Maura Murray

john green started his think tank the other night. the blog was forwarded to me in an email. he has zero comments over three posts...

Added wrote:

john green started his think tank the other night. the blog was forwarded to me in an email. he has zero comments over three posts...

he's silly; a blog without feet on the ground doesn't matter. and he obviously doesn't have the resources to commit to "investigation". further, it's been done and redone.
at least Renner has opened up and confirmed info previously hidden.
JG will probably not emerge from his cocoon of self-importance, but so be it.

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
he's silly; a blog without feet on the ground doesn't matter. and he obviously doesn't have the resources to commit to "investigation". further, it's been done and redone.
at least Renner has opened up and confirmed info previously hidden.
JG will probably not emerge from his cocoon of self-importance, but so be it.

Apparently he has already given up. the link no longer works

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Added wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparently he has already given up. the link no longer works

interesting.

What does the thread title there say....

Yeah....THITS NOT THE JOHN GREEN THREAD....

HANKINK AROUND ... HANKINK AROUND..
WANT A COOKIE?

PAY THAT MAN. PAY THAT MAN HEIS MONEEY

Never Give Up

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Has John Green already removed his blog? I can't get to it anymore. Maybe I'm just too tech-dim to get it. I did notice yesterday that the one comment he'd had on it had already been removed, presumably by him. Guess nobody's good enough to comment there.

SpruceGoose wrote:

Has John Green already removed his blog? I can't get to it anymore. Maybe I'm just too tech-dim to get it. I did notice yesterday that the one comment he'd had on it had already been removed, presumably by him. Guess nobody's good enough to comment there.

just wondering...do you value his input? more than most others'? do you believe he has introduced new info or significantly helpful analysis?
i think he has been especially rude and vulgar to Cc...just my observation.

If you don't value JG's input then just let it go. Seems like you are just posting garbage just to say something. If he wants to go talk on another blog then so be it. You got what you want. you wanted him off Renners blog so now just let it go Geeeesh. All this JG attention I just don't get it- he is just another poster.

Get a life

I am not saying I am a JG fan just saying move on.

i wasn't addressing you. not terribly interested in your thoughts or opinions, JWB.

SnowyB wrote:

i wasn't addressing you. not terribly interested in your thoughts or opinions, JWB.

That's pretty funny because I wasn't addressing you as I don't value your opinion what so ever.

I wasn't talking to her either Granny- The old hag just keeps on flapping her gums.

Contagiously complicated wrote:

Well, clearly I wasn't on the invite list so I have not been privy to any of his new blog posts. But as I said to him before, I don't wish him any ill will. I'm just glad he's not calling me names anymore.

Really you are an innocent by stander?? Ha HA HA Don't call me names after I trash you? Are you for real?

This forum has take a turn down a dead end road.Very sad.

SnowyB wrote:

i wasn't addressing you. not terribly interested in your thoughts or opinions, JWB.

Pretty rude and mean I must say but then I wouldn't expect anything more from you.

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
just wondering...do you value his input? more than most others'? do you believe he has introduced new info or significantly helpful analysis?
i think he has been especially rude and vulgar to Cc...just my observation.

No, purely vulgar curiosity on my part to see what he was going to say/do on his new blog. And he was horrible to CC, I agree. Not very nice to me, either. Time to move on.

JWB wrote:

I wasn't talking to her either Granny- The old hag just keeps on flapping her gums.

You JWB and Granny are the same person right? And you are
having a conversation with yourself right? Don't you think that's kind of weird and creepy?
Calling someone an old hag is beyond rude. Shame on both of you, granny and jwb.

Nut patrol wrote:

<quoted text>
You JWB and Granny are the same person right? And you are
having a conversation with yourself right? Don't you think that's kind of weird and creepy?
Calling someone an old hag is beyond rude. Shame on both of you, granny and jwb.

and your regular moniker is?