer my question but thanks anyway beagle.

what happened to the 40 something year old in the suv we were talking about beagle? now 18 year old something?