Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

1

Det Columbo wrote:

JWB....Is that You....How was vacation.?
Just down in your area yesterday with My cousin doing the tourist thing and checking things out.
Drove by Bill and Bob's just to see the building....Oh I want a RB sandwich so bad. Soon very soon.!
John

Judged:

3

3

2

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Vacation was great gracias senor Juan (mexico). Great weather and happy hour 3-7.
Yea B&B should stay open all year long

Judged:

2

2

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text> Vacation was great gracias senor Juan (mexico). Great weather and happy hour 3-7. Yea B&B should stay open all year long

Judged:

1

1

1

Desenrascanco wrote:

<quoted text>
missed your comments during your vaca... So, you went to mexico? I always wanted to go, but heard it was pretty dangerous as far as taxi drivers & cartells & stuff.. do you mind if I ask what part?

Judged:

1

1

1

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, have you even had time to unpack yet? Did you miss us here in the land of witch hunts, name calling and hyper-partisanship?
Came across this short article by a former LEO and now PI in NY titled "Missing Person or Homicide?" (a couple of interesting comments also.)
http://managementresources.wordpress.com/2011...

Judged:

1

1

1

jwb wrote:

It looks like the second accident can be put to bed based on Anne's replies.

Judged:

2

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
My Wife told me (sternly) before we landed in Mexico to stay away from the computer. I caught up on the many pages,videos and happenings from the week I missed. Good to see Anne and Whiston join in.

Judged:

3

3

3

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>jwb I would not say that because there still is the problem of the timeline being so much earlier than the official time. I will always wonder what went on prior to the official reports because there is no doubt in my mind that she was being searched for before the official reports state. Lots of scenarios have been explored and it seems possible there was a car slid off the road prior
to car in a ditch. enuf.
Question, How is it that such a clear description of female and height was given so quickly. Was her liscense in the car? I know SBD gave a description but they were looking for female about 5 7 before his call got to dispatch.

Judged:

2

2

1

Snowy wrote:

so, the multi-monikered come and go, play in the sandbox, play dumb or throw sand.
some make an appearance before retreating back to the woodwork to nibble on a few pieces of cheese.
8 years is a long time.
hope something changes soon, but it seems doubtful.

Judged:

5

4

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>jwb I would not say that because there still is the problem of the timeline being so much earlier than the official time. I will always wonder what went on prior to the official reports because there is no doubt in my mind that she was being searched for before the official reports state. Lots of scenarios have been explored and it seems possible there was a car slid off the road prior
to car in a ditch. enuf.
Question, How is it that such a clear description of female and height was given so quickly. Was her liscense in the car? I know SBD gave a description but they were looking for female about 5 7 before his call got to dispatch.

Judged:

2

2

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Haha bill, u def make a point there. Clearly no worthwhile conclusions can be drawn from this phot copy of a crappy photo that was scanned into a computer.
But idk, I'm obviously not saying this is definitely a bruise but it sure as hell looks like it to me, & it just doesn't look like a camera artifact to my eye. It just has that classic bruise shape I've seen many times, looks like the bruise was healing.
Her eyeliner was definitely running but that's not what we r talking about, we r talking about the big black blotch on the left side of her nose(her left side). You can see a smaller black spot in her right side, looks like she was hit square in the nose and almost broke her nose.
she's clearly wearing eyeliner so that raises the question of why was she wearing makeup that night? It's been stated by her family that Maura never wore makeup, but she was wearing it.
Was she wearing it to cover ip bruising?
Something was going on in her life in Amherst that wasn't good & it would seem that this could be the answer to what happened to her.
Maybe If Fred wasn't so adamant about her prior life not nattering we wouldn't be having this conversation today and someone would be sitting in jail instead.
I mean come on, "it doesn't matter, find her!" what kind of crap is that?
Are you trying to find your daughter or not?
Anybody who has any inclination of how an investigation works would know that the weeks leading up to the event are most likely going to tell you what happened.
So Fred supposedly has no idea why she was going up there, how would he possibly kno that no one was travelling with her either in her car or in tandem? How could he possibly not wanttjis avenue looked into?
There's a 99% chance that if a crime took place it was someone Maura knew and most likely was close to.
It's just weird

Judged:

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>But idk, I'm obviously not saying this is definitely a bruise but it sure as hell looks like it to me, & it just doesn't look like a camera artifact to my eye. It just has that classic bruise shape I've seen many times, looks like the bruise was healing.

Judged:

2

2

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>....Question, How is it that such a clear description of female and height was given so quickly. Was her liscense in the car? I know SBD gave a description but they were looking for female about 5 7 before his call got to dispatch.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree its not a camera artifact. It's a computer algorithm artifact from the dithering. I suspect it is a shadow, the dithering algorithm has to chose make it white, make it black, it chose black there, too much black, The pattern of the black reminds you of a bruise. It is the same type of artifact and error, just opposite in white, as what is shown on the forehead.
Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I should also point out that even though the white blotch on her forehead is actually a much bigger artifact of the dithering, because you don't recognize the pattern, you likely didn't even really notice it.?? You stay alive because you and your eyes recognize patterns. The forehead blotch didn't match anything stored in your brain as meaningful. If on the other hand it had contorted to be shaped like a lightning bolt, you might have thought that she was related to Harry Potter. 8-)
Bill

Judged:

2

2

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I should also point out that even though the white blotch on her forehead is actually a much bigger artifact of the dithering, because you don't recognize the pattern, you likely didn't even really notice it.?? You stay alive because you and your eyes recognize patterns. The forehead blotch didn't match anything stored in your brain as meaningful. If on the other hand it had contorted to be shaped like a lightning bolt, you might have thought that she was related to Harry Potter. 8-)
Bill