Maura Murray

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
Amherst is a separate issue.
this reference and so-called search was mentioned by Anne in the context and in the vicinity of Anne's locale...where she made specific reference to 'several others' looking for MM prior to the dispatch she supposedly heard. she refused to elaborate on exactly the number of individuals looking for MM, but made it clear she knew of these individuals and had confirmed this information with them.
still, without evidence, these are not facts.
in addition, also to my recollection, she was advised by Wowzer and others to bring this information to the attention of authorities.
old news. it shouldn't even be repeated, as her account has not been confirmed.

Thanks for clearifying, Snowy.

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>Sara, I am not convinced either. I think its entirely possible there was a previous accident that night.

Anne for years you've stated that you KNOW what you heard, an earlier accident, and you had someone in your house that heard it too.
Even when some said there was nothing in the dispatch logs or police reports about it and no one else heard it that night but you , you still stuck to your story.
Now you are saying that it's entirely possible that there was another accident that night. Possible?????
Can you explain how it is possible that you and whoever was in your house are the only ones in the state of NH that heard this previous accident and could remember it happening months or years later. Can't quite remember how long it was before you remembered hearing it(several months or years) and brought it to the attention of the MM forum.

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>I dont know exactly who was looking for her but some were.

If you don't know "exactly" who was looking can you give a wild guess who it might have been? I thought you had previously said you knew who they were.
How did you know they were looking for her earlier if you don't know who they were? Makes no sense.
Whoever told you must know who they were. Maybe you could ask them and get back to us as I'd love to know. Thanks

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
Amherst is a separate issue.
this reference and so-called search was mentioned by Anne in the context and in the vicinity of Anne's locale...where she made specific reference to 'several others' looking for MM prior to the dispatch she supposedly heard. she refused to elaborate on exactly the number of individuals looking for MM, but made it clear she knew of these individuals and had confirmed this information with them.
still, without evidence, these are not facts.
in addition, also to my recollection, she was advised by Wowzer and others to bring this information to the attention of authorities.
old news. it shouldn't even be repeated, as her account has not been confirmed.

I couldn't have said it any better.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Anne for years you've stated that you KNOW what you heard, an earlier accident, and you had someone in your house that heard it too.
Even when some said there was nothing in the dispatch logs or police reports about it and no one else heard it that night but you , you still stuck to your story
Now you are saying that it's entirely possible that there was another accident that night. Possible?????
Can you explain how it is possible that you
and whoever was in your house are the only ones in the state of NH that heard this
previous accident and could remember it happening months or years later. Can't quite
remember how long it was before you
remembered hearing it(several months or
years) and brought it to the attention of the
MM forum.

what is striking is that you don't cross examine WW at all regarding her new information.

What up?

If you only had the latest GC log to look at you wouldn't know about the citation. So, the scanner call could have gotten some whiteout as well.

Mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
what is striking is that you don't cross examine WW at all regarding her new information.
What up?
If you only had the latest GC log to look at you wouldn't know about the citation. So, the scanner call could have gotten some whiteout as well.

I dunno. What up with yo?
First I'm not a lawyer so I have no right to cross examine anyone. I can ask questions however.
I don't believe the scanner calls would have gotten any whiteout. The calls through dispatch are recorded on disc as far as I know..
I think being told that Maura may have been in a previous accident that night because people were searching for her before it was reported is more important than if her car landed a few feet one way or the other. IMO whether it bounced or slid into part of the road or not is not important.
I'll believe the police report as they have absolutely no reason to lie. AFter seeing what happened to WW please don't drag me into that can of worms as to exactly where the car landed.
Mcsmom wrote:***If you only had the latest GC log to look at you wouldn't know about the citation.***
I don't understand this. Are you saying that Maura got a citation?
If someone else got a citation somewhere else that would have absolutely nothing to do with Maura's accident unless you know something we don't know.
If I got a citation and my name and address was left on a report that was made public and given to strangers that could have come to my home to question me about someone elses accident or whatever I would be very upset as my privacy would have been violated. I would hope my name and address would have either been removed or whiteout used to protect my privacy.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
I do.

nice try ... I know for afact you don't. But hearsay around here is considered
FACT by some. so not at all suprised with your reply.

You wish!
Sorry I out doing something of importance beside repeating hear say
like you!
Bully on does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy to pick on people?

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Absence of trailing in the splashes.
Wine runs like water.....apparently just like WW has.....

Snowy wrote:

remember the crazy days of 10,000 posts? guess there will be plenty of fun-time this winter to build on these mere 1,566.
the infection has spread to the christopher flynn thread.
and what about the relative thing in bethlehem? makes sense that MM might have been running away from someone/something to a safe destination...not far from where her car was last found.
and the distinction is well made....that only her car was found. she definitely had a plan.

Maybe it's time to say that one thing that shuts the forum down every time.

White Wash wrote:

You wish!
Sorry I out doing something of importance beside repeating hear say
like you!
Bully on does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy to pick on people?
<quoted text>

WW, why do you suppose this person has made it her personal mission to have become a pseudo-"investigator ", and by all evidence, with such a strong determination to prove herself right....with you (and others), wrong? why would someone devote such an extraordinary amount of time to developing and reinforcing theories with the availability of so few facts? perhaps the intensity of focus has warped reality over so many years...and "truth", while elusive, has become stranger than fiction....reaching and grabbing for any sound, word, clue or interpretation of any nuance as related to MM's disappearance. this thing has taken on a life of its own. a veritable pissing contest. for certain, a desire to 'blame'.
i don't see a similar intensity and attachment from your involvement, WW. your exasperation caused you to leave....your being local and vocal resulted in your brief reappearance here.
i'd predict that if we were to ignore these forums for an additional 5 years, that the contest would still be in full force when we returned.

High Bandwidth Radio wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe it's time to say that one thing that shuts the forum down every time.

emphatically agree. if the intended purpose was ever to "find" Maura, follow-through in a responsible manner was lost long ago.

Snowy I couldn't agree more!
I have 100% faith in all our LE add all the private Dicks all the media and we're at this point?
Come on that many people can't pull a rabbit out of their asses?
Only one person knows where the RABBIT is and she isn't coming out!

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
WW, why do you suppose this person has made it her personal mission to have become a pseudo-"investigator ", and by all evidence, with such a strong determination to prove herself right....with you (and others), wrong? why would someone devote such an extraordinary amount of time to developing and reinforcing theories with the availability of so few facts? perhaps the intensity of focus has warped reality over so many years...and "truth", while elusive, has become stranger than fiction....reaching and grabbing for any sound, word, clue or interpretation of any nuance as related to MM's disappearance. this thing has taken on a life of its own. a veritable pissing contest. for certain, a desire to 'blame'.
i don't see a similar intensity and attachment from your involvement, WW. your exasperation caused you to leave....your being local and vocal resulted in your brief reappearance here.
i'd predict that if we were to ignore these forums for an additional 5 years, that the contest would still be in full force when we returned.

High Bandwidth Radio wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe it's time to say that one thing that shuts the forum down every time.

the golden egg

Shouldn´t the golden egg be considered old news by now? It seems even some of the family has accepted it´s existence.

Btw, dawn - did you email me? It didn´t come through, please try again at h-an-na-h@hotmail.com

Dawn wrote:

<quoted text>
the golden egg

I really don't know what this is.
If one knew this golden egg, would a lot more make sense about this case? why it seems so strange?

I am having a day that she is out there - living - by her choice.. hard to accept but i have hope for her today.. why the family doesnt treat this like any other missing persons case is beyond me. spin spin spin.. i keep going back to the first words on ID the actions and words of the missing in the days prior are most important. we know none of that. where they have been. so they know she is happy - i do think someone else was with her in the saturn.. that i do believe and no other reason some comments would not have been made as in. they know she was there.. right there. injustice if she is missing that the critical info was not used asap for people at umass and woodsville to give details.. sad.. so sad.

Some of the comments here just appear to be complete rambling on by some people.
What in the world is the "Golden Egg"?
Why so secretive? Let's all try to make sense in our comments and put in any information we can as to what may have happened to Fred's daughter.

Leroy wrote:

Some of the comments here just appear to be complete rambling on by some people.
What in the world is the "Golden Egg"?
Why so secretive? Let's all try to make sense in our comments and put in any information we can as to what may have happened to Fred's daughter.

Leroy,

I couldn´t agree more.
Some comments here are hardly conducive for a worthwhile, comprehensible and civilized discussion.

Euroobserver wrote:

<quoted text>
Leroy,
I couldn´t agree more.
Some comments here are hardly conducive for a worthwhile, comprehensible and civilized discussion.

You guys must have missed that part of the discussions. It happened the first five years.

And hey, if you have anything "comprehensible and civilized" to contribute, feel free.

Bet I can get a peanut or two for those comments, what do you think?

Bill

Bill hopefully I was "quick" enough. I gave you

interesting
check
helpful

the trifecta :-)