Maura Murray

Emmett Dove wrote:

whats weird is, that the mere mention of going to another site brings about so many replies.. Like you want people to stay here so you can see what all they say..
you can curse me, critise me, whatever.. I had a very long unwanted conversation last night from people in Concord.. & was told not to engage with you people.. Thats what I am doing..
Not worth my license..

Judged:

1

1

1

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm baffled by your repeated claims of multi-monikered posters. I haven't seen any 'troll' activities here,(at least, not lately)- thought I spied some on the McCarty thread, but I may have been wrong.
I think it was implied a few weeks ago that perhaps Emmett was not Emmett - and I'll admit, a few of his posts ('over yonder' etc) gave me pause. I no longer think there's any feasibility he is a poseur.
---
This is like deja vu, all over again - Mason, aka Fred Leatherman, was doubted BIG time, despite his best efforts. I'm glad that was able to be cleared up.
---
In regards to Columbo - in Illinois, we have the Department of Professional Regulation, where you can check online to verify the professional license of the individual in question. I understand that Amy called the Dept. to verify the PI license of Columbo - but I also understand that any Joe Blow could easily give a name of a REAL PI, and thus be 'confirmed'. I don't know if Columbo would be willing to do this, but here in Illinois, we receive little business-card size licenses confirming our registration with the Department of Professional Regulation. He could easily block out his name, but only leave the "Private Investigator License" title viewable, and block out parts of his license number (so no one could find out his real name that way). He could post a link to tinypic or whatever site he chose, to upload the image, with the items blacked out. That would clearly verify him, and should end all discussion on the subject.
Heck, perhaps Renner wouldn't mind posting it (still blacked out, of course). The very possession of a private investigator license, in your hand, is excellent proof that you are a PI. Not indisputable, but nearly so.

Judged:

1

1

1

Laurieisgone wrote:

John- they don't have a life, anyone that is on here that often doesn't have anything else. I feel badly for them in a way. You have to just feel sorry that after all of these years, and after being so tired of all the theories they STILL keep coming back, bored or not. That is sad...Maybe they live in the basement of Mom's house, eating chips and drinking diet coke just checking the boards, checking the boards.
I'm not going anywhere either, but I'd like to also see what that other board has to say.

Judged:

2

2

2

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm baffled by your repeated claims of multi-monikered posters. I haven't seen any 'troll' activities here,(at least, not lately)- thought I spied some on the McCarty thread, but I may have been wrong.
I think it was implied a few weeks ago that perhaps Emmett was not Emmett - and I'll admit, a few of his posts ('over yonder' etc) gave me pause. I no longer think there's any feasibility he is a poseur.
---

---

Judged:

1

1

1

Emmett Dove wrote:

<quoted text>
You just quoted a troll! That is what she is, nothing more.. Read this whole thread, she offers no insight, no "good" discussion.. Just wiki links, definitions, & loads of sarcasm. People say & think she was a lawyer? Well, maybe a "public pretender" up yonder, but more or less just a lonely person full of hatred with nothing else to do. IF she was a lawyer, its highly doubful she was any good...
There are several "multi - monikered" posters here.. Mostly being the same trolls you see everyday.. They make the same spelling errors & have even accidently posted back to back & "whoops" exposed..
Also, posting your credintials, does no good here.. I could post all of mine, it still wouldnt matter.. Ive posted links to songs, its easy to type in my name on google & find out what all I really do, & its hard to be on harvards network if you didnt go, because you have to have one of their personal .edu emails..
All I can prove, & I am still a "street punk" .. These people mock most of you (including me) in the most uncivil ways, regardless of what the truth may or may not be..
I have even seen on of these so called "BHR Freedom Fighters", The Topix 3, use words like irregardless (which is a double negative), but I get flamed for using yall & yonder..

Judged:

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

UPDATE;
Det. Columbo is not going anywhere. I will not be told to go anywhere by anyone.
WTH....You are nothing but a washed up loser who has nothing better to do than harass people on this forum and probably many others.
It is My right to discuss ANY theory that I like. Whether or not You agree and want to see it that is not My problem.
You would like all of us to just go away and make it easy for You, BUT then what would You do with all your free time.
You more than likely are a thorn in the side of anyone You come close to.
I am so sick of Your Bullshit and Your demeaning tone to Myself as well as other posters. Maybe You are the one that should go to a private forum where the world will not have to listen to Your negativity towards the rest of the people in the world who do not meet Your expectations.
Get a life
John

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
i thought you were leaving? yesterday? and this morning?
oh, joy, you're back!(dripping with sarcasm).
how-to-what-to do with a sharpened bamboo stick isn't..."uncivil"?

Judged:

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

Snowy....
Let's meet at The Dutch treat where We met the first time and sat in the bar in the corner booth seats. Had a couple beers (I did and we were there with Chris and Mr. R, Nickle Investigations and a few more. It was after the Greg Floyd trial if I remember right.
If I see You in person I will show You MY ID and then You can tell the Non-Believers the TRUTH.
John

Judged:

1

1

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
i assume it is you i met. for the record, i am not a drinker; i enjoyed an olive and DTreats/appetizers with the group. i won't harp on the point further, John, but if the occasion should arise again (though it is unlikely), i'll be certain to ask you to verify your claims.
trust you are aware that many folks are inclined to boast about their credentials online?

Det Columbo wrote:

Snowy....
It is My hope that You will not put My Real name out on this forum or share it with others on this forum or in a private venue.
I have had lots of tension with You but I have never shared Your name with the group and I never will.
Nor have I shared anyone elses name here whom I have identified and will not do that either.
Just sick of having people try to push me around. I will not budge.
John
John