Maura Murray

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>He was not FBI. He was not threatening. He brought up recent bust Haverhill PD made as good job for small department. I agreed. He made direct reference to an ongoing discussion on topix. I simply kept trying to get him back to his initial question concerning trying to find a cabin in the woods that was suppose to be nearby. At the time he stated he was working in western massachusetts. I was annoyed at his 'fishing', and not speaking directly. That was the gist of his conversation. He looked like a salesman but I wasn't taking any of his leads! I suggested he stop at either one of 2 neighbors, they might know. He left and stopped at neither place.

Judged:

2

2

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>He was not FBI. He was not threatening. He brought up recent bust Haverhill PD made as good job for small department. I agreed. He made direct reference to an ongoing discussion on topix. I simply kept trying to get him back to his initial question concerning trying to find a cabin in the woods that was suppose to be nearby. At the time he stated he was working in western massachusetts. I was annoyed at his 'fishing', and not speaking directly. That was the gist of his conversation. He looked like a salesman but I wasn't taking any of his leads! I suggested he stop at either one of 2 neighbors, they might know. He left and stopped at neither place.

Judged:

2

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

Anne I don't get it, now you've been threatened by someone associated with the FBI?!? Really??
Or did he just come to your house wearing his gun?
I don't get it, why would they threaten you? Because you heard the scanner call that's been covered up by the Haverhill pd? Even if that's what happened why would somebody associates with the FBI give a shit? Wouldn't it be a local who would threaten you?
What do u mean this case has wider implications? Are you really saying that this is like a nation-wide coverup?
Did that really happen?
How did this guy even know where you live? Do u have your adress associated with tour topix account? Why would you do that?
You say he has "spy equipment"..did he hack topix to get your info?
I know you've said what road u live on at some point over the years but theoretically that's not even enuf to know which house is your or who u are exactly.
Why would anyone in any other part of the country except mass and Nh care at all abou what your saying about the case?
Is it that your info about the scanner is soo important and soo accurate that your scaring even the FBI?
Are you suggesting that there's a coverup that goes all the way up to the federal gov't?
I'm not trying to badmouth u or jump down your throat here but what is up with those posts you just made?
Why would some guy who trains the FBI, who supposedly lives in Ct but jas Nevada plates give 2 shits about what your posting on some message board that maybe a few hundred people read(if that) and maybe a few thousand people have EVER read over the years.
I mean come on, it's not like these forums effect the real workd or anything. I don't know ANYONE who's EVER read any of this crap.
Why did u feel the need to check where your
Bullets were? Someone in LE showed ip with a gun on his hip? Isn't that where LE always wires their guns? Did you load your gun? You mist not have felt that threatened if you didn't load your gun right? I mean, what's knowing where your bullets r gonna do for you if someone breaks out there gun? What r u gonna do say hold on I gotta go load my gun?

Judged:

3

3

3

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Last night was a new Disappeared case. The family was very forth coming in stating that the man before he disappeared had tried drugs before, and went missing after he was at a house where drugs were involved. It was refreshing to have truth and honesty.

Judged:

1

1

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>He was not threatening.

Judged:

1

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
an earlier quote:
"He introduced himself and when I went to check on bullets I wrote his car and liscense and had it checked." ~Anne
really, what a waste of bandwidth.

looking4amoose wrote:

<quoted text>Taken in a private vehicle implies that the person was not alone---she left with someone else who was driving......left in a private vehicle is neutral---doesn't imply either--the person was alone or accompanied by another.

Judged:

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>his mannerisms were not threatening and be assured some of what he said I did not repeat. He made the hair stand up on the back of my neck,...

Judged:

1

1

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>his mannerisms were not threatening and be assured some of what he said I did not repeat. He made the hair stand up on the back of my neck, but since you are collaborating with Jenkins on the book, I'll leave the blanks for you to fill in!

Judged:

3

2

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>He made the hair stand up on the back of my neck,

Judged:

1

emknavy wrote:

http://www.facebook.com/photo. php?fbid=192137260823838&s et=a.146497805387784.19050.100 000826969912&type=3&th eater
I'm not saying that Julie Murray via this facebook link is Maura by any means. I am saying look at the picture taken May 27 2011. A woman with her hair tied back extremely tight and a young man in a camo cap. The woman definitely resembles even very old pictures of Maura. The lines in the cheeks, the outline of the gums on the teeth, the hair line etc. Most importantly, this woman has blue eyes while the other pictures of Julie Murray have dark brown. Julie Murray's other pictures also appear to have more defined wrinkles. I google imaged Maura and compared about a dozen pics to this Julie Murray pic on May 27 2011. The similarities are amazing. Something in Julie Murray's other pics is not quite as similar as this.
Perhaps, I'm crazy. It could very well be after spending so many hours researching this case.
google image link
( http://www.google.com/imgres... )

Judged:

2

1

1

emknavy wrote:

http://www.facebook.com/photo. php?fbid=192137260823838&s et=a.146497805387784.19050.100 000826969912&type=3&th eater
I'm not saying that Julie Murray via this facebook link is Maura by any means. I am saying look at the picture taken May 27 2011. A woman with her hair tied back extremely tight and a young man in a camo cap. The woman definitely resembles even very old pictures of Maura. The lines in the cheeks, the outline of the gums on the teeth, the hair line etc. Most importantly, this woman has blue eyes while the other pictures of Julie Murray have dark brown. Julie Murray's other pictures also appear to have more defined wrinkles. I google imaged Maura and compared about a dozen pics to this Julie Murray pic on May 27 2011. The similarities are amazing. Something in Julie Murray's other pics is not quite as similar as this.
Perhaps, I'm crazy. It could very well be after spending so many hours researching this case.
google image link
( http://www.google.com/imgres... )

Judged:

1

1

1

Just me--paris wrote:

<quoted text>One thing I've always noticed is the slight "hook" in Maura's smile. What I mean is the left upper lip and the way one of her front teeth are more exposed. Also, they make contact lenses in colors now. People have asked me if I'm wearing them b/c I have that same color eyes as Julie. But, you're right, this picture somehow looks younger than Maura might look. I am amazed by it.