Maura Murray

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Big thanks for this post, oo00oo. Confirms what many of us have been suspecting for a long time. What could be the incriminating factor in this video? A few suggestions:
- Maura was not alone
- The video shows someone else making the withdrawal.
- Maura didn´t just withdraw money from her own account but also from someone elses
Other suggestions?

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
oh, duh. i was quoting your text, and then my replies were contained between the *xxxx* asterisks. so that is legit.
for what it matters, in another instance, my screen name was used improperly.

Judged:

2

2

1

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
No, but thinking about what I said about a black eye, BA would have probably mentioned that, so scratch that theory.
Also, how would a video show her withdrawing from another account?

Judged:

3

3

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
The recording would correspond with certain transactions made at that ATM at that particular time. Providing they checked what transactions were made at that ATM at the time Maura was shown on the recording, or a stolen card could have been flagged.

Judged:

2

1

1

hannah_b wrote:

On the other hand - if Maura was in fact shown on that video - why the lack of a description of what she was wearing? The footage, if it does exist, was taken in broad daylight before she left Amherst.

Judged:

1

1

1

hannah_b wrote:

On the other hand - if Maura was in fact shown on that video - why the lack of a description of what she was wearing? The footage, if it does exist, was taken in broad daylight before she left Amherst.

Judged:

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry to quote my own post, but the above leads, at least in my mind, to the question of how and why Amherst was deemed not important by family...

Judged:

4

4

4

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
And why it is was determined by LE not to release information on the case to Fred or family.

Judged:

3

2

2

Lauren wrote:

Whiston was adamant about asking about the video. He is the person who broke the story that Maura was told to leave WP for stealing and using cadet's credit card numbers. I wonder what Whiston suspects. At the time, Firefraud was the self designated Helena clone and said she was the only person allowed to email/ask a question of Helena. She told Whiston she would ask Helena about the video. Helena never answered Firefraud's email.

Judged:

4

1

1

Lauren wrote:

Whiston was adamant about asking about the video. He is the person who broke the story that Maura was told to leave WP for stealing and using cadet's credit card numbers. I wonder what Whiston suspects. At the time, Firefraud was the self designated Helena clone and said she was the only person allowed to email/ask a question of Helena. She told Whiston she would ask Helena about the video. Helena never answered Firefraud's email.

Judged:

6

4

3

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
It was used improperly, but it was quite funny.(the bite me comment)

Judged:

4

4

4

jwb wrote:

ok, Here it goes- Wowzer (aka the real one), snowy and sophie bean (who doesn't change her name). You all have been sounding like a broken record (not citigirl) over and over talking about how the family of MM has trashed the locals etc.. Ok we all get it. we have heard it over and over so move on. You continue to bash citigirl for not coming to the rescue yet you continue to bash her. The same bashing you are accusing mmm family. You are obviously all women because you just don't let things go. Enough already!If you really have finding maura as your priority then you would get to the topic and put away the claws and the finger pointing. What do you want citigirl to say? Wowzer you are very two faced and snowy you think you are a know it all, but you are the one who stirs the pot and bash people to prove some sort of point because you obviously are better than everyone else on this planet ( sign of insecurity)and then you have the gall to cry about the locals being bashed oh boo hoo.
citigirl, I wouldn't bother responding to them.They trash you and the family followers when the blog is slow . They are afraid the blog will go away and they won't have anything else to do.

Judged:

4

4

2

jwb wrote:

snowy,wowzer(real one) and sophEy ( no name change) are sharpening their pencils
and thinking deeply. Instead you should just say to yourself, yea move on. Lets talk about the lyrics of her brother. that clearly shows there was some turmoil and lets not expect her family to tell strangers that blog this stuff or any one else. Look at yourself and really think, would you do that to your family? Of course not! Snowy,wowzer,Sophie you are not going to solve the case! sorry, and they(family) don't have to tell you anything only to LE and that is pissing you off. Too bad. get over it and have good conversation with everyone and not think to highly of yourself that you are the answer.
again, I am not family and I don't know any of you
as far as I know LOL .

Judged:

4

4

4

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
a haunting recollection is a theory put forth by Mason/Fred Leatherman, a former practicing criminal/defense attorney with 30 years experience, which he advanced some time ago about Maura's disappearance and the relationship with her father.
as an overview, Mason was especially critical of Fred Murray's behavior; this via the evidence he was able to gather from extensive reading and participation in forums about MM.
it was and is a controversial theory, with pieces of his thoughts still lingering here today.
i am sorry not to have links to this history.

Judged:

5

4

4

sophie bean wrote:

<quoted text>
I think I'd be somewhat reluctant to rely on the "theories" of "Mason aka Fred Leatherman" - at best a writer of fiction / fantasy - at worst? Hard to say.