Maura Murray

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
do you recall if it has ever been established as some sort of fact that security/transaction videos actually existed at the bank and/or the liquor store?

No. Because they won't release it. So the actual fact that there is a video, is questionable. There is no other case I can think of where they don't release the last photo/video of the person missing. Also the fact that they can't tell media what she was wearing is a red flag. I remember reading that the family had to guess about what she was wearing that night, based on what was missing from her belongings. This is based on my memory of what I have read over the years. Not hard facts. Take it for what it's worth.

I always found it highly supspicious they claimed to have video of her at the ATM, yet not even releasing what she was seen wearing. So maybe there is no video. They did however make a point of saying she was alone when filmed, so I´m guessing maybe they wanted to make someone feel at ease when she was in fact captured on camera being in the company of some other person. Or maybe she wasn´t there at all, but someone else made a withdrawal on her card.

There was also reportedly at least one witness who saw her leave the dorm building, but still no mention of what she was wearing. Strange to say the least.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Who knows. I guess if we knew who the other BF is, that would shed more light. But there are so many possibilities. Was she pregnant? Was her BF on the side married? Did he call her late at night (the 1am call) to end the relationship? Was he pissed that she might have been w/child? We can still keep going on and on. Will we ever know? I doubt it.

One more job for mr Renner!

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
No. Because they won't release it. So the actual fact that there is a video, is questionable. There is no other case I can think of where they don't release the last photo/video of the person missing. Also the fact that they can't tell media what she was wearing is a red flag. I remember reading that the family had to guess about what she was wearing that night, based on what was missing from her belongings. This is based on my memory of what I have read over the years. Not hard facts. Take it for what it's worth.

thank you. much appreciated.

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
One more job for mr Renner!

I have a feeling he will be a very busy man.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>I have a feeling he will be a very busy man.

you should get that feeling checked by a doctor.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer, I asked a family member, who is a retired detective about those circumstances. I just asked one question, "why would LE not use family to identify someone in a video that was missing" The response was (not knowing the details of the case) I would guess there is something incriminating in the video that they do not want family to see.

Thank you. Do we know for sure that the video (if there is one) to this day has never been shown? If they're still holding it under wraps then they have a very good reason.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you. Do we know for sure that the video (if there is one) to this day has never been shown? If they're still holding it under wraps then they have a very good reason.

maybe its a porn video?

WHAT THE?? I posted about LE and Maura's bun at the top of the page,and it shows Snowy as the poster? Was it something I did?

NHwoodsman52 wrote:

WHAT THE?? I posted about LE and Maura's bun at the top of the page,and it shows Snowy as the poster? Was it something I did?

there's a big, fat troll here....i noticed my name used, double-checked the location, and then moved on. i'm me. no one else. and i show up from a correct location.

You people are too much.

Hmmmmmm. I am from Foxboro Ma but look it says Farmingtion NH

Where's Waldo?

Tell Me....Who What When Where Why. Even IF I told You....Ya just wouldn't get it.

You people keep saying you are done with this forum and are not gonna read or post anymore.....WELL THEN.....STOP ALREADY....I AM GETTING BORED WITH YOUR BULLSHIT MYSELF. TIME TO SWITCH TO ANOTHER BAT CHANNEL.

You are all here for the attention you lack at home and from the real world. REALITY AWAITS YOU.

Be gone I say and get on with your life.

Bye for Now! I've got to get back to Foxboro before My pumpkin turns into gourd.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer, I asked a family member, who is a retired detective about those circumstances. I just asked one question, "why would LE not use family to identify someone in a video that was missing" The response was (not knowing the details of the case) I would guess there is something incriminating in the video that they do not want family to see.

Big thanks for this post, oo00oo. Confirms what many of us have been suspecting for a long time. What could be the incriminating factor in this video? A few suggestions:
- Maura was not alone
- The video shows someone else making the withdrawal.
- Maura didn´t just withdraw money from her own account but also from someone elses

Other suggestions?

NHwoodsman52 wrote:

WHAT THE?? I posted about LE and Maura's bun at the top of the page,and it shows Snowy as the poster? Was it something I did?

oh, duh. i was quoting your text, and then my replies were contained between the *xxxx* asterisks. so that is legit.
for what it matters, in another instance, my screen name was used improperly.