Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not going to waste my time with links. I also prefer you look for the information yourself. It wasn't even that long ago that this had been mentioned.
Here goes for the eleventh time. Consider she was stressed. Consider she wasn't suicidal but was very, very agitated. Her reason to lie about getting away. She was desperate for time to decompress whatever her problems. Then she crashes a second car. What kind of monkey wrench was that in the plans? I mean hows that for kick to the nutsack and being lit on fire? Could that have tipped her over the edge?
So the gas was needed for the plan. But her plans turned to crap with that crash and the alcohol on board. She may have been blinded by what she saw as a total lack of options.
Up in NH, where she wasn't supposed to be. Having now to explain what she was doing in her crashed car in NH and her lie about the death in the family. Not only to family, but employers and co-workers and proffesors. Not to mention all the baggage she was already carrying. The crying jag, the previous car accident, the possible credit card scam, the workload, the long distance boyfriend thing. Her plate was pretty full.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

amy researches wrote:

Some such docs were posted to Advocate's old board, but they're no longer there. Did anyone save them?

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
ummm....how would you know? thought you were a newbie?

Judged:

2

1

1

Keepthesearchalive wrote:

<quoted text>
And all of that generally leads to a walk away, for sure.
But i think... it also left this girl vulnerable in an area not outside of the area of known "serial" activity.
Until more evidence comes forward.
I agree. But if people like yourself stop posting this will just grow colder. Keep the search alive, man.

Keepthesearchalive wrote:

<quoted text>
And all of that generally leads to a walk away, for sure.
But i think... it also left this girl vulnerable in an area not outside of the area of known "serial" activity.
Until more evidence comes forward.
I agree. But if people like yourself stop posting this will just grow colder. Keep the search alive, man.

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Because Advocate emailed me and we discussed it.

Frostman wrote:

Mr. Renner's lasted blog entry is up. Weirder and weirder.

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Because Advocate emailed me and we discussed it.

Judged:

1

amy researches wrote:

Has anyone put together a timeline based on facts from the few public documents available? I don't mean quotes from media, but official documents.
Some such docs were posted to Advocate's old board, but they're no longer there. Did anyone save them?

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Because Advocate emailed me and we discussed it.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
it was her forum; she deleted?

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
The URL I posted shows the timeline. Unless I am only seeing it because it is in my cookies archive??
If you can't see it let me know. I should be able to retrieve it.
Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
There is no search until some other evidence comes up. And what is the "serial activity" you talk about?
Bill

Judged:

2

1

1

Keepthesearchalive wrote:

It also could have led to suicide.
I just dont think at this point...even after all this time... Neither foul-play, suicide, or walkaway can be dismissed.
And while my research would lean me heavily towards walkaway or suicide I am stuck looking at that map of activity and without more to go on I am stuck with three viable possibilities.
But I hope ya'll keep digging.

Judged:

2

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm confused Amy. If you knew they were on the board then you must have seen them yes? Why would advocate e-mail you to discuss it if you weren't a forum member? Why not ask advocate if she saved the docs since she posts here and it was her forum?