Maura Murray

ross wrote:

<quoted text>
"Meant to reply to this post"
Are you serious? Do I even have to explain how the two situations are not even remotely alike?
Beagle is not a rape victim. I am sorry, but that was a moronic thing to say.

My fault for using a metaphor. If someone was shot in a driveby to you say "you didn't do yourself any favors by standing there.".

jj5323j wrote:

where on topix did beagle post his picture? anyone got a link?

It was someone (AO) who had his picture posted on a certain blog site, but it seems to have gone poof since this morning. A practical joke that backfired?

ross wrote:

<quoted text>
Point taken. Though, Beagle has done himself no favors by posting his picture of himself on a forum about this case, and insisting that he has been questioned by police about his involvement.

I don't know where Renner got the picture. I had never seen a picture of Beagle. Never needed to. Mental issues abound on the internet. That is not a reason that someone should become a target of physical abuse. Beagle had as much anonymity as he needed. Renner changed all that without any evidence that it is him and in the process might have put him in danger.

Bill

jj5323j wrote:

where on topix did beagle post his picture? anyone got a link?

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/franconia-nh/...
Not on topix's on blogspot .

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
My fault for using a metaphor. If someone was shot in a driveby to you say "you didn't do yourself any favors by standing there.".

Beagle came to and posted to this forums because of his interest in the MM case. He posted his picture on his own. None of that was happenstance. Your scenario is happenstance.

ross wrote:

<quoted text>
Beagle came to and posted to this forums because of his interest in the MM case. He posted his picture on his own. None of that was happenstance. Your scenario is happenstance.

Beagle might have posted his pic you don't even know if it is him nor do I. Also he just so happens to resemble a man on a you tube video. That to me is happenstance move on now.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know where Renner got the picture. I had never seen a picture of Beagle. Never needed to. Mental issues abound on the internet. That is not a reason that someone should become a target of physical abuse. Beagle had as much anonymity as he needed. Renner changed all that without any evidence that it is him and in the process might have put him in danger.
Bill

I agree that Renner probably should not have done what he did. That very well could put him in danger, as you pointed out to me. Though, if you say he had as much anonymity as he needed, then he still has as much anonymity as he needs.

Fact is that Beagle has said that he was question by the police about his involvement in the disappearance of MM, and he posted his on a website that pertains to the same.

What I am saying is that Beagle is not blame free in this circus. "Play with fire, and get burned"

WTF, I too am not sure where his picture was posted and if, in fact, he himself posted it. If it comes to be that Beagle himself did not post his picture, then what I am saying is of base. I stated in my last post that it was fact the he posted his own picture. That is not fact.

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Beagle might have posted his pic you don't even know if it is him nor do I. Also he just so happens to resemble a man on a you tube video. That to me is happenstance move on now.

As I said before, I am not convinced it is the same person on both of the pictures either.

This is the link for the blog with Beagle's picture. It has since been taken down from Renner's site, no idea why.

http://www.blogger.com/profile/05401837611129...

I meant to say his alleged picture, since really we really have not met the guy, no clue whether or not this is even his blog, it was a link someone on Renner's comments posted saying it was Beagle. The blogger is from Amherst.

Laurieisgone wrote:

This is the link for the blog with Beagle's picture. It has since been taken down from Renner's site, no idea why.
http://www.blogger.com/profile/05401837611129...

We can assume someone with the an esq at the end of their named called him. Or maybe and I hope he was reading some of his followers and this topic and decided that he was losing favor

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
We can assume someone with the an esq at the end of their named called him. Or maybe and I hope he was reading some of his followers and this topic and decided that he was losing favor

Beagles pic is still up

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
It was someone (AO) who had his picture posted on a certain blog site, but it seems to have gone poof since this morning. A practical joke that backfired?

The pic was sent by a poster to Renners Blog. It had his Beagles real name on it so I assume renner took it off because of that.

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
The pic was sent by a poster to Renners Blog. It had his Beagles real name on it so I assume renner took it off because of that.

Does it bother you or anyone that renners last couple of posts is about bloggers? I'd like to read feedback

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
The pic was sent by a poster to Renners Blog. It had his Beagles real name on it so I assume renner took it off because of that.

I mean he took the post off that had the original link to Beagles Pic. The poster gave Beagles Real name in her posting. Renner then took the Pic of Beagle posted it and deleted the original post with his name.

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
I mean he took the post off that had the original link to Beagles Pic. The poster gave Beagles Real name in her posting. Renner then took the Pic of Beagle posted it and deleted the original post with his name.

I think it was wrong to do this to someone who has suffered enough. I think people egg him on and maybe like RF, the joke is on us, the things they say because of being hounded for so long. JMPO

just me wrote:

<quoted text>
I think it was wrong to do this to someone who has suffered enough. I think people egg him on and maybe like RF, the joke is on us, the things they say because of being hounded for so long. JMPO

If it was him that posted the videos then all I can say is that he put himself in the position. If it wasn't him on the video then it was jumping the gun and wrong.

Are you saying you condone the videos?

just me wrote:

<quoted text>
I think it was wrong to do this to someone who has suffered enough. I think people egg him on and maybe like RF, the joke is on us, the things they say because of being hounded for so long. JMPO

suffered from what?

just me wrote:

<quoted text>
I think it was wrong to do this to someone who has suffered enough. I think people egg him on and maybe like RF, the joke is on us, the things they say because of being hounded for so long. JMPO

I'm a little unclear as to who the sufferer is here. Are you saying that the YouTube contributor "112dirtbag" posted a video (deliberately laughing wickedly on and obviously in reference to the anniversary of a missing girl) as a reaction to being bullied by others?

If that's the case, help me understand how one justifies the other.