Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

1

FrmLE wrote:

I just have to say that one of the funniest things I read here is the theory that the State Trooper may have been involved.
Now, I know that no one here knows him, so to you he is just a name. I get that, but to someone who knows him, pretty well in fact, the idea is so preposerous I can't fully explain.
Again, to you he is just a name, "yeah maybe the Trooper was involved!!" lol, but to anyone who knows John, worked with him, knows his family, it's just absurd.
See, these are the things that don't relate well when discussing random facts on an un-moderated forum. Thats why although there is an element of entertainment here, it's so unrealistic that nothing of value can be gained by this form of discussion.
Thank You!
ThanknYou!
I do wonder, Det Columbo, do you know Trooper Monahan? In the course of your 'investigation', have you spoken to his friends, family, co-workers? Has Renner for that matter?
Do you have any comment on my statement above?
The McKay issue I can't even begin to address, what did someone call him, a "rogue cop"? lol. Yeah sure.

Judged:

4

4

3

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
This clearly puts you in the category of troll. No one, could think that douche-baggary this grand could be reasonable. You have nothing to prove your statements about harassment and even if they were true the penalty isn't being shot in the back by a POS butt wipe. Floyd has his problems, but on that day he did the right thing. No one can take that away from him.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

FBI actually doeznt have jurisdiction unless a kidnapping crosses state lines, I believe that's the definition. Unless the state asks the FBI for help, which they can choose to help, or not to help if they don't feel it's necessary.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that is how the FBI works for the most part...

Judged:

2

1

1

FrmLE wrote:

I see he formed this educated opinion from 500 miles away, with no background or information whatsoever. Never knew Bruce, Liko, never been here at all.
Douchebag is being kind, in my opinion.

Judged:

2

2

2

Elphalba wrote:

<quoted text>
If you read message boards and newspaper comments, you will see all of the time when people are convicted of crimes or even suspected, the commentators are expressing their opinion that they got what they deserved or that she should fry, or be tortured, etc. While purely speculation, I highly doubt you would be rushing to their defense. So why in this case? Because it is law enforcement that is being questioned? Double standard much? While you may not agree with the opinion that said officer "got what was coming to him", to act like it is an outrageous and trollish statement is ludicrous at best. You are smarter than that.

Judged:

3

2

1

Bumping for Maura wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer,
Just to try to straighten things out a bit if at all possible:
Was NH State Trooper JKM on duty or not at the time of Maura´s accident?
Does anyone know for sure or at least with reasonable certainty???
Thanks!

Judged:

1

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know for sure. I don't see where it matters though whether he was onduty or off and on his way home. It's not uncommon for local police to help SP and SP to help local. The towns are within feet of each other in that area with SP jurisdiction in one and local PD in the next. He may just have told the local PD he'd keep an eye out for the driver in his travels and then happened upon RO.
I think being a family man with an unblemished record and respected by the community should take any suspicion off of him but who knows, it seems some here have started a new past time of pin the tail of suspicion on anyone that has ever had any involvement in trying to help Maura Murray the night she crashed or anyone in the vicinity that was ever arrested in the past.Or anyone that looked crosseyed or winked at someone in the past.
All this has been done before more than once.

Judged:

2

2

2

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
You are right, there is no difference. And in fact, as you put it, I hate 'double standards', I sincerely hope that YOU die a long, painful, excruciating death.
Aren't we all getting along now? Have a nice day!:)

Judged:

2

2

1

Bumping for Maura wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer,
Look - I just asked an honest question, as it for some reason seems nearly impossible to make sure whether JKM was on duty or not at the time in question.
Lately there have been some unverified information on this board about JKM possibly being on duty at the time of Maura´s accident (with a reference to having been coming from Lisbon,NH, through Swiftwater).
Where did this supposed information originate?
I haven´t seen it before.
Also, it has been said many times on this board and other places that the reason why JKM never - apparently - filed a formal report for the night of February 9th 2004 was that he was not required to do so as he - supposedly - was not on duty at the time, but just happened to pass by.
I just find these inconsistencies somewhat frustrating...
That´s all.

Judged:

2

1

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
The good news is that each of us dies only once, and that includes McKay, much to he chagrin of a few posters here. It's Interesting that dead men are even being accused.

Judged:

4

4

2

Elphalba wrote:

<quoted text>While you may not agree with the opinion that said officer "got what was coming to him", to act like it is an outrageous and trollish statement is ludicrous at best. You are smarter than that.