Maura Murray

Judged:

3

1

1

NHME wrote:

WTH and others who continue to make fun of people who have ideas that are different than your own..I have been reading this forum for a couple of months now and I really have to wonder why you even bother to post on here. Obviously you have all of the answers already.(So you think) Is there nothing better for you to do but poke fun at people that are just trying to find answers and breathe life into the unknown? That is the whole reason why this forum has existed for so long. This mystery has always been compelling and people like to keep it alive for the sake of this poor girl. Why do you even waste your precious time? Why does it bother you so much? Why not just continue to believe you are such an expert and keep your superior knowledge to yourself if you are so tired of the "windmill"? Why not leave all the newbies (and others) alone to their theories. It is just a forum. Forums exist for this very reason.

Judged:

4

2

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope. No reason for me to tell about her history. It's well known and I have no intention of giving her any press that she doesn't deserve. She may wish to explain herself and we will be happy to point out any lies she may make.
And her danger is in that she appears to be giving useful information when in fact, it is often crap. People who are full of shit are ignored because, well, because they are full of shit and no threat because they can be seen as such. Dangerous people are the ones that appear to not be full of shit, but are and can't be identified as such. The wolf in sheep's clothing so to speak.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

1

Advocate wrote:

Okay, let's think for a minute. What if this fella-who-shall-go-unnamed but who has bragged that he did it, actually did it? He has claimed he did -- which in the JonBenet case was enough to extradite a guy from Thailand and bring him to the USA for questioning.
Given this fella has some relation to law enforcement officials, it raises my eyebrows as to why there was a refusal to allow property to be searched. That's everyone's right, of course, but the majority of people see the value in complying when the issue is serious. I would think this fella's law enforcement family members would advise him to comply -- surely they know he has said he "did it". If they believe him innocent, it's in everyone's best interest for him to allow LE to check things out.
And, LE not being able to get a search warrant for this particular property may in fact be connected to the law enforcement official family member of this fella.
Could be enough to raise the point to the FBI and maybe get a granted search warrant out of it.

Judged:

1

1

1

JWB wrote:

CS Grad from WHS why did he not know which way to go to the WB crash?

Judged:

3

2

2

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Whats your guess jwB???

Judged:

1

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Within the quote you have posted Det. Columbo writes "Is it possible?"...Which leads me to believe he was just tossing out one possible theory..

Judged:

2

1

1

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
I think theres quite a few wolfs in sheeps clothing here Bill...Let it go...Take a deep breathe&adjust your panties...Unless of course they speak some truth&it scares you?

Judged:

2

2

1

NHME wrote:

WTH and others who continue to make fun of people who have ideas that are different than your own..I have been reading this forum for a couple of months now and I really have to wonder why you even bother to post on here. Obviously you have all of the answers already.(So you think) Is there nothing better for you to do but poke fun at people that are just trying to find answers and breathe life into the unknown? That is the whole reason why this forum has existed for so long. This mystery has always been compelling and people like to keep it alive for the sake of this poor girl. Why do you even waste your precious time? Why does it bother you so much? Why not just continue to believe you are such an expert and keep your superior knowledge to yourself if you are so tired of the "windmill"? Why not leave all the newbies (and others) alone to their theories. It is just a forum. Forums exist for this very reason.

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
One way FBI can step in without being invited is to investigate based on "public corruption". IF the private investigators or anyone else has a solid lead that someone related to a prosecutor, or LE, or anyone else in a public position may have committed this crime... then they should report this info to the FBI, rather than post this on a forum. JMHO. The person reporting the info does not need to be a local or a voter. The FBI accepts tips from anyone.
The FBI website has some details about the types of corruption they investigate.
http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/march/co...
"Q: Where do you find this corruption?
A: Just about everywhere—at the federal, state, and local levels throughout the country. And I should point out, the vast majority of our country’s public officials are honest and work hard to improve the lives of the American people. But a small number make decisions for the wrong reasons—usually, to line their own pockets or those of friends and family. These people can be found—and have been found—in legislatures, courts, city halls, law enforcement departments, school and zoning boards, government agencies of all kinds (including those that regulate elections and transportation), and even companies that do business with government.
Q: How does the FBI investigate public corruption?
A: We’re in a unique position to investigate allegations of public corruption. Our lawful use of sophisticated investigative tools and methods—like undercover operations, court-authorized electronic surveillance, and informants—often gives us a front-row seat to witness the actual exchange of bribe money or a backroom handshake that seals an illegal deal…and enough evidence to send the culprits to prison. But we have plenty of help. We often work in conjunction with the inspector general offices from various federal agencies, as well as with our state and local partners. And we depend greatly on assistance from the public. So let me end by saying, if anyone out there has any information about potential wrongdoing by a public official, please submit a tip online or contact your local FBI field office. Your help really makes a difference."

Judged:

2

2

2

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>My reasoning for wanting the FBI involved way back is because there are to many unknowns concerning Mauras disappearance. This is my only reasoning for wanting them involved.

SRSLYWTH wrote:

<quoted text>
I SRSLY agree with u but not bcuz I think NH is corrupt. The world is corrupt so get used to it. She disappeared between two states. The FBI should be involved for that reason. Its dumb to say NH turned away the FBI. Link it or its just BS. Mr. Jenkins has real work to do. Tell him to contact the FBI.
The Goat

Judged:

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>My reasoning for wanting the FBI involved way back is because there are to many unknowns concerning Mauras disappearance. This is my only reasoning for wanting them involved.

Judged:

1

1

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>If you reread my postings no where did I say NH was corrupt. I never stated that NH turned the FBI away. Only that the FBI cannot investigate NH unless they are invited in. I have stated in the past if any one has info concerning Mauras disappearance that they should contact LE. Because she has disappeared between 2 states is my reasoning for wanting the FBI involved as to which I stated in previous postings.

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not jwb but If you read what frank Kelly Said was that he believes smith didnt go the wrong way, at first he was responding to the earlier accident that Ann and others heard on the scanner that night, the "car slid off road" "left in private vehicle"
If you read his explanation follow it on a map it makes absolute perfect sense that he was responding to the first accident when he received the call for the crash at the wb curve. His direction of travel makes absolutely no sense otherwise. He's a local and he takes a wrong turn, absolute wrong way? It actually makes perfect sense if you account in that he was actually responding to the first crash.
We have one documented 100%, no question about it lie from smith, when he lied to the family saying that he thought it was Fred driving the car when he absolutely knew that it was Maura driving.
So what else has he lied about?
Why should we trust anything he says when we know that he definitely lied, no question about it

Judged:

1

1

1

SRSLYWTH wrote:

<quoted text>
We agree. The FBI should get in on the case. Someone should "invite" them in. All your pals think NH is corrupt. Do you wanna keep arguing? I don't get you.
The Goat

Judged:

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>My opinion is mine.Iam not and should not be held responsible for the opinions of others.This forum is anyonumous and every one has the right to say what ever they want concerning this case.Just because other posters think NH is corrupt does not mean I share the same opinion as them.

Judged:

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't understand how Smith turned left on Rte 112, wasn't he on a three way conversation with Westmans and dispatch the whole time??????????