Maura Murray

Judged:

5

5

4

WTH-the-original wrote:

Oh, so there is no confusion. So people don't think I am talking about the people here, this time. When I talk about all the time they went over and over and over the bullshit about the A-frame, I don't mean this time. I mean the three or four other times over the last eight years, that this was brought up.
Bill

Judged:

3

2

1

Shack wrote:

I was not at the Aframe..I was at the Lodge...while the professional searchers and investigators went to the Aframe. I don't know how to write it so it will be understood...or better still remembered.
As for the "metal detector guy"....you can believe it or not....it is true....
To me ...this isn't helpful as to how Maura's scent
disappeared a few feet from her car.

Judged:

4

4

4

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
"To me ...this isn't helpful as to how Maura's scent
disappeared a few feet from her car."
Shack if you were in my debate class my teacher would love you. The comment takes a vague and and awful argument of the Aframe to a more solid reference point being the dog losing her scent. Well done and good for you.

Judged:

3

3

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
WHY DID RENNER HAVE TO POST IT? Imagine the owner of the house if he was trying to sell it how much money he could lose? Imagine the tenants that lived in the house that were implicated but were never cleared and people let others run the assumption: " It was human blood, but we don't know if the DNA was tested." That is a very sad thing to allow to happen.

Judged:

3

3

3

WTH-the-original wrote:

It was a Belgian Shepherd called a Malinois.
OK. I have been quietly reading here for almost 2 weeks while enjoying myself in NH.
What have we all learned? First, Shack, doesn't know shit. She tells you that in almost every post she starts. Second, any time someone asks a question of her, all you hear are crickets. Want to know why? She tells you all the time. She doesn't know anything.
If this isn't for entertainment, what else is it for?
How long did people go over and over and over that bullshit about the A frame? I wonder who dropped that turd over the fence?
I can't keep from laughing my ass off. I thought that I needed to participate to keep the buffoonery going. But clearly I don't. All I need do is read. This is great. Keep it going. Keep engaging Shack, you will find that she has all kinds of things to say, just don't ask for any specifics. You will either get I don't know anything or the sweet sound of crickets from her.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

2

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Al I have to say is PLEASE PLEASE don't do anything to interupt the fun, it is so entertaining and predictable. I enjoy reading the 'updates' from those in the know (shack, jwb) lol..
Good stuff!

Judged:

2

1

1

Stud wrote:

Funny how you all take shots at James Renner (jealous), but drool all over what he is able to accomplish and dig up. He is, and Healy too, are both what you strange folks would love to be. Men who have the guts and smarts to earn a living solving puzzles. What is more disturbing is how you freaks think you have some sort of ownership over the Maura Murray story. Sad. Keep shoveling rumors, smearing people, and rehashing old crap.

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Haaaaa haaaaaaa haa hhaaaaaaa Hhhaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Oh god, make it stop. Where does he come up with crap like this. Yep, you figured me out. I wish I was a manly man like Renner. I am so jealous. What did I miss. Did Renner find Maura?
And yes. The Maura story is mine, all mine. No one else can talk about her without my permission. Understand? I have copyright and trademarks on her name and the story itself. I am warning you, all of you, legal action will follow if you use her name or talk about her story without my permission. Don't forget, people are paying me to post. On second thought. If I use my trademark and copyright attorneys to hound you people.....where will I get my entertainment?
Nevermind. Keep posting. The comedic value is worth more to me than any monetary compensation.
Bill

jldross wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of monetary compensation Bill, while youre in NH think you can grease the palm of a local who might give us the keys to the aframe to use for our murder mystery tour? If we don't move fast someone will steal our idea. Copyright WTH jldross inc

Judged:

3

3

3

Stud wrote:

Funny how you all take shots at James Renner (jealous), but drool all over what he is able to accomplish and dig up. He is, and Healy too, are both what you strange folks would love to be. Men who have the guts and smarts to earn a living solving puzzles. What is more disturbing is how you freaks think you have some sort of ownership over the Maura Murray story. Sad. Keep shoveling rumors, smearing people, and rehashing old crap.

Judged:

2

2

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Bill I think the AFRAME is always worth mentioning because it shows us what can happen when you let strangers on your property for whatever reason.
1. It shows us that the owner who allowed search of the house, got screwed because it is hard to sell a house when there is a rumor about a missing girl, and nobody wants to buy a house to raise a family that might become part of a massive search and dig by LE if they decide to get a search warrant.
2. It shows us that the tenants that used to live there whose names are constantly thrown around in this forum were victims of a huge rumor.
3. It shows why locals could be hesitant about allowing searches if rumors like this are allowed to fly around. Why would you want to let searchers on your property if there is a chance that a rumor can destroy your home value or reputation. No one would want a rumor about a dog going "bonkers" in your backyard. No good deed goes unpunished.
4. It shows that people on forums should be very careful about letting rumors come in and taking off.
5. I never liked the answers that were given to me when I asked direct questions about the AFRAME. "Weeper said, Blood but no DNA test."

Judged:

3

2

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Already in the works. 8-)
Bill

Judged:

3

3

3

looking4amoose wrote:

<quoted text>
No need for keys---vandals have hit the house and windows are broken--I'm sure you'd have no problem getting in

Judged:

2

1

1

GrampaMo wrote:

<quoted text>
That's too bad. It will cost the owner big bucks to replace them.