Maura Murray

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>wowzer, I have answered you all day, remember I have been on this answering thing for many years and everyone twists what I say in my opinion. Just like the Bradley Hill Road thing, you will not find that I said that anywhere else in all these years. I have always said the chatter from the scanner was about 7. I only said I was not the originator of the 7 pm second accident although it's a plausible theory. I do not know who was looking for her, if I did, we'd be done wouldn't we? In fact what I state may be unsubstantiated but nonethe less they are facts.

Anne it's not just me. Take a look at past posts and especially the link I provided this morning.
Many more than just me are confused by your posts and the contradictions and fact changes.
Nothing is going to change and I'm getting tired of talking about something that makes absolutely no sense. I'm not spending any more time trying to figure out what you're saying.

Brilliant Brian wrote:

<quoted text>
All your posts in the past 48 hours have been on-point, imho.

Thank you.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
I never said that, I am responding to YOUR post..(Anne said)"I am sure with Mason's lack of response, that Fred's alibi was solid as I suspected."
Fred's alibi has not been made public, therefore you cannot assume that Mason is satisfied with Fred's alibi, just because he stopped posting. Don't twist things.

oo00oo, First, I am not trying to twist purposely and you are right. Dang maybe next post, I win! LOL maybe next post I get ahead! LOL!!

purposely, back to school, sorry for misspelled words and statements that do not jive with preconceived ideas. We are all here to bring as much understanding to the events that led up to and culminated in her missing. If we are as honest and as clear (Iknow I fail at times) as we can be, we may be able to make a contribution toward helping LE or CCU find the truth and bring relief for her family and all of us.

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I have posted several questions asking about things I think are honest, objective questions. Some of these posts have been deleted, others unanswered.
I've asked if anyone knows who was with her at the parties in Goshen (NYE) and at the dorm party the night her dad was in town. I've asked if anyone ever confirmed the rumor that she had a boyfriend in Amherst, and if so whether he was questioned. I've asked if a gentleman named Mason who used to post on Advocate's board ever was able to obtain the work records for Fred's alibi. I've asked if LE was informed of Maura's past, or if it was just kept out of the public/media.
I understand if no one has the answers or is allowed to say. But the response has been to accuse me of having an agenda, working for Renner, tell me I am Beagle or his lawyer etc. Someone also phoned me from a blocked number to "mind my own F-ing business". Related to this? I don't know. But I don't get calls like that on a normal afternoon. Maybe this place is making me paranoid.
I just think they are legitimate questions. I am not trying to accuse anyone or pry into anyone's life, or anything like that. I try to be objective and look at the big picture, and part of this picture is missing.

As far as I know, no names of people at the Goshen parties have never been mentioned. We know of some of the people present at the dorm party in Amherst. Mason was the first poster to bring up FM´s work records. To my knowledge, he never got to see them or know about them. We can only hope LE has checked it out. Obviuosly LE knew about Maura´s past since early on, but it was never made public. Since early on there have been hints, quite aggressively quieted by family or people acting on their behalf, Maura wasn´t the All American Girl family wanted to portrait her as. It´s not a good idea to out oneself on topix. Remember Johnny Bravado, there are lots of people like him around. Posters have been threatened and even had property vandalized.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
It's either false info. or someone is leaking info. Either way it's frustrating that people would go this far to feed their ego. The CD was in LE's possession, if that is what was on it.

A person working at that specific Wilmington company is a regular visitor to the MMM website. That´s a fact.

& how would u know that Hannah? How do u know Its a fact? Just wondering.
Also, whats the point of this person being a regular visitor to the mmm site?
Site has been the same for a few years from what I can tell.
Am I wrong here?

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>oo00oo, First, I am not trying to twist purposely and you are right. Dang maybe next post, I win! LOL maybe next post I get ahead! LOL!!

No problem, please just read before you speak & re-read before you hit "post" I'm not innocent by any means, but lot of the squabbling back & forth is due to people misunderstanding posts. I don't mean that in a condscending way, but some posts are more confusing than informative.

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
As far as I know, no names of people at the Goshen parties have never been mentioned. We know of some of the people present at the dorm party in Amherst. Mason was the first poster to bring up FM´s work records. To my knowledge, he never got to see them or know about them. We can only hope LE has checked it out. Obviuosly LE knew about Maura´s past since early on, but it was never made public. Since early on there have been hints, quite aggressively quieted by family or people acting on their behalf, Maura wasn´t the All American Girl family wanted to portrait her as. It´s not a good idea to out oneself on topix. Remember Johnny Bravado, there are lots of people like him around. Posters have been threatened and even had property vandalized.

Thanks Hannah, and everyone else who has answered.

Jenkins wrote:

& how would u know that Hannah? How do u know Its a fact? Just wondering.
Also, whats the point of this person being a regular visitor to the mmm site?
Site has been the same for a few years from what I can tell.
Am I wrong here?

It is a fact. Go look for yourself. I don´t know if this visitor really is the secret boyfriend, but it is someone visiting the site from that company.

Anne wrote:

purposely, back to school, sorry for misspelled words and statements that do not jive with preconceived ideas. We are all here to bring as much understanding to the events that led up to and culminated in her missing. If we are as honest and as clear (Iknow I fail at times) as we can be, we may be able to make a contribution toward helping LE or CCU find the truth and bring relief for her family and all of us.

Anne would you be offended if I and or others ask a few questions and request only a yes or no answer? We all believe that you might hold important info ad we are just trying to clarify what you are actually saying. I am not trying to offend you at all, but just trying to understand what you actually heard that night.

thank you

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Anne your statements here don't raise attacks, they raise questions.
And what has come to your own home? Did someone from this forum go to your home?It sounds like you're warning Amy about something. Should we be concerned with our safety?

A person connected to a major investigative agency, came to our home a couple years ago,'fishing' but had a gun. Not someone from this forum, obviously someone who followed it.
Talked to us both and it left us both unnerved. I knew someone who traced his plate for us. Even though I frustrate you and irratate you, if you knew the details of this, it would shock you, seriously. You have said before you are done with me and don't believe a word I say. which makes me discouraged. Believe this, this missing person case has larger implications than you know or I want to know.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
No problem, please just read before you speak & re-read before you hit "post" I'm not innocent by any means, but lot of the squabbling back & forth is due to people misunderstanding posts. I don't mean that in a condscending way, but some posts are more confusing than informative.

oo00oo Aren't you the one who woke me up to going off on 'production' a couple years ago? lol...Yes I appreciate that.

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey snowy can you please tell us who you r referring to when you say the "multi monikered"
Honest question, I reallly have no idea and would like to know who is usin multiple names on this board

She has stated this several times just in the past couple weeks. She never states, with specificity, who she is speaking of. Just 'multi-monikered'. I see you asked, and she declined to answer.

That's par for the course. I believe Bill calls it - throwing a turd?

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Black eye or not, I think the rest of what you're saying is important.
Isn't it interesting how certain questions here get ignored, and then the subject changes?

Yes its very interesting.
People are bringing up the egg thing again? Really?? Why not just suggest she was abducted by a UFO? Didn't someone see lights in the sky that night?

Seriously it seems like whenever the conversation is starting to get somewhere people break out these crazy theories and/or "facts" that completely derail the convo.
At least everyone is starting to pick up on this so Its not gonna work much longer.

Why was the family so adamant that nothing in her previous life before the accident mattered? What r they afraid of?
Watch the disappeared show, they got families talking about their daughter being a prostitute for drugs, but they don't care about that, they care about finding their daughter.
Why does it seem like this family was kore interested in maintaining her all American girl image then actually finding the truth.

Why didn't Fred cooperate with the investigation? What does he have to hide?
Why hasn't he ever come out with his alibi? I find it highly suspicious that he couldn't be reached for almost 2 days. You would think that if your daughter is missing u would do anything and everything to make sure people don't think your a suspect. Remember there's a 99% chance that whoever did this crime was someone Maura knew and trusted.
Where was Fred that whole time? Why didn't he return smiths calls That night? Was he driving between mass Nh and Ct?
I find it very telling that nh LE has never said anything about eliminating him as a suspect.
I'd bet theyve never been able to confirm his alibi. Generally when someone is missing and the cops eliminate the family they tell the media. Why hasn't this happened in this case.

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Anne would you be offended if I and or others ask a few questions and request only a yes or no answer? We all believe that you might hold important info ad we are just trying to clarify what you are actually saying. I am not trying to offend you at all, but just trying to understand what you actually heard that night.
thank you

no problem, I'll try to adhere to rules!lol

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>Believe this, this missing person case has larger implications than you know or I want to know.

Maybe some of Beagle´s ideas aren´t as outlandish as one would think.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Anne it's not just me. Take a look at past posts and especially the link I provided this morning.
Many more than just me are confused by your posts and the contradictions and fact changes.
Nothing is going to change and I'm getting tired of talking about something that makes absolutely no sense. I'm not spending any more time trying to figure out what you're saying.

I rarely, if ever, agree with Wowzer. That is in no way a 'dig': It's fact. However - I think she is entirely on point, with this, and has been asking questions, trying to elicit answers from you, Anne, that would clear things up. Just my two cents on the matter.

Anne wrote:

<quoted text>A person connected to a major investigative agency, came to our home a couple years ago,'fishing' but had a gun. Not someone from this forum, obviously someone who followed it.
Talked to us both and it left us both unnerved. I knew someone who traced his plate for us. Even though I frustrate you and irratate you, if you knew the details of this, it would shock you, seriously. You have said before you are done with me and don't believe a word I say. which makes me discouraged. Believe this, this missing person case has larger implications than you know or I want to know.

Does this mean you won't do yes or no answers?

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

<quoted text>She has stated this several times just in the past couple weeks. She never states, with specificity, who she is speaking of. Just 'multi-monikered'. I see you asked, and she declined to answer. That's par for the course. I believe Bill calls it - throwing a turd?

Snowy, calling others multi-monikered? Well... it takes one to know one.