Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

Bumping for Maura wrote:

FrmLE,
Why on earth are you getting so worked up?
People are bound to have many different and differing ideas and theories, and we just don´t have enough facts to say with any kind of certainty what might have happened to Maura.
Bashing each other on the head is not going to be a productive way of achieving anything whatsoever, IMO, and that goes for both camps here.

Judged:

1

1

1

Snowy wrote:

Wowzer - nice new duck. thanks for the smile.

Judged:

1

NHwoodshome wrote:

<quoted text>
I have to take some exception, while I have seen this trait in Law Enforcement officers,I have seen it with many other professions as well. The thing is LE has to base a case in court on FACT! Due to this they tend to operate on fact, gray areas don't hold up in court and a grand jury usually won't indict based on hear say or gray area evidence. Do they think outside the box, sure but they have to dedicate their focus on what evidence they have and on past experience and statistics which bear out the highest percentage of likely hood.
Second I have found that usually the answer to many things is SIMPLE, sometimes answers are so simple they are easily overlooked, and some refuse to believe in the answer. Do LE's make mistakes, sure and I feel sometimes due to the daily onslaught of seeing mostly the bad of society its easy to get jaded.
Look at scientists, some of these people are the worse offenders of black and white syndrome. Just bring up the UFO topic in the scientific community and see what you get! Having been with Air Force Space Command most of my career, having been an adviser on battle staff and disaster preparedness for years and having one on one contact with those in the know I beg to differ with these scientists. The sheer definition of UFO is Unidentified Flying Object, it doesn't have to be from another planet, its just FREEKING UNIDENTIFIED!!! We all have our opinions and biases, its called being human and that's what makes us interesting, and annoying.

Judged:

2

2

2

Bumping for Maura wrote:

Regarding James Renner´s new post today featuring his interview with former Lt Scarinza of the NH State Police, I found it interesting that Mr Scarinza himself finds it amazing that Maura wasn´t arrested or in any way "punished" when she crashed her
father´s Toyota Corolla in Amherst, MA.
Another thing concerning this nocturnal drive:
Apparently Maura left the party she was attending at around 2.30 a.m. but suffered the car crash at around 3.30 a.m. despite the very close distance between her dorm and the location of the accident. Still it took a full hour from her departure from the party until she had the car crash less than two miles away.
Did she perhaps go somewhere else in the meantime?
According to Beagle local LE apparently took an inordinate interest in searching and checking out the smashed Corolla at a local body shop.
Why was that so?
Ideas anyone?

Judged:

2

2

2

FRMMLEE wrote:

<quoted text>
So let me get this right, you are using a 7 YEAR OLD NEWS ARTICLE that quotes a nameless investigator saying that Maura "PROBABLY" left the area in a vehicle?
This article was written at a time when it was believed Maura was possibly alive, do you really think that a 7 year old article with a vague quote by a nameless investigator qualifies as "proof"?
Thats the best you have? Thats not even a real effort, you are pathetic, don't post here anymore.

Judged:

2

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

The arrogance and rudeness that is spewed forth from the fingertips of FrmLE in his retirement from law enforcement makes Me happy he is no longer a cop.
FrmLE..... You must have been a real cactus as a cop. I am sure your curbside manner left a lot to be desired.
You sir are an ass to be polite. Did You leave of your own accord or were You tossed? Just Asking.!
John

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow. Look who's calling the kettle black. At least FrmLE has more class than to threaten to throw egg rolls in people's faces if he happens to see them in a restaurant.

Judged:

3

3

3

FRMMLEE wrote:

<quoted text>
So let me get this right, you are using a 7 YEAR OLD NEWS ARTICLE that quotes a nameless investigator saying that Maura "PROBABLY" left the area in a vehicle?
This article was written at a time when it was believed Maura was possibly alive, do you really think that a 7 year old article with a vague quote by a nameless investigator qualifies as "proof"?
Thats the best you have? Thats not even a real effort, you are pathetic, don't post here anymore.

aftermath wrote:

<quoted text>
NHwoodshome,
Speaking of fatigue, it would seem that after a fairly stressful weekend taking a trip to VT or NH would not have been in the stars. Even though I believe she was abducted at the four corners, I'm willing to hypothesize about the chance of her sauntering off into a snow-covered woodland after dark. Personally, I do not believe she would have attempted to flee even if she had been drinking alcohol. Consider that she'd been at a late night/early morning party where alcohol had been served that weekend, had left early and was then involved in an accident with her father's Toyota. It takes little alcohol to fall into the range of receiving a DUI/DWI. If she had been the drink & flee kind of person, it would seem she would have bounded off into the darkness at the time of the Toyota accident. She had not. The Saturn had been full of gas? Nearly full? So she may have stopped for gas and used a restroom. Otherwise, had she driven all of those miles without heeding nature's call (had she been drinking the quantities of alcohol people seem to believe she had been drinking)it would seem reasonable that she might have walked off the highway to urinate. If she had been drinking, was cold, etc.....seems this would have been a possibility. Still no tracks heading into the woods near the Saturn...and according to the dog, Maura's scent stopped at the intersection. Even if she had stepped off the highway into the woods and became turned around, lost....she would hear traffic on highway. There would have been no reason that she would have had to walk a mile off the highway to urinate, especially in the dark.

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Complete and utter Bull. You had NO ONE look at the windshield, lol, what a joke! How did you do this, just run up to Troop F, pop inside and ask 600, 601, or 602 for the keys and drove it to a 'few body repair guys'? Yeah that happened, what a crock.
Another Liar.

Judged:

5

AcidHouseMartin wrote:

<quoted text>
In defense of the good detective, the chances of him meeting anyone in a restaurant are nonexistent. Egg roll throwing or not.
It's like Harry Potter threatening to douse Hermione in hot and sour soup. Fictional characters can't ACTUALLY DO anything off the page.

whiston wrote:

hi Mcsmom and all,maybe the Toyota was damaged on sunday a.m. for a reason and Maura was sober.Beagle posted more than once that the police were 'all over' the toyota after it was towed in.Did anyone have a key to any condo from a prior visit ,same for the house owned by the Connolys friends in Goshen N.H. Po Po made me smile.take care philip

Bumping for Maura wrote:

<quoted text>
whiston,
Please, enlighten my feeble mind.
Why would the Toyota have been damaged for a reason?
What would have been the point?
I´m truly curious.
Thanks.