Maura Murray

Anne wrote:

Unfortunately, the attacks against MM participants have been prevelant since the beginning of these topix forum. It is organized and subject to group support. If there were any reprieve toward helpful and useful information, I have not witnessed it. Lady Gray gave the most positive post in the passed weeks by sharing her advice to proceed toward websleuth.

Because helpful and useful information from outside the group is ignored as it does not conform to the "group" ideas.
Why is Lady Gray's post so positive? She wants some to come to a site where you get banned if the moderator doesn't like what you say. Or is there another reason she wants us to go to the site?
BTW, what happened to advocaters site????

Dawn wrote:

Anne - I have never heard of anyone else. Please tell us. it could .. change everything!!

Dawn, I am the only one who mistakenly placed the information on a public forum, you will have to go to law enforcement for further information.

Ricky Smith wrote:

She have a relative on her mother's side with a 2nd home in Bethlehem? LE might want to check?

here is ricky smiths previous post

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>Dawn. I hate to burst your bubble, I was not the only one to hear the chatter or report it.

Anne are you saying that someone else "OUTSIDE" of your house also heard the second accident. This is new information.
Who did you and they report it too?

Dawn wrote:

Anne - I have never heard of anyone else. Please tell us. it could .. change everything!!

I've never hear of anyone else either except for Anne and someone else (family member) that was in her house. Funny how brand new information seems to pop out of nowhere. Hmmmm

Maura searches has been performed in every direction but --- NORTH? For a reason?

Dawn wrote:

<quoted text>
here is ricky smiths previous post

Sure they haven´t checked?

The westmans house is close to the road as well as the W.B. Marrottes house sits back off the rd, 100' ft. or so. CW house is also approx. 80 to 100" back from 112.

The stand of trees Maura supposedly hit would be somewhere between the end of the sharp curve and the beginning of The Marrottes actual lawn.

If it is the stand of three (3) trees then it would be between the tree with the ribbons and the beginning of The Marrottes actual lawn.
----------
WHITEWASH..

Please tell Me where the car really was when Lavoies pick it up.

Calypso Soldier wrote:

The westmans house is close to the road as well as the W.B. Marrottes house sits back off the rd, 100' ft. or so. CW house is also approx. 80 to 100" back from 112.
The stand of trees Maura supposedly hit would be somewhere between the end of the sharp curve and the beginning of The Marrottes actual lawn.
If it is the stand of three (3) trees then it would be between the tree with the ribbons and the beginning of The Marrottes actual lawn.
----------
WHITEWASH..
Please tell Me where the car really was when Lavoies pick it up.

Calypso Soldier/ K-9 Handler/ Columbo or whatever your name is tonight, you are posting in different forums crime statistics for NH from 1960-2009 and going to the trouble of measuring how wide the roads are and other unimportant nonsense.
Why????????

Calypso Soldier wrote:

The westmans house is close to the road as well as the W.B. Marrottes house sits back off the rd, 100' ft. or so. CW house is also approx. 80 to 100" back from 112.
The stand of trees Maura supposedly hit would be somewhere between the end of the sharp curve and the beginning of The Marrottes actual lawn.
If it is the stand of three (3) trees then it would be between the tree with the ribbons and the beginning of The Marrottes actual lawn.
----------
WHITEWASH..
Please tell Me where the car really was when Lavoies pick it up.

There is a stand of three trees and it is on their front lawn.
If you live close enough to drive there get a new pair of glasses and look again.

Was the reason for dropping the bomb re the relative at this particular time that this person recently passed away? Just wondering.

OK Whatever....

Whether they are on their front lawn or not...yada yada.

The question was to Whitewash:

Where did Lavoies actually pick the car up from ?

It was not on their lawn it was in the road wasn't it?

WOWZER... Do You know where the car actually was that night seeing YOU LIVE SO CLOSE.

I am who I am.

Calypso Soldier wrote:

OK Whatever....
Whether they are on their front lawn or not...yada yada.
The question was to Whitewash:
Where did Lavoies actually pick the car up from ?
It was not on their lawn it was in the road wasn't it?
WOWZER... Do You know where the car actually was that night seeing YOU LIVE SO CLOSE.
I am who I am.

Calypso said:***So which tree or trees did she hit with the saturn? The big pine or the three little ones. NONE of them had damage to them so it must not have happened.***
Since you've inspected the trees and the car at Lavoies and state that she DID NOT hit any trees then why don't you tell us what happened since you seem to know all the "facts".
Since you were right at Lavoies and so interested in what happened did you ask him any questions?
You've gone to the trouble of linking a Google map to prove the trees were not on the front lawn and then when someone tells you that they ARE on the lawn and to go look yourself you just say.....
OK Whatever....
Whether they are on their front lawn or not...yada yada

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
......{text deleted} Why is Lady Gray's post so positive? She wants some to come to a site where you get banned if the moderator doesn't like what you say. Or is there another reason she wants us to go to the site?{text deleted}

Goodness gracious -- why are you paranoid? What reason could there possibly be for wanting to be able to be on a site where conversations can be held without being accused of anything other than wanting to - rationally - discuss the disappearance of a young lady?

And it's a sight where your postings get edited if one is rude or banned if they are repeatedly rude. Not for any reason other than that. Paranoia once again. Please don't misread anything into this.

I will never understand all of this.....I won't. It's beyond my comprehension as to why this type of mentality is adopted....

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Anne are you saying that someone else "OUTSIDE" of your house also heard the second accident. This is new information.
Who did you and they report it too?

Thank you Wowzer!!!

Please .......... EVEN the Hanson Whitman Express - a respected AWARD winning publication could not find ONE other person to come forward - and my bubble should not burst. More list a bubble that was sent to a missing persons family... disgraceful. and these LOCALS did try to help.. HELLO.. anyone ( other that already see it) see how INSANE some of this behavior is.. at first glance - you see something else - I did. Then you realize the smoke and mirrors is from the damn wrong side of the damn road!!!!!!!!!!1 you mind wont believe it at first.. you think nooooo.. OPEN YOUR EYES. I wont say I agree entirely with fred leatherman.. but go back and read the 10 or 12 red herring piece he did......... IT WILLOPEN you eyes. and then watch this.

Mauras family is lucky for WTF Wowzer who keep people off on craziness that will never help the investigation... sigh.. wish I could speak this rather than type

Anne
Can you get the federal RCW from EWB? Since you respect anything she says. I think a Federal law for Telecom is IMPORTANT you bet. For the missing its brought up in DC - ALL THE TIME. What RCW was she referring to? The one she said she reviewed and had been abided by. I will not sit by and let false information go out to the public - not when a family of the missing could read it. It would be negligent for me to do so. I don't quote laws - I'm not a lawyer but I am familar with the laws regarding Telecom and she is wrong. Its a flat out LIE. i will just say it. I have been polite for a not true ( hint - three letter word starts with L ends in E) I wont anymore.

NOW.......... you will believe anything she says - as IF to tell other posters - she is a nice honest upstanding citizen. FACT is - it was a lie. SOOOOOOOOOOOOo tell me this Anne.

If someone is going to lie about a FEDERAL law? what on EARTH would make you think anything else they said was true? The person could be complete nut case - we do NOT know if she works for NaMus.. If she does - I do not think they would want that type of false info......... oh..remember when it was the very same person EWB who threatened my job.. wondering if i was posting at work.. how things make full circle. beuaty is i work in COMMUNICATIONS and i have free reign.. but.. come on..that should show integrity along with what was done with beagle. I hope she is banned from the other forum. i haven't been there yet.. going to check because just what happened to beagle........ of all things to be banned for.. that is one of them. for sure.

now anne,, back to how you respect everything she says.. you still believe that? if so.. speaks volumes

anne also for what is worth... as the pointy boots brigade knows.. on advocates forum with the private messages - you need to know.. they all do NOT believe you. maybe in email to you personally they do. but i have to tell you.. be careful who you go to bat for - because that same bat maybe used against you.. I know for a fact that is TRUE. I know that when i was talking to them was true as well becuase I had messages and emails forwarded.. love your friends .. keep your enemies closer. i dont know if anyone ever told you and hate to do it on an open forum. just know.......... most dont believe that call ( pointy boots ) not the rest of us.( us too ) but your friends aren't who you think they are! that hurt but I feel better because i cringe everytime i see you put yourself out there knowing.. what i know.. and i was told this as a NEW poster. back then..

speaking of my Beagle.... He is missed and i hope others will comment and ask him as well. I do know he reads the forum.

Beagle- I miss you -you are missed.. come back~ please.

hannah..do you have a anon email you can post here? we need to TALK. my grammar sucks - my writing skills suck ( oh.. how i miss reading beagles posts - I can recognize it just cant do it) so hannah... 3 ?

ROLL CALL ??? who is here.( not expecting an answer.. I know MOST)

now after 4 months of only Anne from the "group" posting. what on EARTH could have made these guest appearances.......... read from page 60 on..

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure they haven´t checked?

no idea.. actually..........my last email to the family was replied to - TO ME about ME. talk about funny. Now I know what they REALLY think fo me.:-). 1 one thousand..two one thousand..three one thousand. inside joke. NOT aimed at you hannah