Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for the heads up on Mr Renners update . I came away with a stronger feeling that much more is known about what happened. Based on Renners notes it seems they may know her last location and I am not talking about 100 yards away. I wonder if other evidence such as a back pack or liquor bottle may have been found in later searches to determine the last place she may have been.
Why else would they think RF statements were credible and LE strongly believing he saw Maura.

Judged:

2

2

2

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
you, too, have failed to pay attention to the history of this forum...or you'd understand my position in the matter. should be crystal clear.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Base elevation at Monteau is 840 feet.

Judged:

1

1

1

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
History are things that happened in the PAST...I understand there was bashing a long time ago.I clearly understand your position , you are fixated on what happened then.Its over.No locals are being bashed now.But it would be ignorant of me not to consider every person as suspect.Including locals.Including you.

Judged:

1

1

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for the heads up on Mr Renners update . I came away with a stronger feeling that much more is known about what happened. Based on Renners notes it seems they may know her last location and I am not talking about 100 yards away. I wonder if other evidence such as a back pack or liquor bottle may have been found in later searches to determine the last place she may have been.
Why else would they think RF statements were credible and LE strongly believing he saw Maura.

Judged:

2

1

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
? Monteau

citigirl wrote:

Renner has posted in his blog he has thousands of pages of documents and to this day has not posted one. Now he is stating on his blog Why the records were not released. Why would they release them to Renner as he has claimed to have recieved thousands of pages of documents concerning Maura and not Fred? Renner has posted that this is much an active case. Well we all new that because it was turned over to the cold case unit some time ago.

Judged:

2

2

2

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
History are things that happened in the PAST...I understand there was bashing a long time ago.I clearly understand your position , you are fixated on what happened then.Its over.No locals are being bashed now.But it would be ignorant of me not to consider every person as suspect.Including locals.Including you.

Judged:

3

2

2

citigirl wrote:

Renner has posted in his blog he has thousands of pages of documents and to this day has not posted one. Now he is stating on his blog Why the records were not released. Why would they release them to Renner as he has claimed to have recieved thousands of pages of documents concerning Maura and not Fred? Renner has posted that this is much an active case. Well we all new that because it was turned over to the cold case unit some time ago.

Judged:

2

2

citigirl wrote:

Renner has posted in his blog he has thousands of pages of documents and to this day has not posted one. Now he is stating on his blog Why the records were not released. Why would they release them to Renner as he has claimed to have recieved thousands of pages of documents concerning Maura and not Fred? Renner has posted that this is much an active case. Well we all new that because it was turned over to the cold case unit some time ago.

Judged:

2

2

2

findmaura wrote:

"Knowing exactly where we determined the last place she was could be valuable information to that person."
This sentence makes no sense to me.That person they refer to was probably also in the last place with her..So how could that be valuable information to the POI?unless of course the POI was in a blackout.

Judged:

1

1

1

Brilliant Brian wrote:

<quoted text>
It means LE doesn't want the POI to know where LE believes the last place Maura was at. Possibly,(for example)it is on record that LE thinks Maura was seen at a house 5 miles from the accident scene. When they interrogate the POI, they tell him they found MM in the woods. The POI says "Then it couldn't have been me, I was at this house five miles form the accident scene..." So, the POI not knowing where they think she was might help.
However, I think the AG was telling a white lie anyway.

Judged:

1

1

1

Brilliant Brian wrote:

<quoted text>
It means LE doesn't want the POI to know where LE believes the last place Maura was at. Possibly,(for example)it is on record that LE thinks Maura was seen at a house 5 miles from the accident scene. When they interrogate the POI, they tell him they found MM in the woods. The POI says "Then it couldn't have been me, I was at this house five miles form the accident scene..." So, the POI not knowing where they think she was might help.
However, I think the AG was telling a white lie anyway.

Judged:

1

1

1

Emmett Dove wrote:

monteau. Swiftwater Valley Woodsville, NH 1975-Early 1990's
http://www.nelsap.org/nh/monteau.html
Looks like it was beautiful!! I am starting to see why so many go on vacation up yonder..

Judged:

2

2

1

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Your explanation makes perfect sense.But then it gets me thinking,they believe they know the last place she was..How?Who told them?What evidence?Rug?Knife maybe?But in reality her remains would be in the very last place she is/was.

Judged:

1

1

1

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Your explanation makes perfect sense.But then it gets me thinking,they believe they know the last place she was..How?Who told them?What evidence?Rug?Knife maybe?But in reality her remains would be in the very last place she is/was.