Maura Murray

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe you haven't seen the kinds of emails he sends out. I somehow don't think the HGH from Canada was what he was getting at. Best regards to Svennie, BTW.

be assured...23not affirming Columbo in any way.

?23 typing with my less dominant hand while having dessert. again.

Okay, here's something for the cyber-angels to chew on. Did MM know TS before HM moved the kids into the rental on P St? Was TS's man K aroud at any time? I saw K about 2 weeks ago on the P St porch in Hamp, so he's still vertical. He doesn't have much to say but he might talk to the right person.

And she thought clay soup was evil and nasty? Good grief. No respect whatsoever for someone genuinely trying to help.

The danger is always that I might think I know what you mean, but I could be wrong.

And one more thing that a poster a little way back brought to mind and perhaps explains some of the paranoia. Did anyone ever stop to think that if you have a dry well in your basement that you use to drain your washer water into that it becomes clogged and you might periodically half fill the washer with several gallons of bleach and let it run through the cycle, down the drain, and over the rocks to break up the lint that clogs everything up? And that this bleach is available at its cheapest price at BJs but only in larger case quantities? Is that what the bleach thing and Quija's comments among many others about meth labs and amphetamines was all about?

And Maura's family tacitly endorses this kind of Nazi vigilante behavior???? Her sisters, father, cousins, and close friends, who should obviously know better, never once denouce this kind of dangerous leaping to conclusions? If they cannot distance themselves from all this, they bear the responsibility of whatever results from at least the old MMM forum and probably the various incarnations of the Topix threads, too.

It's pretty damn obvious that Det. Columbo and others think I killed Maura Murray. And it's increasingly apparent that Maura's family believes the same. I guess a whole lot of people think this. If you can't put me in jail, you think maybe you can make me self-destruct. Good luck. This isn't a gd game of Clue!!!!

And now to take a quick glance at our time! We fly back in astonishment. The clearness, naturalness, and purity of the connection between life and history have vanished; and in what a maze of exageration and contradiction do we now see the problem!

- Friedrich Nietzsche

I don't believe you are out there. There is no one there at the other end of what you imagine is the other end. There is no other end!!!

Don't tear out your hair. It's just another theatre event by Bertolt Brecht. At the end of the night, everyone still goes home and pees before going to bed.

Don't forget to tune into the next episode of "Mystery Posts," where anything can mean anything else. Or nothing at all.

Beagle wrote:

It's pretty damn obvious that Det. Columbo and others think I killed Maura Murray. And it's increasingly apparent that Maura's family believes the same. I guess a whole lot of people think this. If you can't put me in jail, you think maybe you can make me self-destruct. Good luck. This isn't a gd game of Clue!!!!

The key word here is validity. Nothing has been presented by which to show anyone is a valid suspect. Yet, we read reports that, despite that fact, people have been treated as if the valid reasons did exist. The disconnect between vality and and action has been at the center of many historical human tragedies, from slavery, segregation, the holocaust and numerous others. It is a mistake that itself does not discriminate against who can fall victim to it, it is crafty and hard to detect. And that is why we should ever more be mindful of it.

Hope_Eternal wrote:

<quoted text>
Snowy, if there were ever a posting on this forum that the idiom of “pot calling the kettle black” applied, it would be to your post above.
I mostly read and rarely post and I have yet to determine your reason for being on this particular topic of a missing woman.

You've asked a particularly good question. Ask this question several times and provide a few good possible answers. You get the picture.... You will then see what Mr. Murray is up against.

Snoopy wrote:

<quoted text>
No, were just not putting up with your bullshit.

The quagmire of BS filtering out from you et. al., makes the attempts to protect one of your own quite obvious.... Secrecy, BS, all of the efforts do not adequately defend your sick efforts and the extent to which you et. al., will go.

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
What would posters like to see answered here in this Topix thread? Not a final answer, such as where is Maura or, if she was murdered, who did it. But a kind of step in the right direction, just a small but new and helpful fact - unambiguous fact - that would move things forward, if by no means other than simple elimination? A good clue. Just one thing that might not solve the case but lead in the right direction?
What kind of intermediate fact would be most helpful?

Like I said, I agree that these are good questions.

Let me respond at least partially.

The best clues we could get would narrow the range of the search, which right now is literally worldwide. Two definitive answers that would help. Did she run into the woods or run away down the street. The other would be if she did run down the road, who did she leave with? It would be nice to clearly rule in or out that she is or isn’t in the forest. If she did accept a ride it would be nice to rule in or out the person that gave her that ride and or at least get a direction of travel from whoever dropped her off.

Like I have said before, no new evidence keeps the rumor mills grinding and some of these mills are exceedingly dull.

Bill

Beagle wrote:

Don't forget to tune into the next episode of "Mystery Posts," where anything can mean anything else. Or nothing at all.

Mystery Posts? It seems that a lot of people are fearful and for good reason. Sometimes anything can mean something else. However, at times certain cases share something and someone in common. Take for example the cases of Webb, Reed, Winans, Chaput. Hopefully, MM did not meet the predator who murdered them....but it is my belief that unfortunately this may have been the case.

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>However, at times certain cases share something and someone in common. Take for example the cases of Webb, Reed, Winans, Chaput. Hopefully, MM did not meet the predator who murdered them....but it is my belief that unfortunately this may have been the case.

Do you pay attention to anything you write? What do you think links these cases together? And what makes you insinuate that any of them are related to MM's disappearance?

You should at least attempt to put cogent thoughts together because a few more posts like this and people won't bother paying your posts any attention at all.

Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you pay attention to anything you write? What do you think links these cases together? And what makes you insinuate that any of them are related to MM's disappearance?
You should at least attempt to put cogent thoughts together because a few more posts like this and people won't bother paying your posts any attention at all.
Bill

Had you read carefully it would have been clear my post was not addressed to you. Get off your duff and research what links these cases together. If people take the time to read your redundant rants which have produced absolutely nothing over a 6-year period, it would seem reasonable they would take a few minutes to read my few sentences should they wish to do so. Your attempt to elicit information is transparent. Save your efforts for those who apparently believe in them.

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's where I pretend to be superior and make up more bullshit.

Wow, that's effective. Boy were really desparate now.

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>
Mystery Posts?

Boom shockah boobaloom zaput.

Looking4AMoose wrote:

<quoted text>
My thoughts on the runaway or suicide idea stems from her telling her professors there was a death in the family and leaving campus--per the UMass Nursing School Policy Manual in place at that time, she would've had to produce a docuememt that justified the leave from her clinicals. That, coupled with the relatively large volume of alcohol she purchased, her calls to Stowe, VT and the call to Salamone's condo when considered with the "upsetting phone call while working" have some convinced there was more than meets the eye going on in her life.

"More than meets the eye going on in her life?" Chances are great that if one were to examine the lives of several of those who have been murdered (even those who are still alive!) it would understandably become apparent things were "going on" in their lives. Every living person has something "going on" in his or her life, hopefully. Bodies have been found in Grafton County and elsewhere...and it seems reasonable to assume that their deaths were not due to whether or not they'd had taken a chemistry course. Talk about insane micro sleuthing! Yes, totally insane. Instead of attempting to turn the lives of the missing and the dead into a soap opera, possibly some focus should rest on Grafton County's Mystery Man who visits his old haunts in Vermont. Nostalgic moments....especially the Craftsbury Common and Montgomery area. Let's ask why anyone would abduct someone from the Maine Turnpike....and then place her body in the Franconia forest? Hint, hint....this behavior has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not anyone had taken a chemistry course. Let's start with Mystery Man is familiar with Grafton County....with it's people, with it's traffic patterns, roads, its busy periods of day and night.

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>
Mystery Posts?

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle -field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate --we can not consecrate --we can not hallow --this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us --that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion --that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain --that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom --and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Chico wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, that's effective. Boy were really desparate now.

You must be desperate...to be making statements in my name. That from which you might benefit, unfortunately, you do not have, even at the viseral level. One would think this would be impossible. Really, but evidentally this is not the case.