Maura Murray

Posted in the Franconia Forum

Comments (Page 936)

Showing posts 18,701 - 18,720 of47,062
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19043
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins4Real wrote:
<quoted text>
wtf? u talk trash on me but u go fishin w ur dog, gun, coffee in ur pjs. its def highly suspicus u do that n think its funny when we're all here trying to find a missing girl. I find it very odd that u dont take ur cell phone fishin. whats up w that? if ur dog goes bustin thru the flat surface of that water u think itz not ur prob but what if it was a scube diver coming up 2 ask permission to serch ur lake? ur dog cant no if itz a boy scout or el qaida attack.
Something happens during the cover of the night and goes away during the day before starting all over again. I've been watching this pattern for some time now. Those were some crazy rants last night. A few people need an intervention.
Jenkins

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19044
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

3

1

1

I dont see how anybody can read what was said in court and not think a crime happened.

They say several things that make me think this: first of all they say they have information indicating that a crime may have taken place. But I guess even statement can be considered a little
Ambiguous.
After that they describe specific suspects and evidence. They say the the investigation is ongoing as to these individuals & that the persons r members of a small community and "the identity of these individuals I'd fairly well known"
So they clearly have someone in their sights, I suspect that until they find her body they won't be able to convict anyone.
Then they describe a piece o evidence they have: they classify it as a one-party intercept, which seems like a strange piece of evidence for a case like this. A one party intercept? It sounds to me like they have a suspect & they sent somebody the suspect knows in wearing a wiire trying to get this person to talk about the crime, maybe an attempt to get probable cause for a search warrant? I'm trying to think of way else this could possibly be, they describe it as "one of a kind" evidence that if they even describe it they will reveal what the evidence is.
So clearly the states attorney and Lt Landry believe a murder took place, there's no other way of interpreting it. Just the fact that strezlin is involved at all speaks volumes, he is a homicide prosecutor. If they had nothing indicating she was killed I doubt he would be very interested here. I suspect they have absolutely nothing to suggest she's in the woods, quite the contrary actually.
If they for one second thought actually thought she was in the woods, then why keep anything fr Fred? That would make things so much easier for them. Just present something that points to her being lost in the woods and explain how difficult it can be to find someone once they're lost in the woods.
The nhsp & the saag office obviously think she was murdered, but I guess they're probably just falling victim to that backwards logic too?
Jenkins

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19045
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Something else they didn't want to reveal to Fred was where Maura's last known location was. They say this is evidentiary in nature and revealing it would b detrimental to the investigation as it would reveal to the persons of interest the scope of their investigation.

What else could this mean except that the accident scene isn't her last known location? The accident scene is no secret, everybody believes that was where she was last spotted. But according to the sa this is not the case.
I wonder where it could be?

Was she picked up by some kids in town? Was she seen partying or something like that? Was she seen at a locals house waiting for a ride?
Where could this sighting be that it needs to be kept secret?
Jenkins

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19046
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Can somebody please tell me what damage has EVER been caused to anybody by posts on this forum? This is a fantasy conjured up by a few people who obviously have some sort of delusion that topix is more important than it really is. Notice it's the same people saying this as the people who feel the need to try to belittle people just to make themselves feel better.

The sbd clearly got it the worst and nobody ha ever been able to show even the slightest bit of legitimate damage to him in the real world. Seriously, did he lose his job or something? Was he shunned from the community? What possible damage was caused? I'm talking real damage, not just a few people talkin about him in an Internet forum.

Besides for the fact that everything said about him was clealy his fault. He lied multiple times to multiple people about all sorts of things, I think some people talking about it on a forum was warranted.
Its not like everyone just randomly chose locals to badmouth..nobody has ever said anything about the westmans, bc their story never changed.

Just another fantasy by some posters

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19047
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Jenkins wrote:
I dont see how anybody can read what was said in court and not think a crime happened.
They say several things that make me think this: first of all they say they have information indicating that a crime may have taken place. But I guess even statement can be considered a little
Ambiguous.
After that they describe specific suspects and evidence. They say the the investigation is ongoing as to these individuals & that the persons r members of a small community and "the identity of these individuals I'd fairly well known"
So they clearly have someone in their sights, I suspect that until they find her body they won't be able to convict anyone.
Then they describe a piece o evidence they have: they classify it as a one-party intercept, which seems like a strange piece of evidence for a case like this. A one party intercept? It sounds to me like they have a suspect & they sent somebody the suspect knows in wearing a wiire trying to get this person to talk about the crime, maybe an attempt to get probable cause for a search warrant? I'm trying to think of way else this could possibly be, they describe it as "one of a kind" evidence that if they even describe it they will reveal what the evidence is.
So clearly the states attorney and Lt Landry believe a murder took place, there's no other way of interpreting it. Just the fact that strezlin is involved at all speaks volumes, he is a homicide prosecutor. If they had nothing indicating she was killed I doubt he would be very interested here. I suspect they have absolutely nothing to suggest she's in the woods, quite the contrary actually.
If they for one second thought actually thought she was in the woods, then why keep anything fr Fred? That would make things so much easier for them. Just present something that points to her being lost in the woods and explain how difficult it can be to find someone once they're lost in the woods.
The nhsp & the saag office obviously think she was murdered, but I guess they're probably just falling victim to that backwards logic too?
Jenkins, I've said most of this myself. With the exception of the wire tap thing, which I think you could be misinterpreting. I otherwise agree with your post. When I stated my similar opinion, I also asked for feedback from FrmLE. His reply was this:

###
FrmLE to me:
"You are forming an opinion based on what you percieve to be an unusual occurance, the court proceedings. When in fact, nothing about that is unusual at all. It is completely standard operating procedure for all Law Enforcement agencies to not release case files of cases that are considered to be "OPEN".

What was unusual here is the lengths that Fred Murray went to try to obtain the files. What the State did was simply protect the integrity of the case, since there is no body it is considered open. There was a very real concern that this was a slippery slope, if the State lost this case then we would lose the ability to protect active case files from being released.

That would be very bad for a million reasons. Do not read too much into those Court proceedings.

As far as the CCU being involved, I will repeat, it is an open case. There is no body, we don't know what happened for sure, therefore it is still active.

That's all."
###

I'm not a lawyer, so I can't comment much further on this. I respect FrmLE's opinion as more educated than mine. His point about "There was a very real concern that this was a slippery slope, if the State lost this case then we would lose the ability to protect active case files from being released" is a good one - one that I hadn't considered. I still feel that all of what was said in those proceedings can't just be completely made up. It had to be based on something - POIs they were looking into at that time, etc. The court docs don't prove a murder took place, but my opinion remains that more has taken place than this being written off by LE as someone who probably died in the woods.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19048
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Jenkins wrote:
I dont see how anybody can read what was said in court and not think a crime happened.
They say several things that make me think this: first of all they say they have information indicating that a crime may have taken place. But I guess even statement can be considered a little
Ambiguous.
After that they describe specific suspects and evidence. They say the the investigation is ongoing as to these individuals & that the persons r members of a small community and "the identity of these individuals I'd fairly well known"
So they clearly have someone in their sights, I suspect that until they find her body they won't be able to convict anyone.
Then they describe a piece o evidence they have: they classify it as a one-party intercept, which seems like a strange piece of evidence for a case like this. A one party intercept? It sounds to me like they have a suspect & they sent somebody the suspect knows in wearing a wiire trying to get this person to talk about the crime, maybe an attempt to get probable cause for a search warrant? I'm trying to think of way else this could possibly be, they describe it as "one of a kind" evidence that if they even describe it they will reveal what the evidence is.
So clearly the states attorney and Lt Landry believe a murder took place, there's no other way of interpreting it. Just the fact that strezlin is involved at all speaks volumes, he is a homicide prosecutor. If they had nothing indicating she was killed I doubt he would be very interested here. I suspect they have absolutely nothing to suggest she's in the woods, quite the contrary actually.
If they for one second thought actually thought she was in the woods, then why keep anything fr Fred? That would make things so much easier for them. Just present something that points to her being lost in the woods and explain how difficult it can be to find someone once they're lost in the woods.
The nhsp & the saag office obviously think she was murdered, but I guess they're probably just falling victim to that backwards logic too?
That's fine. You can think and believe what you want. It doesn't mean anyone or everyone else has to agree with you.
You can drill down from any quoted thought or sentence or paragraph and go on to make your perfect scenario. It won't make you right, and I won't believe you.
I believe it is a problem when someone wants to take pieces of information away from a real investigation because they think they are smarter than the investigators, and can get to the finish line sooner. If it's not your profession and you haven't been trained to properly conduct an investigation then it's really none of your business. You can do more harm than good.
If you are a family member of a missing or murdered person, it may be your business but it still doesn't make it any wiser to interfere with an investigation. Because Fred was so hostile to the authorities it doesn't make him look good in the eyes of the public.
Another level down would be the guy sitting at the keyboard in the trailer park who may be high or whatever and is spouting off about the clues he's put together. He has a right to do it, but if it doesn't make sense to me, I'm not going to believe it.
hannah_b

Sweden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19049
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

2

Jenkins wrote:
What does everyone else think about Fred referring to her bf having good luck buying a car in noho?
He must b talking about a different bf, right? Does anyone know if Billy ever lived out western mass or even in mass?
I think it was a slip of the tongue on Fredīs part, and that he was indeed referring to another boyfriend. To my knowledge Billy never lived in MA. They met at WP and he went straight from WP to military service.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19050
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

hannah_b wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it was a slip of the tongue on Fredīs part, and that he was indeed referring to another boyfriend. To my knowledge Billy never lived in MA. They met at WP and he went straight from WP to military service.
Your boyfriend/girlfriend is usually closer to you than any other person, especially if you've been going together for a long time. You tell them everything.
I feel badly for Billy and the Rausch family. Maybe they didn't know Maura as well as they thought they did.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19051
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

2

Observer1984 wrote:
<quoted text>
And there it is.
Observer1984, welcome to Hell.:-) You've picked up on many things I've missed. I do like Bill; he's a funny guy.

I also agree with Snowy's assessment you quoted above, based on things I've been told by numerous sources who witnessed what went on at the first MM forum and in NH. The second MMM forum is still online, or was a few weeks ago when someone sent the link to me. Some of the BS carried over to that second forum, as well at to Topix, it seems.

Information was not just withheld from the public - the public was outright manipulated. I am told people were not allowed to ask questions about Maura's past on the forums run by the family, and that posters were kicked off for expressing opinions the family didn't like. Others were harassed away, I'm told. If this is true, and I believe it is, then it sure does sound like they are hiding something or protecting someone; maybe they're not, but that's the impression this kind of behavior gives me.

I don't share the undying respect for Renner's journalistic integrity that others do, but I respect that he has done a good job in helping to bring some of the truth about Maura's past to light. I believe her past does matter, because it could have been someone she knew who harmed her. It's not our right to know her past, but it's also a strange game to play with people who are trying to help. They have insulted the NH community as a whole - including locals like Wowzer who could have provided valuable assistance and information - and accused people like the bus driver without proof. Also wrong. I agree with those who stated that they're happy they don't live there. Fortunately for me, I don't.

Please understand, I have nothing personally against Maura's family. They are strangers to me. Anyone who loses a family member has my sympathies. I just don't understand why they've conducted themselves in the way they have. It isn't our job to try to understand them, I suppose. Just as it's not our job to find Maura. Still, many have offered to help in various ways. Because we do care.

I don't hold Maura personally responsible for the proverbial "sins" of her family and people like Shack. Maura deserves to be found. If she was killed, she deserves justice just like everybody else.

But I think it's important not to disregard the history here, because at the very least it does help explain why certain posters who have been here so long are so angry.

I hope one day the FBI will step in, or that LE will get their man or find their answers. For the sake of everyone who has suffered through this mess, as well as for the sake of closure for the family.

I'm sure someone will come along behind me to call me crazy, throw peanuts, accuse me of being in a conspiracy, create a character to mock me with, or whatever. LOL. Have at it.
hannah_b

Sweden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19052
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

amy researches wrote:
<quoted text>
Observer1984, welcome to Hell.:-) You've picked up on many things I've missed. I do like Bill; he's a funny guy.
I also agree with Snowy's assessment you quoted above, based on things I've been told by numerous sources who witnessed what went on at the first MM forum and in NH. The second MMM forum is still online, or was a few weeks ago when someone sent the link to me. Some of the BS carried over to that second forum, as well at to Topix, it seems.
Information was not just withheld from the public - the public was outright manipulated. I am told people were not allowed to ask questions about Maura's past on the forums run by the family, and that posters were kicked off for expressing opinions the family didn't like. Others were harassed away, I'm told. If this is true, and I believe it is, then it sure does sound like they are hiding something or protecting someone; maybe they're not, but that's the impression this kind of behavior gives me.
I don't share the undying respect for Renner's journalistic integrity that others do, but I respect that he has done a good job in helping to bring some of the truth about Maura's past to light. I believe her past does matter, because it could have been someone she knew who harmed her. It's not our right to know her past, but it's also a strange game to play with people who are trying to help. They have insulted the NH community as a whole - including locals like Wowzer who could have provided valuable assistance and information - and accused people like the bus driver without proof. Also wrong. I agree with those who stated that they're happy they don't live there. Fortunately for me, I don't.
Please understand, I have nothing personally against Maura's family. They are strangers to me. Anyone who loses a family member has my sympathies. I just don't understand why they've conducted themselves in the way they have. It isn't our job to try to understand them, I suppose. Just as it's not our job to find Maura. Still, many have offered to help in various ways. Because we do care.
I don't hold Maura personally responsible for the proverbial "sins" of her family and people like Shack. Maura deserves to be found. If she was killed, she deserves justice just like everybody else.
But I think it's important not to disregard the history here, because at the very least it does help explain why certain posters who have been here so long are so angry.
I hope one day the FBI will step in, or that LE will get their man or find their answers. For the sake of everyone who has suffered through this mess, as well as for the sake of closure for the family.
I'm sure someone will come along behind me to call me crazy, throw peanuts, accuse me of being in a conspiracy, create a character to mock me with, or whatever. LOL. Have at it.
Amy, arenīt you referring to Advīs first forum, the third forum, still avaialable for perusal? I belive parts of the second MMM forum can still be found using the wayback machine, but it isnīt available in itīs entirety.
And donīt be sorry whenever you get peanuts, unlit lightbulbs and such, at least somebody cares enough about what youīre posting to judge your post...

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19053
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

1

hannah_b wrote:
<quoted text>
Amy, arenīt you referring to Advīs first forum, the third forum, still avaialable for perusal? I belive parts of the second MMM forum can still be found using the wayback machine, but it isnīt available in itīs entirety.
And donīt be sorry whenever you get peanuts, unlit lightbulbs and such, at least somebody cares enough about what youīre posting to judge your post...
Hannah, the second MMM forum is still online, too. I would post the link for you, but Topix deletes links to forums.

Let's see if topix deletes this... Here, take out the spaces:
maura murray missing . com / tmp / index . php

Advocate's forum is online, as well.
Jenkins

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19054
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

amy researches wrote:
<quoted text>
Jenkins, I've said most of this myself. With the exception of the wire tap thing, which I think you could be misinterpreting. I otherwise agree with your post. When I stated my similar opinion, I also asked for feedback from FrmLE. His reply was this:
###
FrmLE to me:
"You are forming an opinion based on what you percieve to be an unusual occurance, the court proceedings. When in fact, nothing about that is unusual at all. It is completely standard operating procedure for all Law Enforcement agencies to not release case files of cases that are considered to be "OPEN".
What was unusual here is the lengths that Fred Murray went to try to obtain the files. What the State did was simply protect the integrity of the case, since there is no body it is considered open. There was a very real concern that this was a slippery slope, if the State lost this case then we would lose the ability to protect active case files from being released.
That would be very bad for a million reasons. Do not read too much into those Court proceedings.
As far as the CCU being involved, I will repeat, it is an open case. There is no body, we don't know what happened for sure, therefore it is still active.
That's all."
###
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't comment much further on this. I respect FrmLE's opinion as more educated than mine. His point about "There was a very real concern that this was a slippery slope, if the State lost this case then we would lose the ability to protect active case files from being released" is a good one - one that I hadn't considered. I still feel that all of what was said in those proceedings can't just be completely made up. It had to be based on something - POIs they were looking into at that time, etc. The court docs don't prove a murder took place, but my opinion remains that more has taken place than this being written off by LE as someone who probably died in the woods.
I'm not really sure about the wiretap thing either, I was just trying to think of possible scenarios as to how a one party intercept would b applied to this case bc that is not something commonly found in a missing person

As for frmLE's comments I agree with a lot of what he said. The state simply cannot lose the right to protect active case files as that would b a problem.

I think where he's going wrong is in the fact that this is an active case file, with persons of interest & evidence that needs to be protected.
There's no way the sa just stood in front of the judge and made this stuff up.

Also, if LE believed that she simply walked off into the woods, then what possible harm cohos come from telling Fred the evidence they have to support that theory. In that case there wouldnt be an pois or evidence that can't be released.
They wouldn't have to show him the whole file, just the evidence showing she Is most likely lost in the woods.

She is not lost in the woods, the states attorney knows it, the nhsp knows it, ever PI who's ever worked the case knows it as well, it seems like a few select posters online are the only people that don't know it.
Jenkins

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19055
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

A Green Tree wrote:
<quoted text>
That's fine. You can think and believe what you want. It doesn't mean anyone or everyone else has to agree with you.
You can drill down from any quoted thought or sentence or paragraph and go on to make your perfect scenario. It won't make you right, and I won't believe you.
I believe it is a problem when someone wants to take pieces of information away from a real investigation because they think they are smarter than the investigators, and can get to the finish line sooner. If it's not your profession and you haven't been trained to properly conduct an investigation then it's really none of your business. You can do more harm than good.
If you are a family member of a missing or murdered person, it may be your business but it still doesn't make it any wiser to interfere with an investigation. Because Fred was so hostile to the authorities it doesn't make him look good in the eyes of the public.
Another level down would be the guy sitting at the keyboard in the trailer park who may be high or whatever and is spouting off about the clues he's put together. He has a right to do it, but if it doesn't make sense to me, I'm not going to believe it.
Please don't believe me..if u want to keep your head in the sand that's your perogitive.
I don't see anybody on here claiming to be smarter than the investigators, quite the opposite really. The investigators have poisons specific evidence speaking to the crime, we do not.
The investigators state they believe a crime took place; as far as I can tell the only people who believe they're smarter than the investigators r the people who keep trying to say Maura just got lost in the woods, posters like bill & frmLE. Ate these the people your talking about? If not your point really makes no sense.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19056
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

amy researches wrote:
<quoted text>
But I think it's important not to disregard the history here, because at the very least it does help explain why certain posters who have been here so long are so angry.
I am not sure there is anger as much as there are divided loyalties. The situation becomes further divided and insurmountable when new voices and challenges are added to an existing forum.

I like chicken salad prepared with dry mustard, dill, cayenne, crasins and finely chopped bermuda onion, and served on a bed of spinach with apple and cheddar cheese. If you or someone else likes your chicken salad prepared differently, or you don't like it at all, then I hope you won't be planning to come to my backyard to kick my ass around because we disagree.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19057
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Jenkins wrote:
<quoted text>
Please don't believe me..if u want to keep your head in the sand that's your perogitive.
I don't see anybody on here claiming to be smarter than the investigators, quite the opposite really. The investigators have poisons specific evidence speaking to the crime, we do not.
The investigators state they believe a crime took place; as far as I can tell the only people who believe they're smarter than the investigators r the people who keep trying to say Maura just got lost in the woods, posters like bill & frmLE. Ate these the people your talking about? If not your point really makes no sense.
It makes perfect sense to me that she probably entered the woods, and if she did, she would not necessarily be found to this day.
It's just my opinion, and everyone has one.

“"Dancing with wolves"”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19058
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Jenkins wrote:
<quoted text>
Please don't believe me..if u want to keep your head in the sand that's your perogitive.
I don't see anybody on here claiming to be smarter than the investigators, quite the opposite really. The investigators have poisons specific evidence speaking to the crime, we do not.
The investigators state they believe a crime took place; as far as I can tell the only people who believe they're smarter than the investigators r the people who keep trying to say Maura just got lost in the woods, posters like bill & frmLE. Ate these the people your talking about? If not your point really makes no sense.
Are you saying the investigators have poison for evidence??
Green Tree please don't eat the people you are talking about.
Wow Jenkins poisoning takes this onto a completely different path.
I wonder if it was something in the water?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19059
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

10

10

9

Jenkins wrote:
Can somebody please tell me what damage has EVER been caused to anybody by posts on this forum? This is a fantasy conjured up by a few people who obviously have some sort of delusion that topix is more important than it really is.
Jenkins, congratulations, excellent job. Much appreciated that you trashed a poster who's been gone 2 months in order to lure him back into the discussion so he could be trashed some more and hopefully go over the line.

Don't worry, if he didn't flip out and cross the line this time we'll keep on trying. At least by cross-forum posting, we connected his real name with his creepy personality. It's on the internet forever. Totally forever. He deserves it. Thanks to people like you and "findmauramurray," real people in the real world hate him and won't have anything to do with him.

After he applies for a job, HR does an internet search and connects his name with trash talk and he doesn't ever get hired. Which is wicked funny because he never knows why he can't get a job. He can't even make new friends because after they meet him for the first time they go home and just Google him and then want nothing to do with him.

Eventually he'll be totally isolated and succumb to having no friends and no money and then that'll be the end of him. We'll get justice one way or the other, sooner or later, by his hand or ours, but sometimes it's fun to really drag it out.

Good work, Jenkins.

Oh, about SBD. Same deal. He couldn't get a promotion or a second job because of the rumors about him. He didn't lose his job but some parents got nervous, which bothered him a lot. And he was the butt of a busload of jokes in Woodsville for years. Still is. Too thin skinned. Hey, trash get what they deserve. SBD never looked like a model citizen anyway, if you know what I mean. Healy even called him a shithead to the media. Healy's good, one of us, really makes a guy look like dirt, you know? Even after he's dead.

“"Dancing with wolves"”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19060
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Northwestern DA wrote:
<quoted text>
Jenkins, congratulations, excellent job. Much appreciated that you trashed a poster who's been gone 2 months in order to lure him back into the discussion so he could be trashed some more and hopefully go over the line.
Don't worry, if he didn't flip out and cross the line this time we'll keep on trying. At least by cross-forum posting, we connected his real name with his creepy personality. It's on the internet forever. Totally forever. He deserves it. Thanks to people like you and "findmauramurray," real people in the real world hate him and won't have anything to do with him.
After he applies for a job, HR does an internet search and connects his name with trash talk and he doesn't ever get hired. Which is wicked funny because he never knows why he can't get a job. He can't even make new friends because after they meet him for the first time they go home and just Google him and then want nothing to do with him.
Eventually he'll be totally isolated and succumb to having no friends and no money and then that'll be the end of him. We'll get justice one way or the other, sooner or later, by his hand or ours, but sometimes it's fun to really drag it out.
Good work, Jenkins.
Oh, about SBD. Same deal. He couldn't get a promotion or a second job because of the rumors about him. He didn't lose his job but some parents got nervous, which bothered him a lot. And he was the butt of a busload of jokes in Woodsville for years. Still is. Too thin skinned. Hey, trash get what they deserve. SBD never looked like a model citizen anyway, if you know what I mean. Healy even called him a shithead to the media. Healy's good, one of us, really makes a guy look like dirt, you know? Even after he's dead.
You really understand. You truly get it. Thank you for showing it so clearly.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19061
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

A Green Tree wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not sure there is anger as much as there are divided loyalties. The situation becomes further divided and insurmountable when new voices and challenges are added to an existing forum.
I like chicken salad prepared with dry mustard, dill, cayenne, crasins and finely chopped bermuda onion, and served on a bed of spinach with apple and cheddar cheese. If you or someone else likes your chicken salad prepared differently, or you don't like it at all, then I hope you won't be planning to come to my backyard to kick my ass around because we disagree.
I don't blame people for being angry, if they are. I see what you're saying though.

And don't worry. I am capable of agreeing to disagree with someone's opinion without cussing them out, insulting them, or resorting to violence.

PS I do not like potato salad. Just fyi, in case there is ever topix picnic.:-)

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19062
Apr 16, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Northwestern DA wrote:
<quoted text>
Jenkins, congratulations, excellent job. Much appreciated that you trashed a poster who's been gone 2 months in order to lure him back into the discussion so he could be trashed some more and hopefully go over the line.
Don't worry, if he didn't flip out and cross the line this time we'll keep on trying. At least by cross-forum posting, we connected his real name with his creepy personality. It's on the internet forever. Totally forever. He deserves it. Thanks to people like you and "findmauramurray," real people in the real world hate him and won't have anything to do with him.
After he applies for a job, HR does an internet search and connects his name with trash talk and he doesn't ever get hired. Which is wicked funny because he never knows why he can't get a job. He can't even make new friends because after they meet him for the first time they go home and just Google him and then want nothing to do with him.
Eventually he'll be totally isolated and succumb to having no friends and no money and then that'll be the end of him. We'll get justice one way or the other, sooner or later, by his hand or ours, but sometimes it's fun to really drag it out.
Good work, Jenkins.
Oh, about SBD. Same deal. He couldn't get a promotion or a second job because of the rumors about him. He didn't lose his job but some parents got nervous, which bothered him a lot. And he was the butt of a busload of jokes in Woodsville for years. Still is. Too thin skinned. Hey, trash get what they deserve. SBD never looked like a model citizen anyway, if you know what I mean. Healy even called him a shithead to the media. Healy's good, one of us, really makes a guy look like dirt, you know? Even after he's dead.
Exactly. The potential damage to what is done to people by this behavior, even if it is contained to the internet, is unknown. There's no "real world" vs "the internet" anymore. Things are connected, traced back, and affect people's real lives in real ways.

I put my info out there, and people used it against me. My bad.

But others should not be outed, or have their reputations trashed without proof, etc. That's the kind of stuff that makes me sick, and makes me not want to post here.

It's scary, in general, the lengths people will go to to take "justice" into their own hands. Hang in there. Not everyone is against you, even if it feels that way at times.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 18,701 - 18,720 of47,062
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

34 Users are viewing the Franconia Forum right now

Search the Franconia Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
COlumbos HOuse of SPam 4 hr Habs 546
Author James Renner's Cruel Online 'Ruse' 6 hr Red October 19
Surprise Fireball Streaks Across Stunning Night... (Jul '13) 9 hr Willy Lion 16
Who do you support for U.S. House in New Hampsh... (Oct '10) Sun Habs 25
New book questions Ayotte judgment in officer s... (Sep '09) Apr 19 Red October 92
"TO TELL THE TRUTH" The Quest for True Identities Apr 17 Pointless Endeavor 57
NH law keeps murder case liars on the hook forever (Jul '09) Apr 15 SPQR 13
•••
•••
•••

Franconia Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Franconia People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••