“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: <quoted text> I see it differently than you do. I'd bring a slew of lawyers with me too if I thought LE had made the switcheroo from missing person case to a criminal investigation case for the sole purpose of keeping information from me. Fred wanted more information from the git go. He was just a "pia" to them at that point. No big deal, he even met with Ayotte. What seems to be a turning point (to me) is the July 12, 2004 letter to UMASS police from Fred requesting data from Maura's computer hard drive. Is this the same comuter that the police had and gave to the family only to take it back again? If I remember correctly the sister had the computer for awhile before it was taken back. I remember we were told some dumb story about how she was unfamiliar with computers so it sat in her closet with nobody even looking to see what information was on it. Yeh, right. Is that the same computer mcsmom?
|
mcsmom
Hebron, CT
|
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> Is this the same comuter that the police had and gave to the family only to take it back again? If I remember correctly the sister had the computer for awhile before it was taken back. I remember we were told some dumb story about how she was unfamiliar with computers so it sat in her closet with nobody even looking to see what information was on it. Yeh, right. Is that the same computer mcsmom? Fred requested all UMASS information and data pertaining to her case.
|
“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: <quoted text> Fred requested all UMASS information and data pertaining to her case. That's not at all what I asked. Since the request for computer information was such a big turning point for you I just wondered if it was the same computer that sat in her sister's closet.Why were we told a cockamamy story about how they weren't familiar with computers so didn't get any information off of it before it was taken back? They had it for weeks/months? If they didn't have knowledge of computers why didn't they take it to an expert? I just can't believe that no one bothered to check the computer for information.
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: <quoted text> Fred requested all UMASS information and data pertaining to her case. When LE asked for the PC back and the dorm room, and car items where were they? Where they in a lab being looked at? Were the PI's investigating any leads off the items?
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> That's not at all what I asked. Since the request for computer information was such a big turning point for you I just wondered if it was the same computer that sat in her sister's closet.Why were we told a cockamamy story about how they weren't familiar with computers so didn't get any information off of it before it was taken back? They had it for weeks/months? If they didn't have knowledge of computers why didn't they take it to an expert? I just can't believe that no one bothered to check the computer for information. Usually when someone doesn't bother to look to find an answer, it means they already know it.
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> That's not at all what I asked. Since the request for computer information was such a big turning point for you I just wondered if it was the same computer that sat in her sister's closet.Why were we told a cockamamy story about how they weren't familiar with computers so didn't get any information off of it before it was taken back? They had it for weeks/months? If they didn't have knowledge of computers why didn't they take it to an expert? I just can't believe that no one bothered to check the computer for information. WOWZER I'm glad your back. I never thought about the PC until now. What were they doing with her PC while they had it in their possesion. If they were doing nothing then why wouldn't you want LE to have the PC so that maybe they can find out any information.
|
“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Lighthouse 101 wrote: <quoted text> WOWZER I'm glad your back. I never thought about the PC until now. What were they doing with her PC while they had it in their possesion. If they were doing nothing then why wouldn't you want LE to have the PC so that maybe they can find out any information. Thanks Lighthouse. I don't know what they were doing with it but I don't believe it sat in a closet and no one bothered to see what was on it. I would think someone would have ran to the nearest computer store to ask them to help get the information off of it if they didn't know how to do it themselves. I never believed that story either. What intelligent young person has no knowledge of computers? So many lies through the years but the big question is why is there a need to lie about so many things.
|
hannah_b
Sweden
|
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> Thanks Lighthouse. I don't know what they were doing with it but I don't believe it sat in a closet and no one bothered to see what was on it. I would think someone would have ran to the nearest computer store to ask them to help get the information off of it if they didn't know how to do it themselves. I never believed that story either. What intelligent young person has no knowledge of computers? So many lies through the years but the big question is why is there a need to lie about so many things. Glad to see you back too, Wowzer! I always had doubts about that computer story. If it was my sister who was missing, I would do anything, seek out any computer expert, pay whatever it took, to get into that computer. No way it was just sitting in a closet all that time.
|
Since: Mar 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Are you all suggesting the computer may have been tampered with (entrys erased) instead of actually being in a closet? If Mauras family had found evidence of a secret rendevous with someone I would think they would have spoken up.
|
Since: Mar 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Its been mentioned before that Aol Instant messenger was VERY popular at that time,heck I left it on to communicate with my daughter away at college...Im not to sure there would be any key logging history with that program...Any techies with a definative answer about that?
|
Interesting
AOL
|
mcsmom wrote: What bugs me when I think about Maura's case, is why Scarinza clearly misleads Renner into publicizing that Fred failed to interact with LE for two years. As WTH would say, that's pure BS. See document number 18, section 31, which states on or about Feb. 24th 2005, Fred met with the respective agencies regarding his request of information from them ( his right under the FOI Act.) At which time respective agencies agreed to improve their communication with him. Troop F, remember your dealing with Scarinza, West, Strelzin - the A-- family Dumb A--, Stupid A--, Fat A--.
|
Ridiculous
Manchester, NH
|
I've been reading older posts here this morning. What a dynamic between some of you! I have some questions concerning Beagle; What has become of him? Is he really the guy that posted those strange vids in Feb? Is it really his blog about being homeless and working at Walmart? He seems to have disappeared from cyber space completely.Does any have factual knowledge that he is all of these people?
|
mcsmom
Hebron, CT
|
Lighthouse 101 wrote: <quoted text> In my non professional opinion Sitting down and "speaking" is different than sitting down and being interrogated. Yes he could have sat down with LE and talked about the search, where they looked and if anything new developed. The fact that he brought lawyers two years later shows the readers that this time there will be questions directed at him. Under the FOI act, Fred was entitled to the information that LE was refusing to give him. Perhaps thats why he armed himself legally. Eventually this was settled in court, initially in his favor.
|
mcsmom
Hebron, CT
|
Lighthouse 101 wrote: <quoted text> When LE asked for the PC back and the dorm room, and car items where were they? Where they in a lab being looked at? Were the PI's investigating any leads off the items? They asked for these items back in July, when LE called in Major Crimes( and thereby claiming a criminal case which protects them from releasing info) Coincidentally (or maybe not) at same time Fred sent a letter to UMASS requesting, and again I'll repeat for wowzer ALL information and computer data. Just prior to that, NHSP made a trip to UMASS. And up to this point LE had given Fred some of the documents he requested.( call logs )
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: <quoted text> They asked for these items back in July, when LE called in Major Crimes( and thereby claiming a criminal case which protects them from releasing info) Coincidentally (or maybe not) at same time Fred sent a letter to UMASS requesting, and again I'll repeat for wowzer ALL information and computer data. Just prior to that, NHSP made a trip to UMASS. And up to this point LE had given Fred some of the documents he requested.( call logs ) Thats not the question that I was asking. My question is what were they doing with the "information" that they were sitting on? Why let the PC stay in the closet when LE can work on it and maybe find something. It is weird to me why the family of a missing person who aren't doing anything with a computer (which could be a bundle of information) or the belongings in a dorm room, or the car itself be so angry when LE asks to have these items back. Then when these items are taken back from FM, he then sues for FOI. To me that gets my head scratching. The sequence of events makes me personally believe that there is a chance the family thought MM would runaway, or knew the reason why she was running away, and they didn't want LE to have access to that information.
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: <quoted text> They asked for these items back in July, when LE called in Major Crimes( and thereby claiming a criminal case which protects them from releasing info) Coincidentally (or maybe not) at same time Fred sent a letter to UMASS requesting, and again I'll repeat for wowzer ALL information and computer data. Just prior to that, NHSP made a trip to UMASS. And up to this point LE had given Fred some of the documents he requested.( call logs ) MCSMOM = I'm going out on a short limb by assuming that maybe you have a son or daughter. If they went missing and they had a personal PC that probably had internet searches, old emails and other useful information. You would let five months go by before doing anything? And after doing nothing you would get angry if your LE asked for the PC back so that they can look into it.
|
mcsmom
Hebron, CT
|
Lighthouse 101 wrote: <quoted text> MCSMOM = I'm going out on a short limb by assuming that maybe you have a son or daughter. If they went missing and they had a personal PC that probably had internet searches, old emails and other useful information. You would let five months go by before doing anything? And after doing nothing you would get angry if your LE asked for the PC back so that they can look into it. UMASS IT department was one of the first in Maura's room at the time of her disappearance. I would bet her hard drive was sent to forensics, and given to NHSP. I would assume they shared this info with Fred, since NHSP gave him the computer back. LE doesn't need the computer back" to look into it" they have everything they could ever want from it. Why would they want it back in July? There's only one answer to that question.
|
“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: <quoted text> They asked for these items back in July, when LE called in Major Crimes( and thereby claiming a criminal case which protects them from releasing info) Coincidentally (or maybe not) at same time Fred sent a letter to UMASS requesting, and again I'll repeat for wowzer ALL information and computer data. Just prior to that, NHSP made a trip to UMASS. And up to this point LE had given Fred some of the documents he requested.( call logs ) You're still dancing around the questions and not giving a straight answer so I'll repeat it again. ***That's not at all what I asked. Since the request for computer information was such a big turning point for you I just wondered if it was the same computer that sat in her sister's closet.Why were we told a cockamamy story about how they weren't familiar with computers so didn't get any information off of it before it was taken back? They had it for weeks/months? If they didn't have knowledge of computers why didn't they take it to an expert?***
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: <quoted text> UMASS IT department was one of the first in Maura's room at the time of her disappearance. I would bet her hard drive was sent to forensics, and given to NHSP. I would assume they shared this info with Fred, since NHSP gave him the computer back. LE doesn't need the computer back" to look into it" they have everything they could ever want from it. Why would they want it back in July? There's only one answer to that question. I don't know the answer I'm stuck in neutral as I have mentioned so maybe you can tell me the answer? I didn't know UMASS IT department can check students computers. I doubt my college would have the authority to do that. Do you really think a college has the authority to do that, or are you making that information up to dodge a valid question (see below)? I'm not trying to fight with you, but when you make a statement like "UMASS IT department was one of the first in her room," it sounds like you are adding the urgency of the IT department to search her PC, when I don't even think they would be allowed to do it. Lets pretend that UMASS didn't have the authority to look at MM computer. Would you find it weird that people are searching in the cold NH temps, when someone could be in a warm room searching her PC for clues that could probably be very benficial to her whereabouts or atleast state of mind?
|
mcsmom
Hebron, CT
|
Lighthouse 101 wrote: <quoted text> I don't know the answer I'm stuck in neutral as I have mentioned so maybe you can tell me the answer? I didn't know UMASS IT department can check students computers. I doubt my college would have the authority to do that. Do you really think a college has the authority to do that, or are you making that information up to dodge a valid question (see below)? I'm not trying to fight with you, but when you make a statement like "UMASS IT department was one of the first in her room," it sounds like you are adding the urgency of the IT department to search her PC, when I don't even think they would be allowed to do it. Lets pretend that UMASS didn't have the authority to look at MM computer. Would you find it weird that people are searching in the cold NH temps, when someone could be in a warm room searching her PC for clues that could probably be very benficial to her whereabouts or atleast state of mind? LE went to UMASS and proceeded to check her room and computer, UMASS IT was involved in that process. Scarinza went into the room with Billy found the controversial note. There was urgency obviously. You need to familiarize yourself with this case, and I'm not trying to argue with you.
|
|