Maura Murray

Sara-Bermuda wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe people wouldn't do this if they found out Maura really isn't a missing person. Otherwise, the case is NOT following proper missing persons protocol so that is why people continue to dig.

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer and Bill....
Bill asked me about the various LE theories I've encountered, and just briefly I'll say that most of them placed their suspicion on SBD, simply because he was the last person to see her alive and the scent ended near the end of his driveway. This falls into the standard probable cause.

WTF-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I think you should check on what "probable cause" is. The dog walking up the SBD's front door and alerting by indicating that he wants to get inside is probable cause. Not the dog standing on the state road trying to find where the scent went which most people would indicate the scent disappeared, like she got into a vehicle.
It would also be of keen interest WHEN LE said this. The day after the accident or one, two or six years after the accident.
In other words, WHAT ARE THEY SAYING NOW ABOUT SBD? Everything I have heard indicates that they don't believe he had ANY responsibility for her disappearance.
I go back to the laughable image of him trying to grab a fit young girl in front of witnesses, stuffing her into his escape vehicle, a bright yellow very large bus, and getting to his house and unloading this package in front of his girlfriend and mother/mother-in-law and no one seeing, hearing, or EVER speaking about it.
IT'S ABSURD! And continues to propagate the myth that SBD had something to do with her disappearance.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

1

Snowy wrote:

just a casual observation....noted that dawn has been a target of attack by an 'anonymous' poster in recent days....just as quija was before her. mention of that 'golden egg' brings out hostility in someone.

Judged:

1

1

1

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
I will repeat again, I am "attacking" Dawn for trying to out a person that might have nothing to do with Maura.
Dawn's "golden egg" might or might not be true. It would not surprise me if it was. My beef is outing someone with no proof. It's just wrong for people to start digging into people's lives just because they got attached to a mystery. Just like Linda Salamone, people started digging. It's wrong. And I am dissapointed you disagree with that.

Judged:

1

1

1

WTF-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I think you should check on what "probable cause" is. The dog walking up the SBD's front door and alerting by indicating that he wants to get inside is probable cause. Not the dog standing on the state road trying to find where the scent went which most people would indicate the scent disappeared, like she got into a vehicle.
It would also be of keen interest WHEN LE said this. The day after the accident or one, two or six years after the accident.
In other words, WHAT ARE THEY SAYING NOW ABOUT SBD? Everything I have heard indicates that they don't believe he had ANY responsibility for her disappearance.
I go back to the laughable image of him trying to grab a fit young girl in front of witnesses, stuffing her into his escape vehicle, a bright yellow very large bus, and getting to his house and unloading this package in front of his girlfriend and mother/mother-in-law and no one seeing, hearing, or EVER speaking about it.
IT'S ABSURD! And continues to propagate the myth that SBD had something to do with her disappearance.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

Sara wrote:

<quoted text>
What makes him so special as to NEVER get mentioned AT ALL by name in the media, but yet Billy, Fred, Maura's friends, sisters, SBD, the Westmans, The Marottes, CW ALL mentioned. I don't get what the big deal is. Everyone else had their name had plastered all over the media.

Judged:

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
I can't change the fact, and I haven't challenged the 4th Amendment, that the majority felt there was probable cause, he was the last person to see her alive, her scent ended near the end of his driveway.

Judged:

2

2

2

little red herring wrote:

<quoted text>
Dearest Dawn,
Perhaps you need to re-read your own posts, as I did the other day. Because you seem to have a severe case of ICRS. You have previously posted that you believe you were fed this info because basically everyone knows how you can't keep a secret and it was a set up. And you were so sorry for posting it and you were never coming back here again.
This week your back on it AND you have the nerve to name a first (not common) name & the place of employment. AND again state...OOOPS! I wish I didn't do that!! Oh it slipped?????
If LE have that CD, which I believe WW said she saw it during her interview, than I am sure that they have looked into it. And seeing as he is not a POI. You have a nerve criticizing people for making accusations against the SBD. You are a hypocrite!!
Sincerely,
oo00oo

Judged:

2

2

1

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
I will repeat again, I am "attacking" Dawn for trying to out a person that might have nothing to do with Maura.
Dawn's "golden egg" might or might not be true. It would not surprise me if it was. My beef is outing someone with no proof. It's just wrong for people to start digging into people's lives just because they got attached to a mystery. Just like Linda Salamone, people started digging. It's wrong. And I am dissapointed you disagree with that.

Judged:

3

3

3

Dawn wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes.. I was fed this info.. and NO it wasn't a test. because everyone else here has heard of the golden egg. I just actually said it. Everyone else just talks about it in email - I have said nothing except a name.... not a hypocrite. stefanos. I will say it again.. and the family members of the person who works for CRL knows exactly what I am talking about. You just haven't been privy to that information .... yet. And did I say this person did anything bad? How do you compare to SBD? a partial name doesn't even come close to implying that someone killed someone which is WHAT people were saying about SBD.. So now get on with your bad self. welcome back ooOOoo

Judged:

3

3

2

Sara wrote:

<quoted text>
You know, if everyone didn't act like (LE,family,friends, ex boyfriends)they didn't have a clue about anything as to why Maura left, where she was going, I don;t think people would keep playing detective. But you don't you have a whole ID episode of everyone saying we don't know, we don't know. This implies to people that there hasn't been ENOUGH digging. Do you understand?

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
I can't change the fact, and I haven't challenged the 4th Amendment, that the majority felt there was probable cause, he was the last person to see her alive, her scent ended near the end of his driveway.

Judged:

2

2

2

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
I totally understand about wanting to dig. But what right does anyone have to put his personal info on a public forum? He's not being announced as a POI. What will it accomplish? I believe the last time that happened we had amateur sleuths calling asking questions, trying to set up interviews. Don't you think that is going a bit too far?

Judged:

1

1

1

Sara wrote:

<quoted text>
I do understand, but the SBD wasn't a POI either, but everyone gave him a heck of a time adn nobody seemed to care. I don't think its okay to dig into a witnesses life, but I can understand people digging into Maura's. And if someone that was close to Maura and spent time with her the days before she disappeared is being hidden from the public's knowledge, one has to really ask WHY? It's more about the why than who, personally I could care less what his name is, where he works, etc. Is it because they didn't want to hurt Billy's feelings? Fine, just say so and people will let off. But when everyone is acting so clueless about Maura all the time, you can't help but want to help. That was the purpose of ID right? To get her story out there and state someone knows.