Maura Murray

Every poster but myself is an idiot. I am the only one entitled to expressing my opinion. I am always right. If other posters don´t agree with me I am going to call the police.

(disclaimer: this post is meant to be sracastic)

Maura Murray ??

elphalba wrote:

<quoted text>
Unfortunately, the state of the board has gotten to the point where it needed to be said. I stand by the perception that Maurachan seemed silly to beleive that two rights make a wrong. I also stand by the statement that Wowzer, Snowy, and Ridic appear as internet bullies possibly not loved when young. If you believe those to be insults after reading daily the attacks launched on this board, I have to question your ability to judge such things.

I'm going to assume you really mean two wrongs don't make a right. What you did was call attention to the fallacy - two wrongs don't make a right. And then used this grounds to insult people. Usually when posters are at this phase (where the forum is now)they're some issues that posters want to have worked out. The two wrongs come from two different sides of the argument. Common ground might be met. By saying two wrongs don't make a right and then insulting others you don't care about the issue being worked out you just want to show you have reason to insult them.

So while you have entered yourself as a Topix Justice who can judge "the state of the board" and you can "say what needs to be said". Thats not proper reasoning for insulting people.

Maybe I don't have the ability to judge such things, but if I were to elect a judge I'd want them to end fighting rather then continue fighting.

Bink Winky wrote:

Maura Murray ??

What happened to her??

Maura Murray = spam?????

I just wished we had some of her friends that knew her that would talk some..

loneliness of the long distance runner -(in NO way, shape or form an insult)

We know she was sorta shy, had her own personal demons as anyone else, in the HS pix Ive seen used she seems much taller than everyone else (get into that in a minute), loved hiking & camping, from a small town, etc; Maybe she seen running as a way out? Maybe she matured or grew quicker than her friends & it made her feel uncomfortable? Maybe once she got a lil older & went to college then to another one, maybe she was getting over being shy? Maybe she was just trying to live life in a way she wasnt used to? I think maybe it caught up with her to quick..
Factors like : College Athlete = a VERY hard strain (Been there)
Long distance relationship = ive heard very very hard, especially a 21yr old
Legal probs + A hard school = A breaking point for many people

Maybe she had a "nervous breakdown" as in "the telephone call"??...
The rest im not sure on & dont really like to speculate..

Maybe she was like - "The loneliness of the long distance runner"...

Major Do-Do wrote:

<quoted text>
Duly warned? Is that some sort of thinly veiled threat? Are you going to squeeze into your granny diapers, dust off your Buckaroo cap gun and take out all the posters that disagree with your incoherent crazy talk? Stop behaving like a lowbrow cow cuss.

since you need further clarification in the context of the post to which i replied....
posters are duly warned that cyber-bullying, to include the outing and/or seeking the identities of other posters, can and will be documented and reported.

Ridiculous wrote:

Elphalba,
I will admit, Snowy and I are pretty outspoken. I'm just at a complete loss as to how you can even begin to accuse Wowzer of being a bully?! Really?!
Amy, not only do I believe your point has validity, I appreciate your attempt at clarification.
Major Dog Crap,
For Goodness sake man, your language dates you and indeed is so archaic I have no idea what you are talking about!
All I was able to gather from that post is that you have run out of depends, your cap gun is quite dusty and you enjoy cussing at cows...You must be lactose intolerant.

i don't share your sense of humor, Ridiculous, but i totally appreciate it.
my writing style tends to be precise and formal. i can keep it clean and still get my points across.
poor grammar and usage is an irritant. i hope to see the day when all these "careing" folks will magically become "caring".

hannah_b wrote:

Every poster but myself is an idiot. I am the only one entitled to expressing my opinion. I am always right. If other posters don´t agree with me I am going to call the police.
(disclaimer: this post is meant to be sracastic)

can you prove it, hannah? i'm not accepting your factoid.:)
and, my dog's better than your dog...just sayin.

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm going to assume you really mean two wrongs don't make a right. What you did was call attention to the fallacy - two wrongs don't make a right. And then used this grounds to insult people. Usually when posters are at this phase (where the forum is now)they're some issues that posters want to have worked out. The two wrongs come from two different sides of the argument. Common ground might be met. By saying two wrongs don't make a right and then insulting others you don't care about the issue being worked out you just want to show you have reason to insult them.
So while you have entered yourself as a Topix Justice who can judge "the state of the board" and you can "say what needs to be said". Thats not proper reasoning for insulting people.
Maybe I don't have the ability to judge such things, but if I were to elect a judge I'd want them to end fighting rather then continue fighting.

great reasoning...you make some good points.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
can you prove it, hannah? i'm not accepting your factoid.:)
and, my dog's better than your dog...just sayin.

Sure can... I am me, and that´s a fact. Fortunately no links. Is your dog a bully dog?

I am saying so, so it must be true.

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure can... I am me, and that´s a fact. Fortunately no links. Is your dog a bully dog?

nah. just fabulous creatures, like their owner.

"Whatif" - if you're still out there and still want my help on your project, please email me again. I accidentally deleted your message.

Major Do-Do wrote:

<quoted text>
Duly warned? Is that some sort of thinly veiled threat? Are you going to squeeze into your granny diapers, dust off your Buckaroo cap gun and take out all the posters that disagree with your incoherent crazy talk? Stop behaving like a lowbrow cow cuss.

If you think that 'duly warned' is synonymous with 'thinly veiled thread', then you've got quite a reading comprehension problem.
What is this, gang up on Snowy day? Moronic.

I think Lighthouse makes an excellent point.
I am more than willing to bet that she doesn't agree with my response or reaction to JWB. I am also pretty sure she doesn't agree with my "theory" of what happened to Maura. I have no problems with that at all. She is clearly a very intelligent Lady and has a very rational, methodical approach. I have a ton of respect for her input.
Bill, miss him, and as I've said, been spanked good and hard by him in the past. I didn't threaten him, tucked my tail between my legs and did a little research before I came here spouting off again. I'm willing to bet he's not to impressed with how I handled the JWB situation either. I also know for a fact that he's not to keen on my simple theory concerning Maura either. No problem there either, the man knows more about this case and pretty much everything else than I will ever know. I've learned a ton from just reading his old posts and have huge respect for him.

Jenkins,
I'm sorry guys, I miss him too! I give him hell for his long rambling, often unsubstantiated posts,but, at the end of the day, he knows way more about this case than me. He has passion and he's got balls. He is one of the few people I know here that will argue with you and still give you props when you are right or hit him with a particularly witty insult. I'm rarely right but I've zinged him a few times. I respect him!
Marachun, Another obviously highly intelligent individual that in all honesty could probably ingest all of the knowledge I have in most things and consider it a light, in between meals snack. She appreciates Beagle. I don't...No problem. I respect her and her input.

Ridiculous wrote:

Bill, miss him, and as I've said, been spanked good and hard by him in the past. I didn't threaten him, tucked my tail between my legs and did a little research before I came here spouting off again. I'm willing to bet he's not to impressed with how I handled the JWB situation either. I also know for a fact that he's not to keen on my simple theory concerning Maura either. No problem there either, the man knows more about this case and pretty much everything else than I will ever know. I've learned a ton from just reading his old posts and have huge respect for him.

WTF, is this 'Fifty Shades of Topix’? Bill made a few untimely rah rah rahs for the NRA and then took his marbles and went home to mama. Fear not, it’s post-holing season, he’ll be back.

Simply Caustic wrote:

<quoted text>
If you think that 'duly warned' is synonymous with 'thinly veiled thread', then you've got quite a reading comprehension problem.
What is this, gang up on Snowy day? Moronic.

there's no accounting for the disconnect that leaps between the poorly comprehending brain and the product turned out from the keyboard.

while you're here, SC, i'm recalling we've had at least one impaired, overnight weekend typist in previous years, but that situation seems to have leveled out. she/he has been replaced by several more resident offenders.

once again, the bizarre postings on Friday night, 1/4, are presumed to be impaired thought processes that were recorded by keyboard.
while you have expressed concerns in recent past about these occurrences, others are also noticing, and have come forward this past weekend to express their concerns about this behavior, as well. i hope that messaging, the core issue, is not lost in the white noise.

Emmett, that dude is all heart. I think, like me he is a little hot headed and when pushed hard enough, tends to talk with his fists. He is miles ahead of me in that area though and has committed himself to being a kinder gentler man. Another one who knows so much more about this case than me and I'm pretty sure he doesn't agree with everything I say! Still, how can you not love him?

Wowzer, a bully?! for the sake of god, I won't call her a victim here because she just isn't the type, but, the bizarreness of her not being supported in this situation, that she did not instigate or ask for just blows me away! Also another extremely intelligent lady that knows this case front, back and sideways. A bully, "Ridiculous"!