Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

Sorry about the double post, it didn't show up over here so I took the time to rewrite my post. Then once I posted it I saw that it did get posted originally.
Again I'm sorry if any of my posts sounded cruel, not intended that way. But I truly feel scammed by Fred in regards to what he said to media for the first few years.
Again, why the fuck would he be entitled to onside info if he won't even sit down for an interview with LE for 2 years?? Sorry bunthats not how it works, just because it's your daughter missing does not mean your automatically not a suspect, actually it's the exact opposite.
A family member goes missing or gets killed you r the #1 suspect until you r eliminated. It's a sad fact of life that people kill people in their own family. It's crazy that that's true IMO, but unfortunately it is

mcsmom wrote:

Article published Dec 29, 2005
Haverhill
Father keeps up hunt for daughter Sues state in case of missing woman
The Associated Press
Ayotte said between the state police, the Fish and Game Department, other law-enforcement agencies and her own office, thousands of hours have been spent on the investigation.
"The case continues to be pursued vigorously," she said. "Mr. Murray's had frequent contact with both my office and members of the state police. In fact, I personally met with him along with lead investigators of the state police last spring and he was assigned a victim's witness advocate from my office," who has been in contact with him regularly, she said.
The police also have said that they talk with Murray on a regular basis when new leads appear.

Judged:

2

2

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok, now I'm scared.

Judged:

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Did he show you proof of who and what he was?

Judged:

1

1

1

Captain Jack wrote:

<quoted text>

As you said,“She looks wicked cute in these pictures but how are they gonna’ help find her? What’s your point? What is your implication? It would be difficult to take a picture of Maura that wasn’t a good picture. She is a lovely looking young woman, who I might add, is unconditionally loved.
Which brings me to the “pseudo mug shot,” the one a few people have questioned is even Maura. We see no proof that this was even taken by the PD. There are more questions than answers. My first response after seeing it was,“OMG … that picture looks like the person was kept hostage & not fed well.
Maura looked well at Christmas, a month or two after that picture? What goes on here?

Judged:

4

4

3

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>Amy, That is not my intention just want people to know this is not a 'little' disappearance and it was brought right into our yard, unexpectedly a while back. I am very careful what I post. I wish I had never posted originally and I know of at least 6 others who didnt and are glad they didnt. All I said initially is that the first chatter we heard was about 7.

Judged:

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok a couple more things here, my point to the wicked cute comment was that it seemed like the family was more interested in releasing good pictures of her than accurate ones. I would think a more recent pic would b much better than one of her at west point looking all perfect.
My whole point was that it seemed likethw family was more interested in protecting her image as the "all American girl" than actually finding her. I'm not saying that was definitely the case but looking back on everything it sure seems like it.
Look at the pic from when she got busted, looks absolutely nothing like the pics we were shown early on. Judging by what happened to her that night with the accident and everything a picture where she didn't look so good mightve helped more.
After viewing that pic i was like wtf? That looks nothing like the Maura I think of, that made me go bak and look at the other pics closer. That was when I realized we were shown senior pics, prom pics and west point pics. Just seems odd. & I know maura was beautiful but dont tell me the family didn't have some other pics that weren't quite as good. Like one where she wasn't smiling maybe?
Are you saying that's not maura in the picture from the dorm?? Are you saying renner was making the whole thing up about going to UMass police who gave him this pic? If the cops didn't give it to him where did he get the pic from?
Is it not Maura?
I haven't heard anyone offer up anything that makes me think that's not Maura or not a legitimate photo.

Judged:

3

2

1

Consider this wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
It doesn't appear that he did wait 2 or 2 1/2 years....Ms. Ayotte was then the Attorney General for the State of NH

Judged:

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, this is not good. If I could private message you I would tell you more. Thank you for sharing what you did though, as at least now I know I'm not crazy for worrying.

Judged:

2

1

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>Amy, That is not my intention just want people to know this is not a 'little' disappearance and it was brought right into our yard, unexpectedly a while back. I am very careful what I post. I wish I had never posted originally and I know of at least 6 others who didnt and are glad they didnt. All I said initially is that the first chatter we heard was about 7.

Judged:

2

1

1

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

<quoted text>
She has stated this several times just in the past couple weeks. She never states, with specificity, who she is speaking of. Just 'multi-monikered'. I see you asked, and she declined to answer.
That's par for the course. I believe Bill calls it - throwing a turd?

Judged:

1

1

1

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
Snowy, calling others multi-monikered? Well... it takes one to know one.

Judged:

2

2

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey if I am wrong here I'll gladly admit that. I would hope that I am.
But watch the interview with scarinza on the ID show, he was clearly frustrated with freds lack of cooperation in regards to talking about her prior life in Amherst. Which is crazy if you think about it.
How could he possibly know that didn't matter?
How could he possibly know she wasn't travelling up Nh with someOne from UMass, which actually makes sense If u think about it. She won't drive her car around town but shell drive it to Nh?
That doesn't make much sense to me unless she was travelling with someone else. Not saying that I think that to be the case but that would make a lot more sense.

Judged:

3

3

2

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Yesss!!
I too have to join in on the clarification of the scanner incident. I am totally confused with your different statements from prior & now.
Thanks

Judged:

3

3

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Anne...I recall to this day your very first MMM post regarding the scanner call....you posted 'was taken in private vehicle" subsequent posts were "left in private vehicle"..
Any reason for the change in word

Judged:

1

1

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>was taken in private vehicle, is correct mcsmom..I can no longer measure each word as I say it. I wish she could be found as all here do.