Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't care if someone agrees with me or not. What I can't abide is stupidity. Especially when it is attempted to be passed off as some noble effort. When the person offering hasn't a clue. Took no effort to figure anything out and proceeds with written or verbal diarrhea.
Bill

Judged:

3

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Why?
If it isn't him I'd be laughing my ass off watching them chase their tails while I am preparing my lawsuit. And if it is him, he is under no obligation to talk to anyone. What he did isn't illegal, immoral or even fattening. It is not illegal to post something that has a bunch of busy bodies start chest beating and running around in circles. It actually kind of shows what they are made of. Not too pretty.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Why?
If it isn't him I'd be laughing my ass off watching them chase their tails while I am preparing my lawsuit. And if it is him, he is under no obligation to talk to anyone. What he did isn't illegal, immoral or even fattening. It is not illegal to post something that has a bunch of busy bodies start chest beating and running around in circles. It actually kind of shows what they are made of. Not too pretty.
Bill

Judged:

4

3

2

ross wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would he be preparing a lawsuit? Nothing illegal has been done. By either parties.

Judged:

2

1

1

Laurieisgone wrote:

Yes, thanks for the hug a tree website, I found it the other day. I didn't go back a few days worth of posts to find that link simply because I was busy with life in general. But yes, thanks found it eventually.
I don't do the judging on posts if you were referring to me, I think it's a silly part of the forum and don't participate in that.

Judged:

2

1

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
your right Bill and everyone else is wrong. Thanks for setting us straight again. I guess the granola didn't work.

Judged:

3

2

1

ross wrote:

Im not convinced the two people are the same. Ear shape is not a finger print.

Judged:

3

3

1

Laurieisgone wrote:

Yes, thanks for the hug a tree website, I found it the other day. I didn't go back a few days worth of posts to find that link simply because I was busy with life in general. But yes, thanks found it eventually.
I don't do the judging on posts if you were referring to me, I think it's a silly part of the forum and don't participate in that.

Judged:

1

1

1

ross wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would he be preparing a lawsuit? Nothing illegal has been done. By either parties.

Judged:

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Let me ask you. If someone decides to take the law into their own hands like oh, maybe Fred. Lets say he goes and beats up Beagle convinced he did the video. Does Renner have any legal exposure? What if it wasn't even Beagle? What do you think? Even if those waters are murky legally, imagine all the trials he might be invited to attend, not including any possible criminal proceedings. A lot of computer crime statutes and civil responsibility is still evolving. Might be a hell of a case, maybe precedent setting or statute creating. Imagine all the years he might be involved.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>What I do know is that more people are back on the forums posting again.

Judged:

4

3

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Your welcome.
Bill

Judged:

2

1

1

ross wrote:

<quoted text>
Point taken. Though, Beagle has done himself no favors by posting his picture of himself on a forum about this case, and insisting that he has been questioned by police about his involvement.

Judged:

2

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, but quality is definitely lacking. Numbers alone don't help. Always look at the quality.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

2

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Quality of posters is a plus. But numbers in book sales is what he wants.

Judged:

1

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
He was being truthful. That's like telling a rape victim you didn't do yourself any favors wearing a skirt