Maura Murray

Judged:

1

Frostman wrote:

Q. Why has there been no information on the 2 samples of carpet? It's part of an on-going investigation.

Judged:

1

Desenrascanco wrote:

<quoted text>
I read somwhere that it was inconclusive, & or maybe had touched to many hands or something like that.. OMG, umm.. Back at the first of feb. I read so much, from so many different sites, but its out there..
I dont know it to be fact! I do know I read it..
Yall know I will usually only answer something that I can prove, I could do some googling & find you a link possibly?

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>

sorting out fact from fiction, 3rd hand telling, gossip and hearsay has effectively told a story that cannot be substantiated by facts.

Judged:

1

Frostman wrote:

Q. Who put the rag in the tailpipe? Perhaps Maura with the intention that it would prevent the car from starting up if someone came along and tried to take it for a joyride.
Q. Why did the SAR dog lose the scent near BHR? Perhaps the vehicle she was in turned around at BHR and headed back the other way (west). Maybe that's why the area east of BHR wasn't searched that night. The police might have passed a vehicle on the way to the accident scene and thought it could have picked up the girl and choose to pursue that possibility.
Q. Why has there been no information on the 2 samples of carpet? It's part of an on-going investigation.

amy researches wrote:

Forgive me, but I'm confused.
What was thought by some searchers to be menstrual blood was found, but it was never tested? Or it was tested, but the results were not released to the public?
Who are Weeper, Silkyboxerz and Shack?

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I just want to ask why people think this matters. It can't stall a car. It can't be used to commit suicide. We do not know how long that rag was there. The cleanliness has no meaning in determining how long the rag was there. So other then the mental masturbation involved, why even talk about it or be concerned with it? There were comments that Fred had told Maura to do this "to keep the car from smoking" whatever the hell that means since it wouldn't do that and Fred, I suspect being somewhat tech savvy, it doesn't sounds like he would make a stupid statement like that. It might have been some misinterpretation of a statement he made from someone else, not him.
I am serious, why does anyone think this is important?
Bill

Desenrascanco wrote:

<quoted text>
I found that out the hard way & made an a** of myself in the process..

WTH-the-original wrote:

Oh, and has anyone seen Shack?
I have been waiting for her excellent explanation on how she knows that Maura was murdered.
What. Nothing heard you say?
Just crickets.
Surprising because in the past Shack has been a wealth of important, fact driven research and answers. Oh, wait. That wasn't her. She usually just spouts bullshack.
Bullshack Def: shack created but non fact supported bullshit.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

Oh, and has anyone seen Shack?
I have been waiting for her excellent explanation on how she knows that Maura was murdered.
What. Nothing heard you say?
Just crickets.
Surprising because in the past Shack has been a wealth of important, fact driven research and answers. Oh, wait. That wasn't her. She usually just spouts bullshack.
Bullshack Def: shack created but non fact supported bullshit.
Bill

Judged:

2

1

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
what can i say? what ever can i say?
the same BS has been going on for years. there is no limit to frustrations by dopey statements, and no limit to the patience by the realists.

Desenrascanco wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree with this one.. I tried very hard with 3 cars, posted my results, but people skipped over me.. Then Wed. Night I offered to do it on video & have my friends make it a youtube if anyone wanted me to. I didnt get a response then either..
In most cases, its the Simplest things that go un-noticed that could be a "game-changer" IMHO the rag isnt one of them, unless people know something that I havent read.. If I were to say the things I think it could have been used for, or why someone told LE that they told her to use the rag, I would be speculating.. & I dont want to do that as its been done so much..
The horse has been dead.. How many times is it going to get beat?

Judged:

1

1

1

Desenrascanco wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree & my whole attitude & perspective has changed.. I hope yall have noticed & might eventually give me a 2'nd chance..

Judged:

1

1

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

The above post should read -I can see why one wouldn't publicize Maura's messups, in the first couple days - but I would think that info. would be readily passed on to the professionals and the PIs, and even to extended family. Just not necessarily something I would bring up with any reporter doing a piece on the case - at least, not initially.
There are some cases where you watch these parents openly admitting their children had issues with drugs, prostitution, etc., not to cast a negative light on their missing kids - but rather, because they want every viable avenue explored...and if you aren't looking in the right places, you won't find what you are looking for. As painful as I am sure it must be, at least they know that the right alleys are being scoured. And that's what they/we all really want - the truth.

Judged:

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
you're solid with WTH/Bill. that says something good!

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
oh, dear...don't get into the performance testing ideas...i think someone threw a box of wine off a balcony or something to see how it splattered....or whatever.
you know those episodes of jackass? right. your friends will soon begin to wonder

Desenrascanco wrote:

<quoted text> IF something happened to me, I know my family would release a "Clint Eastwood" about me.. The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.. In hopes I would be found..

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't you mean rerelease?:)

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I just want to ask why people think this matters. It can't stall a car. It can't be used to commit suicide. We do not know how long that rag was there. The cleanliness has no meaning in determining how long the rag was there. So other then the mental masturbation involved, why even talk about it or be concerned with it? There were comments that Fred had told Maura to do this "to keep the car from smoking" whatever the hell that means since it wouldn't do that and Fred, I suspect being somewhat tech savvy, it doesn't sounds like he would make a stupid statement like that. It might have been some misinterpretation of a statement he made from someone else, not him.
I am serious, why does anyone think this is important?
Bill