Maura Murray

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I have posted several questions asking about things I think are honest, objective questions. Some of these posts have been deleted, others unanswered.
I've asked if anyone knows who was with her at the parties in Goshen (NYE) and at the dorm party the night her dad was in town. I've asked if anyone ever confirmed the rumor that she had a boyfriend in Amherst, and if so whether he was questioned. I've asked if a gentleman named Mason who used to post on Advocate's board ever was able to obtain the work records for Fred's alibi. I've asked if LE was informed of Maura's past, or if it was just kept out of the public/media.
I understand if no one has the answers or is allowed to say. But the response has been to accuse me of having an agenda, working for Renner, tell me I am Beagle or his lawyer etc. Someone also phoned me from a blocked number to "mind my own F-ing business". Related to this? I don't know. But I don't get calls like that on a normal afternoon. Maybe this place is making me paranoid.
I just think they are legitimate questions. I am not trying to accuse anyone or pry into anyone's life, or anything like that. I try to be objective and look at the big picture, and part of this picture is missing.

Judged:

2

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
There are some characters on this forum without a doubt. And while I disagree with some of the people here I don't believe hardly any of them are dangerous, though I could be wrong. What I would be more concerned with is I often see that there are 40 people looking at this forum. I have not a clue who probably thirty-five of them are. I suspect that I would be far more concerned with them.
The other part is, many, many things we don't know about. Event the things we think we know about is sometimes to have questions.
It is the nature of the beast. If there is one fact here that is immutable it is if twenty people look at one fact there is likely to be twenty different opinions on what that fact means.
Bill

Snowy wrote:

what, exactly, is the "golden egg" or "golden goose" theory? does it relate to a boyfriend?
another question that's been unanswered.

Consider this wrote:

<quoted text>
Reflection from the flash on oily skin?

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
The golden egg theory was discussed via e-mail by certain forum members. Dawn spilled the beans on Topix. Supposedly it was a man (she was seeing)that worked in Wilmington at a certain company and lived in Manchester. I guess he was married. Not sure if Dawn was being tested to see if she could keep a secret, which she did not..lol. She gave a first name also.
I do not e-mail anyone, so I don't know the real story, but this is what was posted on Topix. I gave her a lot of crap for it because she annonced the company he worked for & his very unique first name. Probably another load of turd.

Snowy wrote:

what, exactly, is the "golden egg" or "golden goose" theory? does it relate to a boyfriend?
another question that's been unanswered.

Judged:

2

1

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>wowzer, your sarcasm is getting old, you might want to take a break!

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I thought that I coined the "golden egg" theory. I was referring to Beagles theory that Maura was kidnapped to harvest her genetically superior eggs. Making her genetically superior breeding stock. She wasn't needed, just her eggs according to the theory, Beagles theory. At least that is what I think that was.
Bill

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I think you're right, Bill.
This is one of the biggest messes I've ever seen. I don't know what is really going on here, but whatever it is it's not good.
It's impossible to find the truth by sorting through lies.
Do I have to get a permission slip from Snowy to change my username to "amy sits and waits"?:-)

Judged:

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I thought that I coined the "golden egg" theory. I was referring to Beagles theory that Maura was kidnapped to harvest her genetically superior eggs. Making her genetically superior breeding stock. She wasn't needed, just her eggs according to the theory, Beagles theory. At least that is what I think that was.
Bill

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that Manchester nh and wilmington Mass ?

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, I was kidding on trying to figure out what it was. It might be that. The point was the her head wasn't likely painted white like that, and speaks to the point that artifacts from the algorithm caused it to be washed out. If it had made a recognizable pattern instead of what it shows as, we would likely be talking about it.
Bill

Judged:

2

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>Is that Manchester nh and wilmington Mass ?

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I might point out that is when I started to not read most of Beagles posts because they seemed to drum the same thing over and over. If I have misinterpreted his theory I am sure someone will straighten me out. It was a conspiracy fueled by the need of genetic researchers in Massachusetts. That is why they needed Maura's excellent eggs.
That was why I needed to stop reading it. I almost herniated myself laughing.
Bill

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
nope. i recall it originated from a high priestess duck and was communicated to a non-duck. had something to do with a DVD....evidence in police custody.
anyone?
we seem to be in rotation mode.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
I was asking honest questions Anne. This is how you answer, by telling me I'm sarcastic and need a break? I guess you either cannot or won't answer my questions.
Oh and I don't need a break, had a nice nap earlier.Thanks for thinking of my well being though.