Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

SBD called 911 to Hanover at 19:43 NOT TO WOODSVILLE
Hanover in turn called Woodsville dispatch.

mcsmom wrote:

Smith cleared EMS at 20:02
SBD called 911 to Hanover at 19:43 NOT TO WOODSVILLE
Hanover in turn called Woodsville dispatch.
Rhonda Marsh transmission to Smith at 19:48 regarding SBD 911 call
BOL at 19:54
Smith cleared EMS in 6 mins
Smith sent BOL in 6 mins after Marsh transmission.

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

Smith cleared EMS at 20:02
SBD called 911 to Hanover at 19:43 NOT TO WOODSVILLE
Hanover in turn called Woodsville dispatch.
Rhonda Marsh transmission to Smith at 19:48 regarding SBD 911 call
BOL at 19:54
Smith cleared EMS in 6 mins
Smith sent BOL in 6 mins after Marsh transmission.

WTF-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
We all know this and we have gone over it dozens of times. The dispatcher himself states that the lines were busy, its in the log. This matches what SBD said.
Where is the document located that states the times you are referring to? Can that be posted somewhere so everyone can look at it?
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

White Wash wrote:

Hanover transferred it to Grafton County not Woodsville and it's Haverhill.
One of the reasons facts get muddy!
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

WTF-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, 100% of the crashes I have been at, when the person wasn't at the vehicle and wasn't in a nearby house and returned or made contact with the police by phone within several minutes of our arrival on the scene. 100% of those people were either drunk or on other drugs when located.
And in those 6 minutes, why don't you think the officer looked into the car? Seeing the box of wine on the back seat? Or maybe even the splashes inside the car. Is there something stating he didn't do that? I would be surprised if he didn't. And even if he didn't look in the car, I'm sure he had suspicions. Again, it wasn't his first car crash.
Apples to apples.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

WTF-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
We all know this and we have gone over it dozens of times. The dispatcher himself states that the lines were busy, its in the log. This matches what SBD said.
Where is the document located that states the times you are referring to? Can that be posted somewhere so everyone can look at it?
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

White Wash wrote:

The bottom line in NH it's a crime to leave the scene of an accident where you have cause damage to property!
It occurred on the Maricott's land!
So we can can go back and forth all we want the bottom line
is that witnesses have id Maura as the driver and that she requested LE not be called. If Fred Murray isn't saying he's not sure his daughter wasn't drive he HAS PROOF of that or he would be investigating other leads! Fred comes back to that point!
All witness accounts puts her on the driver's side correct which is what? On the other side of the road!
Making it a bit hard for someone to drive by and scoop her up!
Bottom line is she left the scene of her free will why if she wasn't doing anything wrong?
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

White Wash wrote:

The bottom line in NH it's a crime to leave the scene of an accident where you have cause damage to property!
It occurred on the Maricott's land!
So we can can go back and forth all we want the bottom line
is that witnesses have id Maura as the driver and that she requested LE not be called. If Fred Murray isn't saying he's not sure his daughter wasn't drive he HAS PROOF of that or he would be investigating other leads! Fred comes back to that point!
All witness accounts puts her on the driver's side correct which is what? On the other side of the road!
Making it a bit hard for someone to drive by and scoop her up!
Bottom line is she left the scene of her free will why if she wasn't doing anything wrong?
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.mauramurraymissing.com/Documents.h...
Scroll down to the last document.

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

Whiteoutgate.
http://www.mauramurraymissing.com/Documents.h ...

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
She'd likely been drinking at the accident in Hadley, but didn't flee the scene there.

Judged:

1

1

1

White Wash wrote:

The bottom line in NH it's a crime to leave the scene of an accident where you have cause damage to property!
It occurred on the Maricott's land!
So we can can go back and forth all we want the bottom line
is that witnesses have id Maura as the driver and that she requested LE not be called. If Fred Murray isn't saying he's not sure his daughter wasn't drive he HAS PROOF of that or he would be investigating other leads! Fred comes back to that point!
All witness accounts puts her on the driver's side correct which is what? On the other side of the road!
Making it a bit hard for someone to drive by and scoop her up!
Bottom line is she left the scene of her free will why if she wasn't doing anything wrong?
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

White Wash wrote:

Dispatch sent a copy to Helena Bill!
What was release had some information edited from another
case so which is why the big stink huge cover up!
Times and information oddly remains the same regardless how you
trying make it fits ones needs!
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
My bad, I'm not a townie.

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would dispatch send anything to Helena?

Judged:

2

2

2

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean Marrotte?
What property damage? If you know it would certainly help to end some speculation.
Didn't witnesses also place her at the trunk?