Maura Murray

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
the 7.8 miles is past 116 easton. we had it up not to long ago on this forum. There was a silver truck showing at the spot when the Google pic was taken.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
And this was shown on this forum? I must have missed it. Can you pull it up again or provide a link please?

mcsmom wrote:

Matthew wrote:
I was hunting 7.8 miles from the site of the car crash of Maura and found cloths with duct tape with hair in the tape. I called the state police they said they would call me back. Then 4 days they called me and wanted me to show them where the cloths were since the first call to the police it snowed but we found them and never heard nothing else.Matthew, please contact me at Admin(@) MauraMurrayMissing.com

Frostman wrote:

I was the one who was curious about where "Matthew" might have been. So I Google-mapped 7.8 miles from WB and came across the dirt parking lot. JWB then commented he knew of the spot and had seen hunters parked along there. We then "talked" about the topographical maps available on-line from NHFG. The point was to ascertain where this place might be, if it's true at all. It is 1.7 miles east on 112 past where 116 intersects 112 on the way down from Franconia. Look for a large field on the north side. And on the Google map pix there's a silver/green truck there at that time.
FrmLE stated this morning that he was privy to the results from the DNA obtained from the cloths/duct tape and ensnarled hair and it's not MM's DNA -- FWIW.

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

Wowzer I thought you were asking FrmLE questions regarding my original questions to him, sorry didn't think you were asking me.
I was just asking him the results of the forensics done on the hair and tape.

mcsmom wrote:

Most recent of all the conducted forensics publicly known thus far.

mcsmom wrote:

Most recent of all the conducted forensics publicly known thus far.

Frostman wrote:

I was the one who was curious about where "Matthew" might have been. So I Google-mapped 7.8 miles from WB and came across the dirt parking lot. JWB then commented he knew of the spot and had seen hunters parked along there. We then "talked" about the topographical maps available on-line from NHFG. The point was to ascertain where this place might be, if it's true at all. It is 1.7 miles east on 112 past where 116 intersects 112 on the way down from Franconia. Look for a large field on the north side. And on the Google map pix there's a silver/green truck there at that time.
FrmLE stated this morning that he was privy to the results from the DNA obtained from the cloths/duct tape and ensnarled hair and it's not MM's DNA -- FWIW.

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

Most recent of all the conducted forensics publicly known thus far.

Judged:

2

2

1

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
What do you mean the litany of offenses? Most of I write is based on the facts that came from Renner's blog. Maybe I don't use politically correct words when describing her actions. However in the english language - one who steals is a Thief. You don't have to agree with what I write, but you should be careful about how much you stick your neck out for this girl. You never know what is going to come out next about her in Renner's blog.
You just wrote that you don't think that Maura addiction/issues were the catalyst to why she stole. Then why did she do it? You think she was doing a UMASS research paper on pizza and ran out of funds and couldn't find donators to pay for her research? If you don't think she had a motive to steal that makes her a theif by opportunity.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Baseless? Groundless. I have posted many times before, most of what I took off Renner's blog that Maura was on her way to possible meet her father. You can go back and review my posts about the possibility that she was meeting her father. But you can't say baseless, or groundless.
You also have to keep in mind that most murder victims know their killer and have a relationship to them in some way or another. There would be much more grounds of her disappearing that way, than her waiting by the car for five minutes and someone snatched her.
So you can't throw out the words baseless and groundless, unless of course you don't want to look into plausable theories.

Judged:

1

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
It hasn't been validated that hair and duct tape were found unless you know more?

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
It, to my knowledge, hadn't been validated that hair and duct tape weren't found.
I asked.
He answered.
Nothing more.
Nothing less.

Judged:

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
You're just beating around the bush as usual.
IMHO there was no hunter and no hair or tape. It was bogus.
Do you have proof that says otherwise?