Maura Murray

Judged:

1

SRSLYWTH wrote:

<quoted text>
SRSLY. S^it hapnz.
Goat

Judged:

2

2

1

Shack wrote:

<quoted text>Websleuths (Maura Murray) "banned" certain Posters because of their snarkiness (sp?) whatever, surly and lack of manners. The beat goes on here.
Most of us just want the truth as what happened to Maura.

Judged:

1

1

1

JWB wrote:

<quoted text not according to lighthouse101

Judged:

2

1

1

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
no abduction never happens silly frosty
By Ciara O'Rourke | Thursday, March 22, 2012, 11:04 AM
Update: Hays County authorities are still searching for a man officials say sexually assaulted a 17-year-old before trying to kill her last week.
The man lured the girl into his car, described as a white SUV, at an Austin Capital Metro bus stop the morning of March 15 and drove her to an isolated area in Dripping Springs where he sexually assaulted her, Sgt. Jeri Skrocki said.
Skrocki said investigators believe the man realized the girl might be able to identify him and so stabbed her repeatedly, leaving her for dead. Stripped of her clothing, the girl stumbled toward the sound of traffic and tried to flag down help.
A passing driving saw her and called the sheriff’s office, Skrocki said.
“This woman had been brutalized,” Skrocki said.

Judged:

1

1

1

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
Lighthouse 101 says he/she is of the same demographic as Maura and I believe his assertion was that neither he nor any of his ilk could possibly be inveigled into accepting a ride from anyone offering kindly help even if they were a stranded, under-dressed motorist on a country highway in Northern New England in February.
Did I get that right?

Judged:

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
This man was looking to lure someone in at a bus stop. Not some back road in a rural town.
JWB and Frostman I don't doubt you two are good people. Any and everyone on this site probably is. At some point you develop and emotional attachment to the case and to the victim. At some point you want a specific theory to play out because it feels better and gives a more emotional soothing. There is nothing wrong with caring.
I went to school with someone, who broke up with her BF, and threw herself infront of a train out of grief. Everyone knew she was sad. Her parents to this day would rather cope with it by saying she was pushed or thrown onto the tracks at the exact time the train was coming. When the conductor told the family and LE that he saw her alone on the tracks and he was blowing his horn and she wouldn't move, the family then said someone forced her there and was threatening her if she moved.
At some point in an unsolved case you sometimes develop a coping mechanism in the form of a solution. The strongest case for foul play would probably be a family member or close friend. That is dismissed by a lot of you, not because you actually know anyones alibi's. Its because you believe it not to be the case an emotional thought. I don't think foul play happened but the oppossing group did make a compelling case if foul play was there it probably was someone she knew and was very close to her. No need for "luring" she would jump right into the car. We say "red truck" because it gives us the emotional coping mechanism. If someone from a major car rental company shows you a rental slip for a red truck leased as an insurance replacement for a totaled toyota carolla would you still be paying attention to the red truck or would it become a red herring? Again you care and God bless you for doing so. No one wants to believe that they invested so much emotion and time into a flee the car and die in the woods. For the time and emotion we spent on this we need a much bigger and grander finale.
Please don't take this as I am trying to put you down. I'm not in anyway shape or form trying to do so.

Judged:

2

2

2

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
On July 10, 1985, 27-year old single mother Eva Morse (b. May 6, 1958) was seen hitchhiking near the border of Claremont and Charlestown, New Hampshire, on Route 12. This is the last time anyone would see Morse alive, and she too was reported missing.

Judged:

4

4

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>This man was looking to lure someone in at a bus stop. Not some back road in a rural town. JWB and Frostman I don't doubt you two are good people. Any and everyone on this site probably is. At some point you develop and emotional attachment to the case and to the victim. At some point you want a specific theory to play out because it feels better and gives a more emotional soothing. There is nothing wrong with caring.
I went to school with someone, who broke up with her BF, and threw herself infront of a train out of grief. Everyone knew she was sad. Her parents to this day would rather cope with it by saying she was pushed or thrown onto the tracks at the exact time the train was coming. When the conductor told the family and LE that he saw her alone on the tracks and he was blowing his horn and she wouldn't move, the family then said someone forced her there and was threatening her if she moved. At some point in an unsolved case you sometimes develop a coping mechanism in the form of a solution. The strongest case for foul play would probably be a family member or close friend. That is dismissed by a lot of you, not because you actually know anyones alibi's. Its because you believe it not to be the case an emotional thought. I don't think foul play happened but the oppossing group did make a compelling case if foul play was there it probably was someone she knew and was very close to her. No need for "luring" she would jump right into the car. We say "red truck" because it gives us the emotional coping mechanism. If someone from a major car rental company shows you a rental slip for a red truck leased as an insurance replacement for a totaled toyota carolla would you still be paying attention to the red truck or would it become a red herring? Again you care and God bless you for doing so. No one wants to believe that they invested so much emotion and time into a flee the car and die in the woods. For the time and emotion we spent on this we need a much bigger and grander finale. Please don't take this as I am trying to put you down. I'm not in anyway shape or form trying to do so.

Judged:

3

2

2

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice to see you back. The main problem that I've thought of regarding this theory is that if she was avoiding oncoming cars for fear of the police, or even to not get hit by an oncoming car, she likely would have had to step off into the snow. Probably leaving footprints. How often does a car pass by this road? Even if it's only 5 or 10 per hour, that's still 5 or 10 times she would have had to duck into the woods or down a side street or into the snow. A local driving by would likely notice this suspicious behavior and possibly report it, as the CW was said to do. I don't know if his sighting was credible, but that's another story.

Judged:

4

3

3

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
The area is very desolate, especially to the East. How many cars would she have to dodge? Maybe just a few.
How hard would it be? Well try this, go to the most desolate stretch of road you can find, with woods and tress on both sides, at night when it is dark, and see how far away you can spot cars coming by their headlights. How much time would you have to get off the road? Plenty of time, but hey don't take my word for it, try it yourself.
As far as the idea that every inch of that road was searched for footprints, well let's just say that never happened. The ONLY area that was searched in a manner that would identify footprints leading into the woods was the area IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE CRASH SITE.
So, to put it another way, all you people who believe that she couldn't have gone into the woods (bobby boy) because there were no footprints, you are dillusional. She could have gone into the woods anywhere along the roadway away from the crash site.
Not to mention that she could have simply walked into someones driveway, where footprints would not been seen, and walked into the woods somewhere along the driveway.
Ridiculous, how you people think and form opinions with absolutely no knowledge of the area or what was searched.
Let me clarify for all you boobies and bobby's.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
All this talk about FLIR and fox tracks is absurd, because FLIR only detects heat signature, not footprints in the snow left days before.
WTF is wrong with some of you.

Judged:

3

2

1

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
The area is very desolate, especially to the East. How many cars would she have to dodge? Maybe just a few.
How hard would it be? Well try this, go to the most desolate stretch of road you can find, with woods and tress on both sides, at night when it is dark, and see how far away you can spot cars coming by their headlights. How much time would you have to get off the road? Plenty of time, but hey don't take my word for it, try it yourself.
As far as the idea that every inch of that road was searched for footprints, well let's just say that never happened. The ONLY area that was searched in a manner that would identify footprints leading into the woods was the area IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE CRASH SITE.
So, to put it another way, all you people who believe that she couldn't have gone into the woods (bobby boy) because there were no footprints, you are dillusional. She could have gone into the woods anywhere along the roadway away from the crash site.
Not to mention that she could have simply walked into someones driveway, where footprints would not been seen, and walked into the woods somewhere along the driveway.
Ridiculous, how you people think and form opinions with absolutely no knowledge of the area or what was searched.
Let me clarify for all you boobies and bobby's.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
The only area that was searched for footprints leading into the woods was the area around the crash site.
All this talk about FLIR and fox tracks is absurd, because FLIR only detects heat signature, not footprints in the snow left days before.
WTF is wrong with some of you.

Judged:

2

1

1

Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! THATS EXACTY WHAT YOU DO EVERY TIME YOU POST!!
Whats the matter, you don't like the competition? Haahahha, priceless, just priceless..
Shut your trap

Judged:

4

4

2

BobJenkins-OG wrote:

Flir is very simple advert sensitive.
It represents change in temperature as a change in light on the screen.
Footprints are most certainly visible as it would be a change in temp from the surrounding snow.
Why people choose to ignore this fact I'm not sure, but they are.
In an on camera interview scarinza describes flying in the helicopter all the way up to n Woodstock, which is 17 miles away.
He also described being sble to see footprints and animal tracks clear as day in the snow.
He also says he's "confident she isn't in the woods in the immediate area"

Judged:

3

3

1

Reality wrote:

<quoted text> BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! THATS EXACTY WHAT YOU DO EVERY TIME YOU POST!!Whats the matter, you don't like the competition? Haahahha, priceless, just priceless.. Shut your trap

Judged:

2

2

1

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
What competition? I think Maura (may God bless her soul on her 30th birthday) was murdered. That's my opinion based on the known facts and available information. If you have any proof that she walked into the woods and succumbed to the elements, we're listening.