Maura Murray

Judged:

3

3

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you ever weighed out the odds of someone to go missing or to be abducted from a broken down car?
Add to the fact the amount of drama that was going on in her life, that would possibly give her a reason to disappear.
How many vicitms of serial killers are caught for cc fraud a couple days before their disappearance? Or how many people are killed by local LE a couple days before they are rumored to have been involved in a hit and run. How many troubled poeple who get kicked out of college just go randomly missing with unknown circumstances.

Judged:

2

2

2

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Unless you agree that she was abducted/killed by a local cop or local dirtbag don't expect any green checks or yellow lightbulbs.
This has turned into just another forum like the old MMM forum where people were blamed without an ounce of proof that a crime was even committed.
Love the way Jenkins rolls back and forth. Can't make up his/her mind if the police or the dad did it.Quite entertaining.

Judged:

3

3

3

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Unless you agree that she was abducted/killed by a local cop or local dirtbag don't expect any green checks or yellow lightbulbs.
This has turned into just another forum like the old MMM forum where people were blamed without an ounce of proof that a crime was even committed.
Love the way Jenkins rolls back and forth. Can't make up his/her mind if the police or the dad did it.Quite entertaining.

Judged:

3

3

3

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I just have a tough time with the local theory because there would be more people on the road that would have reported seeing her before she was abducted.
What are the odds that the first car that passes her after she speaks with SBD is someone with bad intentions?

Judged:

5

4

4

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Unless you agree that she was abducted/killed by a local cop or local dirtbag don't expect any green checks or yellow lightbulbs.
This has turned into just another forum like the old MMM forum where people were blamed without an ounce of proof that a crime was even committed.
Love the way Jenkins rolls back and forth. Can't make up his/her mind if the police or the dad did it.Quite entertaining.

Judged:

6

6

6

Shack wrote:

Nobody within Maura's family or friends has ever been cruel, rude or mean to me. We keep in touch.
Seems the rude and mean discourse is only here on
Maura's forum.

Judged:

3

3

3

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Is there some sort of rule I'm not aware of that says you have to choose a theory and stick with it? I dont get the point of what your saying there is.
Obviously I dont know what happened.
I Lean towards It being someone she knew that did this but I'm really not sure.
If you look at how LE acted that nite it is rather suspicious and just plain strange, but I like to think that LE wasnt straight up involved.
I was just pointing out some strange things LE did that night.
All I was saying is that it's hard to look at what LE did and not think that there at least trying to cover something up.
I'm of the opinion that LE knows way more than there saying but they can't admit it bc I'd they admitted it then They would also have to admit thatthey can't catch the guy, which they would never do. LE will never admit that an actual crime took place until they have someone in cuffs.
Who can make up there mind about this 100%? with all the strange activity happening that night who can be sure what happened?
R u really trying to say that I shouldn't post if I don't Habe my mind made up?

Judged:

2

2

2

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
It is possible that she made it away from the scene and was abducted
down the road. maybe she walked up BHR and was abducted there when she realized that she was out in the middle of nowhere she decided to say ok to help and something went wrong. As NHSP have indicated that nothing can be ruled out at this point. Individuals of interest, grand jury, lie detector tests as well as the nh AG having to go to court to give evidence why they can't release records.This all leans towards suspicion that someone harmed Maura
but not enough to convict yet.

Judged:

3

2

2

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't agree with everything you've had to say, but I respect you for being honest and saying what's on your mind. I came into this with no agenda, just looking for the truth. Being objective and looking at all sides is the only way I know to get closer to the truth.
Do I think I will solve it? No. None of us will. But you've gotta look at all sides just to form a theory. And that is why most of us are here, to talk about theories.
I agree with you that there are things on both sides, LE and family, that don't make a lot of sense.
We are missing too much information. Not just a piece of the puzzle, but like half of the puzzle.
I also agree with you that it was probably someone she knew who harmed her, or who was at least involved. Local boyfriend is my current theory anyway. They were looking at locals when this was said:
"On cross-examination Timothy Ervin pushes Sgt. Landry to reveal whether or not there is a person of interest in the case and Ms. Smith objects:
Ms. Smith: I'm concerned about that, because, again, this is, to the extent this is a small community, the people know... the people, the identity of those people is fairly well known."
http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-...
That doesn't necessarily mean random "local dirtbag" abducted her in a 10 minute window. It could mean an abusive boyfriend, for example, who happens to live locally. That is not finger pointing, just a theory based on what was said in court.
I've learned that no matter what I say here, there will be people who are not happy.:-)

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Is there some sort of rule I'm not aware of that says you have to choose a theory and stick with it? I dont get the point of what your saying there is.
Obviously I dont know what happened.
I Lean towards It being someone she knew that did this but I'm really not sure.
If you look at how LE acted that nite it is rather suspicious and just plain strange, but I like to think that LE wasnt straight up involved.
I was just pointing out some strange things LE did that night.
All I was saying is that it's hard to look at what LE did and not think that there at least trying to cover something up.
I'm of the opinion that LE knows way more than there saying but they can't admit it bc I'd they admitted it then They would also have to admit thatthey can't catch the guy, which they would never do. LE will never admit that an actual crime took place until they have someone in cuffs.
Who can make up there mind about this 100%? with all the strange activity happening that night who can be sure what happened?
R u really trying to say that I shouldn't post if I don't Habe my mind made up?

Judged:

2

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I think people are being silly about using the word agenda. I think most posters on this forum would have no trouble changing their view point if truthful information came out.
When you say agenda you make it look like everyone is taking part in a huge conspiracy.

Judged:

1

1

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
But its ok to say:
:maura hit Vasi
:fred Molested Maura
:if maura just stayed at the car she would be with us
: maura was Bolimic
:maura had tay sachs
:maura was an alcholic
:maura committed suicide
This is ok to say right Wowzer? without any evidence to support any of these claims. I don't here any names dropped or aqusations of anyone but against Maura and her family and those that are on this forum because they are interested in what happened to maura and not protecting their own butt.
You threw out a turd yesterday that you had something to say to me yesterday. I am listening.

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I think people are being silly about using the word agenda. I think most posters on this forum would have no trouble changing their view point if truthful information came out.
When you say agenda you make it look like everyone is taking part in a huge conspiracy.

Judged:

2

2

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Is there some sort of rule I'm not aware of that says you have to choose a theory and stick with it? I dont get the point of what your saying there is.
Obviously I dont know what happened.
I Lean towards It being someone she knew that did this but I'm really not sure.
If you look at how LE acted that nite it is rather suspicious and just plain strange, but I like to think that LE wasnt straight up involved.
I was just pointing out some strange things LE did that night.
All I was saying is that it's hard to look at what LE did and not think that there at least trying to cover something up.
I'm of the opinion that LE knows way more than there saying but they can't admit it bc I'd they admitted it then They would also have to admit thatthey can't catch the guy, which they would never do. LE will never admit that an actual crime took place until they have someone in cuffs.
Who can make up there mind about this 100%? with all the strange activity happening that night who can be sure what happened?
R u really trying to say that I shouldn't post if I don't Habe my mind made up?

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand but I again ask. What are the odds that a girl with all the troubles she was having drives to NH crashes and then gets abducted or killed by some random person?
I don't think Maura walked that far down the road. The nose of a tracking dog is very strong. If it hit and lost a scent than it lost the scent because there wasn't a scent.

Judged:

2

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
I actually don't think ANY of it is OK. I've not accused her of any of those things. I did however say that if she had just stayed at the car or went to one of the houses in view we wouldn't be having this conversation. And I truly believe that.
JWB I have serious doubts as to how many monikers you are using and where you come from. I know you use different monikers because you admitted it after slipping up one day.
Too many people using diffeent monikers, too many fabrications, too many guessing games and too many lies all in one forum.
The ducks are out in full force only under different names.
After today I'll be busy with real people with real names at real addresses so I won't be reading or posting nearly as often.
I know, everyone is going to miss me soooooo much.

Judged:

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing is impossible so I'm not saying it is impossible but I think the odds are very very slim that she was abducted.
I think this because of the amount of men, woman and kids that walk and bike this same route spring, summer and fall. I've not heard of any being abducted or even a possible abduction before or in the 8 years that Maura's been missing.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing is impossible so I'm not saying it is impossible but I think the odds are very very slim that she was abducted.
I think this because of the amount of men, woman and kids that walk and bike this same route spring, summer and fall. I've not heard of any being abducted or even a possible abduction before or in the 8 years that Maura's been missing.