Maura Murray

Little red herring

lots of us still have the old PM's from where we got this info......... HELLO.. I came around 2 years ago........ and guess what. the golden egg was well known before i got here. I love the spin... it doesnt work. we know where the stories started. some of us have our proof too.. right from a ducks mouth

Sara wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why are people e-mailing each other about it? If it's so top secret why do people that don't even personally know Maura have this information?

Because they work together as a unified front. To direct and misdirect and report conversation as a form of manipulation. Do you remember the really long topix thread, and what led to it being shut down? This entire conversation just gets strung along, it's more like a puppet show, a distraction. A few people care sincerely, but many have agendas that they find more important, and they have no interest in sharing that agenda with you or giving any direct indication that such an agenda exists. They are characters narrating a tragedy, but the narration is a fiction, sprinkled with little facts and truths to feed the hungry.

Dawn wrote:

<quoted text>
anyone knows I didn't write the last part. I NEVER USE commas and I can't spell....... so whoever is trying to be ME> Knock it off.

Wasn´t that a post by the firecat?

Some people have gotten very upset with the mention of this so called golden egg. Why would it be so upsetting/scandalous/whatever that a 21 year old student was cheating on her long distance boyfriend? Happens all the time, doesn´t make her promiscous, just normal for her age and circumstances. Hey, even her friends admitted she got flirtacious when drinking. Her sister said she was having "boyfriend trouble", question is which boyfriend... And Sharon said on ID it´s possible there was another man in her life. Billy thought there was something on her mind the last time they talked. We may not have proof to call it a fact, but there are some pretty strong indications. I just wonder what´s the big deal?

Dawn wrote:

<quoted text>
i see your bent out of shape about CRL. I know. I wont post it. maybe I will. dunno. this time all i said as far as SHIT was " the golden egg". and it was the almighty pointy boots - ducks that told this story....... we can all start naming names if we need to set the story straight.

Dearest Dawn,

Perhaps you need to re-read your own posts, as I did the other day. Because you seem to have a severe case of ICRS. You have previously posted that you believe you were fed this info because basically everyone knows how you can't keep a secret and it was a set up. And you were so sorry for posting it and you were never coming back here again.

This week your back on it AND you have the nerve to name a first (not common) name & the place of employment. AND again state...OOOPS! I wish I didn't do that!! Oh it slipped?????

If LE have that CD, which I believe WW said she saw it during her interview, than I am sure that they have looked into it. And seeing as he is not a POI. You have a nerve criticizing people for making accusations against the SBD. You are a hypocrite!!

Sincerely,

oo00oo

hannah_b wrote:

Some people have gotten very upset with the mention of this so called golden egg. Why would it be so upsetting/scandalous/whatever that a 21 year old student was cheating on her long distance boyfriend? Happens all the time, doesn´t make her promiscous, just normal for her age and circumstances. Hey, even her friends admitted she got flirtacious when drinking. Her sister said she was having "boyfriend trouble", question is which boyfriend... And Sharon said on ID it´s possible there was another man in her life. Billy thought there was something on her mind the last time they talked. We may not have proof to call it a fact, but there are some pretty strong indications. I just wonder what´s the big deal?

I'm not upset with any of the above. I'm calling Dawn out for trying to pass rumor as fact & getting specific w/ no merit. How many people googled the info she gave out and tried to find out who he was. He could be married w/children an totally innocent. Now he is under the radar thanks to Dawns MOAB.

Think of SBD.

oo00oo

Dawn wrote:

Little red herring
lots of us still have the old PM's from where we got this info......... HELLO.. I came around 2 years ago........ and guess what. the golden egg was well known before i got here. I love the spin... it doesnt work. we know where the stories started. some of us have our proof too.. right from a ducks mouth

Dawn, I never heard of this until a few of you started spinning this 'golden egg' propaganda. In actuality, I was never sure what was being played in this scenario until the past couple days. If you must make threats to make your point, it must be those facts you speak of cannot stand alone on their merit. That is just my opinion. jmo

hannah_b wrote:

Some people have gotten very upset with the mention of this so called golden egg. Why would it be so upsetting/scandalous/whatever that a 21 year old student was cheating on her long distance boyfriend? Happens all the time, doesn´t make her promiscous, just normal for her age and circumstances. Hey, even her friends admitted she got flirtacious when drinking. Her sister said she was having "boyfriend trouble", question is which boyfriend... And Sharon said on ID it´s possible there was another man in her life. Billy thought there was something on her mind the last time they talked. We may not have proof to call it a fact, but there are some pretty strong indications. I just wonder what´s the big deal?

I don't know what the big deal is either, but that's not the golden egg that shut down the last forum.

High Bandwidth Radio wrote:

<quoted text>
Because they work together as a unified front. To direct and misdirect and report conversation as a form of manipulation. Do you remember the really long topix thread, and what led to it being shut down? This entire conversation just gets strung along, it's more like a puppet show, a distraction. A few people care sincerely, but many have agendas that they find more important, and they have no interest in sharing that agenda with you or giving any direct indication that such an agenda exists. They are characters narrating a tragedy, but the narration is a fiction, sprinkled with little facts and truths to feed the hungry.

Stated so perfectly. Thank you.

little red herring wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not upset with any of the above. I'm calling Dawn out for trying to pass rumor as fact & getting specific w/ no merit. How many people googled the info she gave out and tried to find out who he was. He could be married w/children an totally innocent. Now he is under the radar thanks to Dawns MOAB.
Think of SBD.
oo00oo

I agree. it is sad and uncalled for.

Anne I know you must have just overlooked them but could you please answer my posts on pg 79.
Post 1640, 1648,and 1649 Thanks.

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>I agree. it is sad and uncalled for.

Gee Anne it's too bad you didn't think it was sad and uncalled for when the SBD was being unjustly accused and dragged through the mud.
You never once said it was sad and uncalled for when it was happening. Why???

Wowzer the real one wrote:

Anne I know you must have just overlooked them but could you please answer my posts on pg 79.
Post 1640, 1648,and 1649 Thanks.

Well now my feelings are hurt. I even said please and thanks and I get a mean face and flames and spam. Could you all at least give me a peanut as I'm saving them up to feed the squirrels this winter. Thanks guys.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Gee Anne it's too bad you didn't think it was sad and uncalled for when the SBD was being unjustly accused and dragged through the mud.
You never once said it was sad and uncalled for when it was happening. Why???

You do not know what I was thinking concerning SBD. Your own operative words, "You never once said!"

Also, Despite what you think, I do not read these forums every day and if I remember correctly it was a beautiful weekend when you posted your questions. Another poster wrote, "It shouldn't even be repeated, as her account has not been confirmed." You answered in agreement and support. Your consistant criticism of what I say or do not say is a puzzle to say the least!

Sara-Bermuda wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe people wouldn't do this if they found out Maura really isn't a missing person. Otherwise, the case is NOT following proper missing persons protocol so that is why people continue to dig.

Sara et al..... Here is an list of media sources.....Do you guys think the family edits the scripts, writes the shows???

20/20
AMERICAN MORNING Soledad
Greta Van Susteren
Nancy Grace
Montel Williams
Investigation Discovery
Seventeen Magazine
Fox
Fox 25
WBZ
WHDH
WCVB
WMUR
WATD
Caledonian Record
Union Leader
Patriot Ledger
Boston Globe
Brockton Enterprise
Hanson Express
North Country News
Littleton Courier
Concord Monitor
Bridge Weekly
Daily Collegian
H. P. Albarelli

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Gee Anne it's too bad you didn't think it was sad and uncalled for when the SBD was being unjustly accused and dragged through the mud.
You never once said it was sad and uncalled for when it was happening. Why???

Wowzer and Bill....

Bill asked me about the various LE theories I've encountered, and just briefly I'll say that most of them placed their suspicion on SBD, simply because he was the last person to see her alive and the scent ended near the end of his driveway. This falls into the standard probable cause.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer and Bill....
Bill asked me about the various LE theories I've encountered, and just briefly I'll say that most of them placed their suspicion on SBD, simply because he was the last person to see her alive and the scent ended near the end of his driveway. This falls into the standard probable cause.

That's very interesting being that some on here have said he was cleared of anything to do with this case other than trying to help.

just a casual observation....noted that dawn has been a target of attack by an 'anonymous' poster in recent days....just as quija was before her. mention of that 'golden egg' brings out hostility in someone.

hannah_b wrote:

Some people have gotten very upset with the mention of this so called golden egg. Why would it be so upsetting/scandalous/whatever that a 21 year old student was cheating on her long distance boyfriend? Happens all the time, doesn´t make her promiscous, just normal for her age and circumstances. Hey, even her friends admitted she got flirtacious when drinking. Her sister said she was having "boyfriend trouble", question is which boyfriend... And Sharon said on ID it´s possible there was another man in her life. Billy thought there was something on her mind the last time they talked. We may not have proof to call it a fact, but there are some pretty strong indications. I just wonder what´s the big deal?

absolutely.

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Sara et al..... Here is an list of media sources.....Do you guys think the family edits the scripts, writes the shows???
20/20
AMERICAN MORNING Soledad
Greta Van Susteren
Nancy Grace
Montel Williams
Investigation Discovery
Seventeen Magazine
Fox
Fox 25
WBZ
WHDH
WCVB
WMUR
WATD
Caledonian Record
Union Leader
Patriot Ledger
Boston Globe
Brockton Enterprise
Hanson Express
North Country News
Littleton Courier
Concord Monitor
Bridge Weekly
Daily Collegian
H. P. Albarelli

I am sorry, I don't follow your thought here. Not sure what my statement of not following proper missing persons protocol has to do with media outlets.