Maura Murray

Just me--paris wrote:

<quoted text>Beth told me it was white. and b/c of the areas that were still white, that it had to have been put in right there at the crashsite.
And Anne, that's the problem with things Beth did at times. She took credit for things she was getting unsecured access to. She claimed that Helena would tell her when to throw out little tid bits.

Judged:

1

1

1

Just me--paris wrote:

<quoted text>Beth told me it was white. and b/c of the areas that were still white, that it had to have been put in right there at the crashsite.
And Anne, that's the problem with things Beth did at times. She took credit for things she was getting unsecured access to. She claimed that Helena would tell her when to throw out little tid bits.

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps SBD's wife meant that he had observed the crash site?
If he saw the crash that would be an entirely different ball game.
(Yes, thinking out-loud and asking honest, objective questions will land you in a lot of do-do on this forum.)

Brilliant Brian wrote:

<quoted text>
Citigirl,
Could/would you please confirm if the one on Renner's site is the one you received or the one sent to the courts? I only ask because Renner also has posted the FOIA forms Fred sent in - but the GCS log also appears to have the same gap. I would think he has the most up-to-date one. Or, was the one sent to the court, the one with more information on it - never made public? Just trying to get to the bottom of the 7:03 discrepancy. It could be important.
Thank you.

Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>
I have a set of the Grafton Co Sheriff's Logs covering that time period, there are 33 pages to it so it begins prior to the entries pertaining to Maura's accident on the Weathered Barn curve, and goes on into Feb 10th.
There is a gap in time on the log for Feb 9th between what appears to be 16:57 (4:57 PM) and what appears to be 18:08 (6:08 PM). I say "appears to be" because the time numbers are blurry, but it the hour numbers of 16 and 18 are clear. So that is about a gap of an hour, Bill.
Furthermore, these are pages 18 and 19 of the log. There is a blank space on page 18 after the time of 16:57. The blank space is an inch and a half tall. The first entry pertaining to Maura's accident appears on page 18 after this gap, and then is repeated as the second entry on page 19. I don't find other entries in the log repeated as this one is.
So it appears to me that at least one entry on the log between about 5 PM and 6 PM on that day has been removed, and possibly that there was some cut-and-paste done between the pages 18 and 19 trying to hide the gap.
Now ... I'm not saying I have the definitive copy of the log, but it does seem that the copy I have is incomplete.

Bumping for Maura wrote:

<quoted text>
citigirl,
Another response here referencing the last sentence in your post, where you state that there are 2 logs for the night of Maura´s disappearance that have different info on them.
Could you please elaborate somewhat?
If your information is correct, why on earth would there be 2 different logs around with different information???
Many thanks!

Judged:

1

1

Bumping for Maura wrote:

<quoted text>
citigirl,
Very interesting and the first I´ve ever read about the info regarding another officer on the scene.
Could you possibly let us know whether the sentence concerning another officer referenced a local officer (Haverhill PD or Grafton County Sheriff´s Dept) or a NHSP Officer.
Thank you.

Bumping for Maura wrote:

<quoted text>
hannah,
I´m not absolutely convinced that the rag actually came from Maura´s emergency kit.
As for your question No.2, I´d say that perhaps a theoretical perp just wanted to muddy the waters and create confusion, perhaps even with the idea that people would come to think that Maura herself put the rag in the tailpipe.

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Sorry Just me--paris not sure where you got your info from but you are incorrect. The PIs were in command and working on this case no one else. They met amongst themselves and had a plan of what areas would be searched before this Oct. search even took place.I was present at the Oct.2006 search.

Judged:

2

1

1

Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>
Brian, I'm not responding for Citigirl, but want to say that the copy that I have does not appear to be the exact same as what Renner has posted on his site. For example, at the bottom of his Page 3, right below the info about tow to Lavoie's Auto Care Center, you will see part of some capital letters followed by two other figures. On MY copy, the capital letters and figures are RTK-61. On Renner's, the capital letters are probably RTK but no way is the number 61 as it is on my copy. On his the number looks like 40.
I don't know what RTK and the numbers are for, but they are different on his from what I have.

whiston wrote:

Hi Bill, I have read before that there are at least 2 versions of the police logs being released.I am just trying to get an idea of how a normal call might be.I have read EMS was told to stay away from the saturn and now I may know why.Thanks .take care philip

Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know what RTK and the numbers are for, but they are different on his from what I have.

Judged:

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>Hi I've followed, but gave myself a long break. How about you?

Judged:

2

2

2

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>Yes citigirl, I was present also and we were not appraised of anything that weekend, we were seperated and frustrated for sure.

Judged:

2

2

2

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Sorry Just me--paris not sure where you got your info from but you are incorrect. The PIs were in command and working on this case no one else. They met amongst themselves and had a plan of what areas would be searched before this Oct. search even took place.I was present at the Oct.2006 search.

Judged:

1

1

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>I understand and knew that, it is unfortunate the admin. of the site knew that late.

Judged:

1

Just me--paris wrote:

<quoted text>Sorry Citygirl, but you are incorrect as well. I'm guessing you want to avoid this part, so i will drop it for your sake. But Beth and Frank are/were FRIENDS, and they DID share. Sorry to be the one to tell you. And I mean that.

Judged:

1

Just me--paris wrote:

<quoted text>Sorry Citygirl, but you are incorrect as well. I'm guessing you want to avoid this part, so i will drop it for your sake. But Beth and Frank are/were FRIENDS, and they DID share. Sorry to be the one to tell you. And I mean that.